STEAM views from a need: the case of the chewing gum and pH sensopill (Miradas STEAM desde la necesidad: el caso de la sensopíldora chicles y pH)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-33
Author(s):  
Luisa López-Banet ◽  
F.-Javier Perales ◽  
M. Rut Jimenez-Liso
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judge Karla Fultz ◽  
Todd Beveridge
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Dr.Randa Mohammed AboBaker

Postoperative Ileus (POI) is one of the most common problems after obstetrics, gynecologic and abdominal surgeries. Sham feeding, such as gum chewing, accelerates the return of bowel function and the length of hospital stay. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of chewing gum on bowel motility in women undergoing post-operative cesarean section. Intervention study was used at the Postpartum Department of Maternity and Children Hospital, KSA. A randomized controlled clinical trial research design. Through a convenience technique, 80 post Caesarian Section (CS) women were included in the study. Data were collected through three tools: Tool (I): Socio-demographic data and reproductive history interview schedule. Tool (II): Postoperative Assessment Sheet. Tool (III): Outcomes of gum chewing and the length of hospital stay.  Method: subjects were assigned randomly into two groups of (40) the experimental and (40) the control. Subjects in the study group were asked to chew two pieces of sugarless gum for 30 min/three times daily in the morning, noon, and evening immediately after recovery from anesthesia and in Postpartum Department; while subjects in the control group followed the hospital routine care. Each woman in both groups was tested abdominally using a stethoscope to auscultate the bowel sounds and asked to report immediately the time of either passing flatus or stool. Results: illustrated that a highly statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning their gum chewing outcomes. Where, P = 0.000. The study concluded that gum chewing is safe, well tolerated and appears to be effective in reducing the incidence and consequences of POI following CS.


2002 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirohito Umeno ◽  
Sachiyo Hamakawa ◽  
Kyujirou Gondoh ◽  
Hidetaka Shirouzu ◽  
Yoshikazu Yoshida ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 18-21
Author(s):  
E. Blynskaya ◽  
S. Tishkov ◽  
V. Bueva ◽  
K. Alekseev ◽  
V. Alekseev ◽  
...  

Medicated chewing gum is a convenient dosage form that allows to expand the range of medicines, ensure adherence of patients to the treatment and extend patent protection for well-known names of medicines. This article describes the technological properties of the Health in Gum® chewing gum base, which provides medicinal chewing gums with minimal addition of excipients by direct compression.


BMJ ◽  
1913 ◽  
Vol 1 (2721) ◽  
pp. 416-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kerr
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 272-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuray Ercan ◽  
Ebru Olgun Erdemir ◽  
Serdar Yucel Ozkan ◽  
Meltem Karsiyaka Hendek

ABSTRACT Objective: In general, chemical plaque agents have been used in mouthwashes, gels, and dentifrices. In some situations, application of mouthwashes and dentifrices can be difficult. Therefore, different approaches for oral health-care have been needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of propolis chewing-gum compared to propolis-containing mouthwash on gingival inflammation and plaque accumulation on patients that refrained from daily oral hygiene procedures for 5 days. Materials and Methods: 10 college students with systemically healthy and very good oral hygiene and gingival health were included in this randomized, single-blind, crossover 5-day plaque regrowth with a 3-day washout period clinical study. After plaque scores were reduced to zero, participants were asked to refrain from oral hygiene procedures and allocated to either propolis mouthwash or chewing-gum group. Chewing-gum was performed after meals 3 times a day for 20 min mouthwash group was instructed to rinse mouthwash 2 times a day for 1 min. On day 5, the clinical periodontal measurements containing plaque and gingival indexes were taken from the participants. Results: The both plaque and gingival indexes of propolis mouthwash group were significantly lower than that of the propolis chewing-gum group (P = 0.005). Conclusion: It was demonstrated that the propolis mouthwash was more effective than the propolis chewing gum on the plaque inhibition and the gingival inflammation.


Author(s):  
Samiullah Bhatti ◽  
Yusra Jahangir Malik ◽  
Shabbar Hussain Changazi ◽  
Usman Ali Rahman ◽  
Awais Amjad Malik ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 131 ◽  
Author(s):  
UdayVenkat Mateti ◽  
Thiyagu Rajakannan ◽  
Nagesh Adla ◽  
Rajesh Valakkathala

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 237-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Sketchley-Kaye ◽  
Rebecca Jenks ◽  
Christopher Miles ◽  
Andrew J Johnson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document