Thermoregulation in the nest of the Neotropical Stingless beeScaptotrigona postiçaand a hypothesis on the evolution of temperature homeostasis in highly Eusocial bees

1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolf Engels ◽  
Peter Rosenkranz ◽  
Elisabeth Engels
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robbie I’Anson Price ◽  
Francisca Segers ◽  
Amelia Berger ◽  
Fabio S Nascimento ◽  
Christoph Grüter

Abstract Social information is widely used in the animal kingdom and can be highly adaptive. In social insects, foragers can use social information to find food, avoid danger or choose a new nest site. Copying others allows individuals to obtain information without having to sample the environment. When foragers communicate information they will often only advertise high quality food sources, thereby filtering out less adaptive information. Stingless bees, a large pantropical group of highly eusocial bees, face intense inter- and intra-specific competition for limited resources, yet display disparate foraging strategies. Within the same environment there are species that communicate the location of food resources to nest-mates and species that do not. Our current understanding of why some species communicate foraging sites while others do not is limited. Studying freely foraging colonies of several co-existing stingless bee species in Brazil, we investigated if recruitment to specific food locations is linked to (1) the sugar content of forage, (2) the duration of foraging trips and (3) the variation in activity of a colony from one day to another and the variation in activity in a species over a day. We found that, contrary to our expectations, species with recruitment communication did not return with higher quality forage than species that do not recruit nestmates. Furthermore, foragers from recruiting species did not have shorter foraging trip durations than those from weakly-recruiting species. Given the intense inter- and intraspecific competition for resources in these environments, it may be that recruiting species favour food resources that can be monopolised by the colony rather than food sources that offer high-quality rewards.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (08) ◽  
pp. 561-564
Author(s):  
Hannah Wilson ◽  
Caroline McGuiness ◽  
Marc Swan

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (36) ◽  
pp. 9731-9736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rigo Cintron-Colon ◽  
Manuel Sanchez-Alavez ◽  
William Nguyen ◽  
Simone Mori ◽  
Ruben Gonzalez-Rivera ◽  
...  

When food resources are scarce, endothermic animals can lower core body temperature (Tb). This phenomenon is believed to be part of an adaptive mechanism that may have evolved to conserve energy until more food becomes available. Here, we found in the mouse that the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) controls this response in the central nervous system. Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of IGF-1R enhanced the reduction of temperature and of energy expenditure during calorie restriction. Full blockade of IGF-1R affected female and male mice similarly. In contrast, genetic IGF-1R dosage was effective only in females, where it also induced transient and estrus-specific hypothermia in animals fed ad libitum. These effects were regulated in the brain, as only central, not peripheral, pharmacological activation of IGF-1R prevented hypothermia during calorie restriction. Targeted IGF-1R knockout selectively in forebrain neurons revealed that IGF signaling also modulates calorie restriction-dependent Tbregulation in regions rostral of the canonical hypothalamic nuclei involved in controlling body temperature. In aggregate, these data identify central IGF-1R as a mediator of the integration of nutrient and temperature homeostasis. They also show that calorie restriction, IGF-1R signaling, and body temperature, three of the main regulators of metabolism, aging, and longevity, are components of the same pathway.


FEBS Letters ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 590 (7) ◽  
pp. 982-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christelle Bertrand-Gaday ◽  
Laurence Pessemesse ◽  
Gérard Cabello ◽  
Chantal Wrutniak-Cabello ◽  
François Casas

2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeleine Beekman ◽  
Benjamin P. Oldroyd

Endocrinology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 146 (7) ◽  
pp. 2872-2884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Husnia Marrif ◽  
Aria Schifman ◽  
Zaruhi Stepanyan ◽  
Marc-Antoine Gillis ◽  
Angelino Calderone ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hans Ijzerman ◽  
Lotje J. Hogerzeil

This chapter examines the importance of thermoregulation for the human need to belong and for social integration more generally. It considers fundamental patterns in how thermoregulation relates to social cognition, and how—as a result—more complex social integration affects our core body temperatures. This perspective implies that humans are, in one important way, just like penguins: they need warmth and a good huddle when they are cold in order to survive. Yet temperature affects humans’ social behavior in even more complex ways. The chapter discusses some basics mechanisms of thermoregulation and provides various examples of how social thermoregulation extends to modern human behavior. It also discusses the neural organization of thermoregulation, how temperature homeostasis is maintained even via inanimate objects, and speculates about the link between relationships and the development of self-regulation. It concludes with an analysis of the implications of understanding thermoregulation as human essence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document