Distribution-free statistical hypotheses testing for stochastic processes

Optimization ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 643-656
Author(s):  
R. Ahmad
2018 ◽  
pp. 110-114
Author(s):  
Evgueni Haroutunian ◽  
Aram Yesayan ◽  
Narine Harutyunyan

Multiple statistical hypotheses testing with possibility of rejecting of decisionis considered for model consisting of two dependent objects characterized by joint discrete probability distribution. The matrix of error probabilities exponents (reliabilities) of asymptotically optimal tests is studied.


Author(s):  
K. J. KACHIASHVILI

There are different methods of statistical hypotheses testing.1–4 Among them, is Bayesian approach. A generalization of Bayesian rule of many hypotheses testing is given below. It consists of decision rule dimensionality with respect to the number of tested hypotheses, which allows to make decisions more differentiated than in the classical case and to state, instead of unconstrained optimization problem, constrained one that enables to make guaranteed decisions concerning errors of true decisions rejection, which is the key point when solving a number of practical problems. These generalizations are given both for a set of simple hypotheses, each containing one space point, and hypotheses containing a finite set of separated space points.


Author(s):  
Timo Kuosmanen ◽  
Natalia Kuosmanen

Sustainable Value Analysis (SVA) [F. Figge, T. Hahn, Ecol. Econ. 48(2004) 173-187] is a method formeasuring sustainability performance consistent with the constant capital rule and strongsustainability. SVA compares eco-efficiency of a firm relative to some benchmark. The choice of thebenchmark implies some assumptions regarding the underlying production technology. This paperpresents a rigorous examination of the role of benchmark technology in SVA. We show that Figge andHahn’s formula for calculating sustainable value implies a peculiar linear benchmark technology. Wepresent a generalized formulation of sustainable value that is not restricted to any particular functionalform and allows for estimating benchmark technology from empirical data. Our generalized SVAformulation reveals a direct link between SVA and frontier approaches to environmental performancemeasurement and facilitates statistical hypotheses testing concerning the benchmark.


Filomat ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-688
Author(s):  
Farshin Hormozinejad

In this article the author considers the statistical hypotheses testing to make decision among hypotheses concerning many families of probability distributions. The statistician would like to control the overall error rate relative to draw statistically valid conclusions from each test, while being as efficient as possible. The familywise error (FWE) rate metric and the hypothesis test procedure while controlling both the type I and II FWEs are generalized. The proposed procedure shows simultaneous more reliability and less conservative error control relative to fixed sample and other recently proposed sequential procedures. Also, the characteristics of logarithmically asymptotically optimal (LAO) hypotheses testing are studied. The purpose of research is to express the optimal functional relation among the reliabilities of LAO hypotheses testing and to judge with FWE metric.


2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 14-24
Author(s):  
F. V. Motsnyi

In the statistical analysis of experimental results it is extremely important to know the distribution laws of the general population. ‎Because of all assumptions about the distribution laws are statistical hypotheses, they should be tested. ‎Testing hypotheses are carried out by using the statistical criteria that divided the multitude in two subsets: null and alternative. The ‎null hypothesis is accepted in subset null and is rejected in alternative subset. Knowledge of the distribution law is a prerequisite for the use of numerical mathematical methods. The hypothesis is accepted if the divergence between empirical and theoretical distributions will be random. The hypothesis is rejected if the divergence between empirical and theoretical distributions will be essential. There is a number of different agreement criteria for the statistical hypotheses testing. The paper continues ideas of the author’s works, devoted to advanced based tools of the mathematical statistics. This part of the paper is devoted to nonparametric agreement criteria. Nonparametric tests don’t allow us to include in calculations the parameters of the probability distribution and to operate with frequency only, as well as to assume directly that the experimental data have a specific distribution. Nonparametric criteria are widely used in analysis of the empirical data, in the testing of the simple and complex statistical hypotheses etc. They include the well known criteria of K. Pearson, A. Kolmogorov, N. H. Kuiper, G. S. Watson, T. W. Anderson, D. A. Darling, J. Zhang, Mann – Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and so on. Pearson and Kolmogorov criteria are most frequently used in mathematical statistics. Pearson criterion (-criterion) is the universal statistical nonparametric criterion which has -distribution. It is used for the testing of the null hypothesis about subordination of the distribution of sample empirical to theory of general population at large amounts of sample (n>50). Pearson criterion is connected with calculation of theoretical frequency. Kolmogorov criterion is used for comparing empirical and theoretical distributions and permits to find the point in which the difference between these distributions is maximum and statistically reliable. Kolmogorov criterion is used at large amounts of sample too. It should be noted, that the results obtained by using Pearson criterion are more precise because practically all experimental data are used. The peculiarities of Pearson and Kolmogorov criteria are found out. The formulas for calculations are given and the typical tasks are suggested and solved. The typical tasks are suggested and solved that help us to understand more deeply the essence of Pearson and Kolmogorov criteria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document