Electrokinetic Remediation of Soil Contaminated with Diesel Oil Using EDTA–Cosolvent Solutions

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 2437-2454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyoyeol Han ◽  
You-Jin Lee ◽  
Seong-Hye Kim ◽  
Ji-Won Yang
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Oil ◽  
Electrokinetic Remediation ◽  
Remediation Of Soil

Laboratory Experiment on Electrokinetic Remediation of Soil

2011 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 1126-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alya H. Elsayed-Ali ◽  
Tarek Abdel-Fattah ◽  
Hani E. Elsayed-Ali
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Experiment ◽  
Electrokinetic Remediation ◽  
Remediation Of Soil

scholarly journals Chemical remediation technologies

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Tijana Jovanovic ◽  
Milica Petrovic ◽  
Milos Kostic ◽  
Danijela Bojic ◽  
Aleksandar Bojic
Keyword(s):  
Soil Washing ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Chemical Oxidation ◽  
Electrokinetic Remediation ◽  
Appropriate Technology ◽  
Contaminated Sites ◽  
Site Conditions ◽  
Efficient Technology ◽  
Remediation Of Soil

Environmental pollution remains one of the most serious world problems. Great efforts are made to limit the release of harmful compounds into the environment, and a variety of methods for remediation of soil, surface water, and groundwater have been developed over the years. Chemical remediation technologies are of great interest since they can remove and degrade pollutants in contaminated sites. This paper focuses on several chemical remediation technologies, such as precipitation, flocculation, adsorption and ion exchange, chemical oxidation, soil washing and flushing, and electrokinetic remediation. Remediation technologies are almost always combined one with another, although they can be used separately. Choosing an appropriate technology will depend on the type of the pollutants and site conditions, and it should be done in such a manner so that the most cost-effective and efficient technology is chosen. Even though some of the technologies are used full-scale, research should be focused on enhancing the existing, and developing new remediation technologies.

Remediation of soil contaminated with diesel oil

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jadwiga Wyszkowska ◽  
Jadwiga Wyszkowska ◽  
Agata Borowik
Keyword(s):  
Diesel Oil ◽  
Remediation Of Soil

Electrokinetic remediation of soil containing Cr(VI) by photovoltaic solar panels and a DC-DC converter

2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunxi Zhang ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Xianzhong Cheng ◽  
Yunjun Mei ◽  
Chun Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrokinetic Remediation ◽  
Solar Panels ◽  
Remediation Of Soil

scholarly journals An Efficient Biosurfactant by Pseudomonas stutzeri Z12 Isolated from an Extreme Environment for Remediation of Soil Contaminated with Hydrocarbons

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudabeh Pourfadakari ◽  
Sahand Jorfi ◽  
Shokooh Ghafari
Keyword(s):  
Critical Micelle Concentration ◽  
Contact Time ◽  
Chemical Structure ◽  
Pseudomonas Stutzeri ◽  
Extreme Environment ◽  
Diesel Oil ◽  
Oily Sludge ◽  
Operating Parameters ◽  
Emulsification Index ◽  
Remediation Of Soil

Capability of a biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas stutzeri Z12 for the removal of hydrocarbons from oily sludge contaminated soil was investigated. The effect of operating parameters, including pH, critical micelle concentration (CMC), salinity, and contact time were studied. The chemical structure of produced biosurfactant was characterized using FTIR and LC-MS-MS analysis, which revealed that the extracted biosurfactant was a combination of both mono- and di-rhamnolipid congeners. The main three congeners RhaC12:1C10 (529.9 m z–1), RhaC12C10 (531 m z–1), and RhaC10C10 (503.2 m z–1)<br /> were associated to mono-rhamnolipid, while five congeners, RhaRhaC10C8 (621.2 m z–1), RhaRhaC12C12 (707.7), RhaRhaC10C12 (677.1), RhaRhaC10C12:1 (675.3 m z–1), and RhaRhaC10C1 (649.5 m z–1) were associated to di-rhamnolipid structures. The critical micelle concentration (CMC) was 80 mg L–1, and emulsification index (E24) values for n-hexadecane, n-hexane, kerosene, diesel oil, xylene, and crude oil were 62.1, 57.6, 54.4, 41.5, 46.9, and 30.2 %, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document