The effect of self-assessment on academic performance and the role of explicitness: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Zi Yan ◽  
Xiang Wang ◽  
David Boud ◽  
Hongling Lao
Keyword(s):  
Academic Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Self Assessment

scholarly journals The Impact of Self-assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1151-1166
Author(s):  
Pınar Karaman
Keyword(s):  
Academic Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Analysis Study ◽  
External Feedback ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Impact

This meta-analysis study synthesizing the results of experimental and quasi experimental studies examined the effects of self-assessment interventions on student academic performance from primary education to higher education. A total of 16 studies with 46 effect sizes involving more than 7,650 participants were included in the analysis. Research synthesis showed that an overall small influence of self-assessment interventions on academic performance (g=.37, p .05). Additionally, moderator analysis was used to examine moderating effects of some variables. The analysis indicated that traditional self-assessment interventions without external feedback have significantly a larger effect (g =.47, p.05) than self-assessment with external feedback (g=.28, p.05) on academic performance. However, effectiveness of other moderating variables (e.g. education level, assessment criteria type, self-assessment training) on academic performance were not statistically significant. The results suggest that further empirical studies are needed to reveal the moderating effects of self-assessment.

Role of an Academic Performance Committee

1969 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-104
Author(s):  
JC Hickey ◽  
MT Romano ◽  
RK Jarecky
Keyword(s):  
Academic Performance

Chronic Pain: Fundamental Scientific Considerations, Specifically for Legal Claims

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barth
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Driving Forces ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Problematic Relationship

Abstract Scientific findings have indicated that psychological and social factors are the driving forces behind most chronic benign pain presentations, especially in a claim context, and are relevant to at least three of the AMA Guides publications: AMA Guides to Evaluation of Disease and Injury Causation, AMA Guides to Work Ability and Return to Work, and AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. The author reviews and summarizes studies that have identified the dominant role of financial, psychological, and other non–general medicine factors in patients who report low back pain. For example, one meta-analysis found that compensation results in an increase in pain perception and a reduction in the ability to benefit from medical and psychological treatment. Other studies have found a correlation between the level of compensation and health outcomes (greater compensation is associated with worse outcomes), and legal systems that discourage compensation for pain produce better health outcomes. One study found that, among persons with carpal tunnel syndrome, claimants had worse outcomes than nonclaimants despite receiving more treatment; another examined the problematic relationship between complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and compensation and found that cases of CRPS are dominated by legal claims, a disparity that highlights the dominant role of compensation. Workers’ compensation claimants are almost never evaluated for personality disorders or mental illness. The article concludes with recommendations that evaluators can consider in individual cases.

The Effect of Self-Assessment: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 309-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Young Hong ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Self Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document