Test–retest reliability of a new device for assessing ankle joint threshold to detect passive movement in healthy adults

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (16) ◽  
pp. 1667-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Sun ◽  
Qipeng Song ◽  
Bing Yu ◽  
Cui Zhang ◽  
Dewei Mao
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Passive Movement ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
New Device ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Test-Retest Reliability of the StepWatch Activity Monitor Outputs in Healthy Adults

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 671-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzie Mudge ◽  
Denise Taylor ◽  
Oliver Chang ◽  
Rosita Wong
Keyword(s):  
Activity Index ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Objective Measure ◽  
Activity Monitor ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Peak Activity ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Step Rate ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background:Activity Monitors give an objective measure of usual walking performance. This study aimed to examine the test-retest reliability of the StepWatch Activity Monitor outputs (mean steps/day; peak activity index; sustained activity indices of 1, 5, 20, 30, 60 minutes; steps at high, medium, and low stepping rates).Methods:Thirty healthy adults age 18 to 49 years wore the StepWatch for 2 3-day periods at least 1 week apart.Results:The intraclass correlation coefficients of the StepWatch outputs ranged from 0.44 to 0.91 over 3 days. The coefficient of variation ranged from 3.0% to 51.3% over the monitoring periods, with higher variation shown for shorter monitoring periods. The most reliable 5 outputs had 95% limits of agreement between 3-day periods that were less than 40%. These were mean steps/day (±39.1%), highest step rate in 1 (±17.3%) and 5 (±37.4%) minutes, peak activity index (±25.6%), and percentage of inactive time (±9.52%).Conclusions:Mean steps/day, highest step rate in 1 and 5 minutes, peak activity index, and percentage of inactive time have good test-retest reliability over a 3-day monitoring period, with lower reliability shown by the other StepWatch outputs. Monitoring over 1 or 2 days is less reliable.

Test-Retest Reliability and Practice Effects of the Stability Evaluation Test

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richelle M. Williams ◽  
Matthew A. Corvo ◽  
Kenneth C. Lam ◽  
Travis A. Williams ◽  
Lesley K. Gilmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postural Control ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Composite Score ◽  
Practice Effects ◽  
Stability Evaluation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Evaluation Test ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Context: Postural control plays an essential role in concussion evaluation. The Stability Evaluation Test (SET) aims to objectively analyze postural control by measuring sway velocity on the NeuroCom VSR portable force platform (Natus, San Carlos, CA). Objective: To assess the test-retest reliability and practice effects of the SET protocol. Design: Cohort. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: 50 healthy adults (20 men, 30 women, age 25.30 ± 3.60 y, height 166.60± 12.80 cm, mass 68.80 ± 13.90 kg). Interventions: All participants completed 4 trials of the SET. Each trial consisted of six 20-s balance tests with eyes closed, under the following conditions: double-leg firm (DFi), single-leg firm (SFi), tandem firm (TFi), double-leg foam (DFo), single-leg foam (SFo), and tandem foam (TFo). Each trial was separated by a 5-min seated rest period. Main Outcome Measures: The dependent variable was sway velocity (deg/s), with lower values indicating better balance. Sway velocity was recorded for each of the 6 conditions as well as a composite score for each trial. Test-retest reliability was analyzed across 4 trials with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Practice effects analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance, followed by Tukey post hoc comparisons for any significant main effects (P < .05). Results: Sway-velocity reliability values were good to excellent: DFi (ICC = .88; 95%CI: .81, .92), SFi (ICC = .75; 95%CI: .61, .85), TFi (ICC = .84; 95%CI: .75, .90), DFo (ICC = .83; 95%CI: .74, .90), SFo (ICC = .82; 95%CI: .72, .89), TFo (ICC = .81; 95%CI: .69, .88), and composite score (ICC = .93; 95%CI: .88, .95). Significant practice effects (P < .05) were noted on the SFi, DFo, SFo, TFo conditions and composite scores. Conclusions: Our results suggest the SET has good to excellent reliability for the assessment of postural control in healthy adults. Due to the practice effects noted, a familiarization session is recommended (ie, all 6 conditions) before data are recorded. Future studies should evaluate injured patients to determine meaningful change scores during various injuries.

scholarly journals The test-retest reliability of four functional mobility tests in apparently healthy adults

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Northgraves ◽  
Stephen C. Hayes ◽  
Philip Marshall ◽  
Leigh A. Madden ◽  
Rebecca V. Vince
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Functional Mobility ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Apparently Healthy

scholarly journals Test–Retest Reliability of a New Device Versus a Long-Arm Goniometer to Evaluate Knee Proprioception

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Fei Tian ◽  
Yaqi Zhao ◽  
Jixin Li ◽  
Wenjin Wang ◽  
Danni Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Error ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
New Device ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Context: Many methods used to evaluate knee proprioception have shortcomings that limit their use in clinical settings. Based on an inexpensive 3D camera, a new portable device was recently used to evaluate the joint position sense (JPS) of the knee joint. However, the test–retest reliability of the new method remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the test–retest reliability of the new device and a long-arm goniometer for assessing knee JPS, and to compare the variability of the 2 methods. Design: Prospective observational study of the test–retest reliability of knee JPS measurements. Methods: Twenty-one healthy adults were tested in 2 sessions with a 1-week interval. Three target knee flexion angles (30°, 45°, and 60°) were reproduced in each session. Target and reproduced angles were measured with both methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of the measurement, and Bland–Altman plots were used to quantify test–retest reliability. Paired t tests were used to compare knee JPS (absolute error of the target-reproduced angle) between the methods. Results: The new device (good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients .74–.80; standard error of the measurement 0.52°–0.61°) demonstrated better test–retest reliability than the goniometer (poor to fair intraclass correlation coefficients .23–.43; standard error of the measurement 0.89°–2.07°) and better test–retest agreement (respective mean differences for the 30°, 45°, and 60° knee angles: 0.11°, 0.13°, and 0.41° for the new system; 0.84°, 1.52°, and 1.18° for the goniometer). The measurements (absolute errors of the target-reproduced angles) with the goniometer were significantly greater than those with the new device (P < .05); the SDs of repeated measurements with the goniometer (1.50°–2.41°) were greater than with the new device (1.08°–1.38°). Conclusions: Given that the new device has good reliability and sufficient precision, it is the better alternative for evaluating knee JPS. Goniometers should be used with caution to assess knee JPS.

Reliability and Validity of Instrumented Soccer Equipment

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Akins ◽  
Nicholas R. Heebner ◽  
Mita Lovalekar ◽  
Timothy C. Sell
Keyword(s):  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Joint Kinematics ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Lower Extremity Injury ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Ankle ligament sprains are the most common injury in soccer. The high rate of these injuries demonstrates a need for novel data collection methodologies. Therefore, soccer shoes and shin guards were instrumented with inertial sensors to measure ankle joint kinematics in the field. The purpose of this study was to assess test-retest reliability and concurrent criterion validity of a kinematic assessment using the instrumented soccer equipment. Twelve soccer athletes performed athletic maneuvers in the laboratory and field during 2 sessions. In the laboratory, ankle joint kinematics were simultaneously measured with the instrumented equipment and a conventional motion analysis system. Reliability was assessed using ICC and validity was assessed using correlation coefficients and RMSE. While our design criteria of good test-retest reliability was not supported (ICC > .80), sagittal plane ICCs were mostly fair to good and similar to motion analysis results; and sagittal plane data were valid (r = .90−.98; RMSE < 5°). Frontal and transverse plane data were not valid (r < .562; RMSE > 3°). Our results indicate that the instrumented soccer equipment can be used to measure sagittal plane ankle joint kinematics. Biomechanical studies support the utility of sagittal plane measures for lower extremity injury prevention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document