Investigating fear of childbirth in pregnant women and its relationship between anxiety sensitivity and somatosensory amplification

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asli Enzel Koc ◽  
Sabri Colak ◽  
Gamze Vesile Colak ◽  
Meltem Pusuroglu ◽  
Cicek Hocaoglu
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Anxiety Sensitivity ◽  
Fear Of Childbirth ◽  
Somatosensory Amplification

scholarly journals Author Correction: Factors associated with fear of childbirth among Polish pregnant women

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michalina Ilska ◽  
Anna Brandt-Salmeri ◽  
Anna Kołodziej-Zaleska ◽  
Ewa Banaś ◽  
Hanna Gelner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Fear Of Childbirth ◽  
Factors Associated

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

scholarly journals Fear of Childbirth among Pregnant Women Availing Antenatal Services in a Maternity Hospital in Rural Karnataka

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 318-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avita Rose Johnson ◽  
Melvin Kumar G ◽  
Rosy Jacob ◽  
Maria Arul Jessie ◽  
Fabiyola Mary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Maternity Hospital ◽  
Fear Of Childbirth ◽  
Antenatal Services

scholarly journals Predictors of fear of childbirth and depressive symptoms among pregnant women: a cross-sectional survey in Pwani region, Tanzania

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Fredrick Massae ◽  
Margareta Larsson ◽  
Sebalda Leshabari ◽  
Columba Mbekenga ◽  
Andrea Barnabas Pembe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Male Partner ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Obstetric Complications ◽  
Fear Of Childbirth ◽  
Perineal Tear ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pregnancy And Childbirth

Abstract Background Many women experience fear of childbirth (FoB) and depressive symptoms (DS) during pregnancy, but little is known about FoB among Tanzanian women. The current study aimed to assess the prevalence of FoB and DS among pregnant women and determine predictors of each and both, focusing on sociodemographic and obstetric predictors. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted at six health facilities in two districts in Tanzania between 2018 and 2019. In total, 694 pregnant women with gestational age between 32 and 40 weeks and expecting vaginal delivery were consecutively recruited and assessed for FoB and DS. We collected data through interviews using 6 and 4-points Likert Scale of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire Version A and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, respectively. Women who scored ≥66 and ≥ 10 were categorised as having FoB and DS, respectively. We performed multivariable logistic regression to investigate the predictors of FoB and DS. Results The prevalence rates of FoB and DS among pregnant women were 15.1 and 17.7%, respectively. FoB and DS were more likely in women aged above 30 years [Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 6.29, 95%CI 1.43–27.84] and in single mothers (AOR 2.57, 95%CI 1.14–5.78). Women with secondary education and above (AOR 0.22, 95%CI 0.05–0.99) and those who had given birth previously (AOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09–0.87) were less likely to have FoB in combination with DS Women who had previous obstetric complications, and those who did not receive any social support from male partners in previous childbirth were more likely to have FoB and DS. FoB was strongly associated with DS (AOR 3.42, 95%CI 2.12–5.53). DS only was more common in women who had inadequate income (AOR 2.35, 95%CI 1.38–3.99) or had previously experienced a perineal tear (AOR 2.32, 95%CI 1.31–4.08). Conclusions Not having a formal education, having only primary education, being aged above 30 years, being single, being nulliparous, having experienced obstetric complications, and having a lack of social support from a male partner during previous pregnancy and childbirth were predictors of FoB and DS during pregnancy. FoB and DS were strongly associated with each other. It is vital to identify at-risk women early, to offer support during pregnancy and childbirth.

scholarly journals Identifying fear of childbirth in a UK population: qualitative examination of the clarity and acceptability of existing measurement tools in a small UK sample

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Slade ◽  
K. Balling ◽  
K. Sheen ◽  
G. Houghton
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Cognitive Interview ◽  
Fear Of Childbirth ◽  
Infant Outcomes ◽  
General Anxiety ◽  
Measurement Tools ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Specific Fear ◽  
Maternal And Infant Outcomes

Abstract Background Fear of childbirth is related to but not synonymous with general anxiety, and represents a superior predictor for maternal and infant outcomes. There is a need to improve the identification and provision of support for women experiencing high fear of childbirth. However it is uncertain as to whether existing measurement tools have appropriate content validity (i.e. cover the relevant domains within the construct), practical utility, and whether they are acceptable for use with a UK population. This study aimed to (1) identify the utility and acceptability of existing measures of fear of childbirth (FOC) with a small UK sample and (2) map the content of existing measures to the key concepts of fear of childbirth established by previous research. Methods Ten pregnant women; five with high and five with low fear of childbirth participated in a cognitive interview covering four most commonly used measures of fear of childbirth: 1. The Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (WDEQ A), 2. The Oxford Worries about Labour Scale (OWLS), 3. The Slade-Pais Expectations of Childbirth Scale – fear subscale (SPECS) and 4. The Fear of Birth scale (FOBS). Each measure was also reviewed by participants for ease and clarity of understanding and acceptability. The measures were then reviewed against the key domains identified in the fear of childbirth literature to ascertain the adequacy of content validity of each measure. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis for each scale item. Results All measures except the FOBS, included items that either women did not understand or, if where there was understanding the meanings were inconsistent across women. All measures demonstrated limited acceptability and content validity for the specific construct of FOC. Therefore, none of the measurement tools currently used within the UK met criteria for understanding, acceptability and content validity for measurement of FOC. Conclusions Findings emphasise a need to develop a specific fear of childbirth tool with good clarity which demonstrates appropriate content validity, and that is acceptable in presentation and length for pregnant women in a UK population.

Promoting positive motherhood among nulliparous pregnant women with an intense fear of childbirth: RCT intervention

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 520-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katariina Salmela-Aro ◽  
Sanna Read ◽  
Hanna Rouhe ◽  
Erja Halmesmäki ◽  
Riikka Maria Toivanen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Late Pregnancy ◽  
Positive Parenting ◽  
Fear Of Childbirth ◽  
Education Group ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Intense Fear ◽  
Group Sessions ◽  
And Control

This RCT intervention among nulliparous pregnant women with an intense fear of childbirth sought to promote preparedness for childbirth and to enhance positive parenting. Pregnant women (n = 8,611) filled in a ‘fear of childbirth’ questionnaire. Nulliparous women with severe fear of childbirth (n = 355) were randomized into intervention (n = 131; 41 refused) and control (n = 224) groups. They rated themselves on a preparedness scale in middle and late pregnancy, and on a motherhood scale three months after childbirth. The intervention included six psycho-education group sessions during pregnancy and one after childbirth. This intervention increased the mothers’ preparedness for childbirth, which predicted an increase in positive motherhood.

scholarly journals Fear of Childbirth and Depressive Symptoms Among Pregnant Women: A Cross-sectional Survey in Tanzania

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Massae ◽  
Agneta Svanberg ◽  
Margareta Larsson ◽  
Andrea Pembe ◽  
Sebalda Leshabari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Male Partner ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Obstetric Complications ◽  
Fear Of Childbirth ◽  
Perineal Tear ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pregnancy And Childbirth

Abstract Background: Many women experience fear of childbirth (FoB) and depressive symptoms (DS) during pregnancy, but little is known about FoB among Tanzanian women. The current study aimed to assess the prevalence of FoB and DS among pregnant women and determine predictors of each and both, focusing on sociodemographic and obstetric predictors.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at six health facilities in two districts in Tanzania between 2018 and 2019. In total, 694 pregnant women with gestational age between 32 and 40 weeks and expecting vaginal delivery were consecutively recruited and assessed for FoB and DS. We collected data through interviews using the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire Version A and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. We performed multivariable logistic regression to investigate the predictors of FoB and DS. Results: The prevalence rates of FoB and DS among pregnant women were 15.1% and 17.7%, respectively. FoB and DS were more likely in women aged above 30 years (AOR 6.29, 95% CI 1.43–27.84) and in single mothers (AOR 2.57, 95% CI 1.14–5.78). Women with secondary education and above and those who had given birth previously were less likely to have FoB (AOR 0.22, 95%CI 0.05–0.99) and DS (AOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.01–0.87). Women who had previous obstetric complications, and those who did not receive any social support from male partners in previous childbirth were more likely to have FoB and DS. FoB was strongly associated with DS (AOR 3.42, 95% CI 21.20–5.53). DS only was more common in women who had inadequate income (AOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.38–3.99) or had previously experienced a perineal tear (AOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.31–4.08).Conclusions: Not having a formal education, having only primary education, being aged above 30 years, being single, being nulliparous, having experienced obstetric complications, and having a lack of social support from a male partner during previous pregnancy and childbirth were predictors of FoB and DS during pregnancy. FoB and DS were strongly associated with each other. It is vital to identify at-risk women early, to offer support during pregnancy and childbirth.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document