Stereotactic brain biopsy: an audit of sampling reliabilityin a clinical case series

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Shastri-Hurst ◽  
M Tsegaye ◽  
D. K. Robson ◽  
J. S. Lowe ◽  
D. C. Macarthur
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhexi He ◽  
Xian Lun Zhu ◽  
Tat Ming Danny Chan ◽  
Chi Yan Tom Cheung ◽  
Ho-Keung Ng ◽  
...  

Abstract PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of frameless stereotactic brain biopsy and review the era for improvement.MethodsThis is a prospectively collected cohort study from 2007 to 2020. We reviewed patients who received frameless stereotactic brain biopsy in Prince of Wales Hospital and evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the frameless stereotactic brain biopsy procedures. The biopsy result was classified into conclusive, inconclusive or negative, based on the pathological, radiological and clinical diagnosis concordance. For inconclusive or negative results, we further evaluated the pre-operative planning and post-operative imaging to review if further improvement could be made. The complication rate of symptomatic hemorrhage and mortality rate was also analyzed.ResultsThere were 106 patients with 109 biopsy procedures performed from 2007 to 2020. The conclusive diagnosis was reached in 103 (94.5%) procedures. The inconclusive diagnosis was noted in four (3.7%) procedures and negative diagnosis was yielded in two (1.9%) procedures. Symptomatic hemorrhage was noted in one patient (0.9%). There was no mortality case (0.0%) in our case series. The registration errors occurred in three cases (2.8%), sampling of the non-representative part of the lesion occurred in two cases (1.8%), and one biopsy (0.9%) for lymphoma was negative after the commencement of steroids. Systemic review showed that the diagnostic accuracy under the structurally defined diagnosis criteria was comparable with published literatures in recent ten years.ConclusionThe stereotactic biopsy is a safe procedure with high diagnostic accuracy only if meticulous pre-operative planning and careful intra-operative registration is performed. The common pitfalls precluding a conclusive diagnosis are errors during registration and non-representative biopsy sites.


Author(s):  
Frederik Enders ◽  
Andreas Rothfuss ◽  
Stefanie Brehmer ◽  
Jan Stallkamp ◽  
Dirk Michael Schulte ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The preoperative preparation of the planning dataset for frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy is often associated with logistical effort and burden on the patient. Intraoperative imaging modalities need to be investigated to overcome these limitations. Objective The objective of the study was to develop and apply a new method for the intraoperative acquisition of the planning dataset with the multiaxial robotic C-arm system Artis zeego. Methods An indication-customized dose-reduced protocol for Artis zeego was developed and implemented into the workflow. A sample of 14 patients who had undergone intraoperative imaging with Artis zeego was analyzed. A sample of 10 patients with conventional preoperative imaging by cranial computed tomography (CT) was used as a control group. Outcomes were compared with regard to target deviation, diagnostic value of the biopsies, complications, and procedure time. Results In all patients, a suitable intraoperative planning dataset could be acquired with Artis zeego. Total procedure time was shorter for the Artis zeego group (p = 0.01), whereas time in the operating room area was longer in the Artis zeego group (p = 0.04). Biopsy results were diagnostic in 12 patients (86%) in the Artis zeego group and in 8 patients (80%) in the control group. There were no significant differences in target size, trajectory length, or target deviation. Conclusion Intraoperative imaging for frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy with Artis zeego is an easy and feasible method. Accuracy is comparable to conventional CT, whereas radiation exposure could be additionally reduced. It allows a significant reduction of the total procedure length and improves the comfort for the patient and staff.


Author(s):  
Pier Poli ◽  
Francisley Avila Souza ◽  
Mattia Manfredini ◽  
Carlo Maiorana ◽  
Mario Beretta

Not required for Clinical case letters according to the authors' guidelines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 1405-1412
Author(s):  
Minxin Ye ◽  
Weibing Li ◽  
Danny Tat Ming Chan ◽  
Philip Wai Yan Chiu ◽  
Zheng Li

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Chernov ◽  
Yoshihiro Muragaki ◽  
Takaomi Taira ◽  
Hiroshi Iseki

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1531-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rania GA Elenein ◽  
Leroy R Sharer ◽  
Stuart D Cook ◽  
Andrew R Pachner ◽  
Jennifer Michaels ◽  
...  

Marburg’s variant of multiple sclerosis is a rapidly progressive and malignant form of multiple sclerosis (MS) that usually leads to severe disability or death within weeks to months without remission. Few cases have been described in the literature since the original description by Marburg. The classic pathological findings usually include highly destructive zones of extensive demyelination, necrosis with dense cellular infiltrate, and giant reactive astrocytes. We report a case of a 31-year-old woman with Marburg’s variant of MS who, over a period of eight months, became totally disabled, blind, and quadriplegic, with vocal cord paralysis, requiring a tracheostomy. The patient underwent diagnostic stereotactic brain biopsy. Clinical findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), serologic and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings, and neuropathology are discussed. MRI showed extensive white matter involvement in the brain and spinal cord that continuously progressed over time. A diagnostic stereotactic brain biopsy revealed extensive active demyelination with unexpected finding of active vasculitis and fibrinoid necrosis with a vascular inflammatory cell infiltrate, including polymorphonuclear neutrophils and rare eosinophils. Serologic work-up for vasculitis and neuromyelitis optica was unremarkable and the CSF showed only one oligoclonal band (OCB) not present in serum. This is the second case of Marburg’s variant of MS that demonstrated both demyelination and vasculitis. In our case these features were demonstrated simultaneously, even though the demyelination was the predominant pathological finding. Since vasculitis is not a feature of classic MS, these findings pose the question as to whether Marburg’s variant of MS is a true variant or different entity altogether.


2006 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme F. Woodworth ◽  
Matthew J. McGirt ◽  
Amer Samdani ◽  
Ira Garonzik ◽  
Alessandro Olivi ◽  
...  

Object The gold standard for stereotactic brain biopsy target localization has been frame-based stereotaxy. Recently, frameless stereotactic techniques have become increasingly utilized. Few authors have evaluated this procedure, analyzed preoperative predictors of diagnostic yield, or explored the differences in diagnostic yield and morbidity rate between the frameless and frame-based techniques. Methods A consecutive series of 110 frameless and 160 frame-based image-guided stereotactic biopsy procedures was reviewed. Associated variables for both techniques were reviewed and compared. All stereotactic biopsy procedures were included in a risk factor analysis of nondiagnostic biopsy sampling. Frameless stereotaxy led to a diagnostic yield of 89%, with a total permanent morbidity rate of 6% and a mortality rate of 1%. Larger lesions were fivefold more likely to yield diagnostic tissues. Deep-seated lesions were 2.7-fold less likely to yield diagnostic tissues compared with cortical lesions. Frameless compared with frame-based stereotactic biopsy procedures showed no significant differences in diagnostic yield or transient or permanent morbidity. For cortical lesions, more than one needle trajectory was required more frequently to obtain diagnostic tissues with frame-based as opposed to frameless stereotaxy, although this factor was not associated with morbidity. Conclusions With regard to diagnostic yield and complication rate, the frameless stereotactic biopsy procedure was found to be comparable to or better than the frame-based method. Smaller and deep-seated lesions together were risk factors for a nondiagnostic tissue yield. Frameless stereotaxy may represent a more efficient means of obtaining biopsy specimens of cortical lesions but is otherwise similar to the frame-based technique.


1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhaya V. Kulkarni ◽  
Abhijit Guha ◽  
Andres Lozano ◽  
Mark Bernstein

Object. Many neurosurgeons routinely obtain computerized tomography (CT) scans to rule out hemorrhage in patients after stereotactic procedures. In the present prospective study, the authors investigated the rate of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic biopsy sampling and the role of postbiopsy CT scanning. Methods. A subset of patients (the last 102 of approximately 800 patients) who underwent stereotactic brain biopsies at the Toronto Hospital prospectively underwent routine postoperative CT scanning within hours of the biopsy procedure. Their medical charts and CT scans were then reviewed. A postoperative CT scan was obtained in 102 patients (aged 17–87 years) who underwent stereotactic biopsy between June 1994 and September 1996. Sixty-one patients (59.8%) exhibited hemorrhages, mostly intracerebral (54.9%), on the immediate postoperative scan. Only six of these patients were clinically suspected to have suffered a hemorrhage based on immediate postoperative neurological deficit; in the remaining 55 (53.9%) of 102 patients, the hemorrhage was clinically silent and unsuspected. Among the clinically silent intracerebral hemorrhages, 22 measured less than 5 mm, 20 between 5 and 10 mm, five between 10 and 30 mm, and four between 30 and 40 mm. Of the 55 patients with clinically silent hemorrhages, only three demonstrated a delayed neurological deficit (one case of seizure and two cases of progressive loss of consciousness) and these all occurred within the first 2 postoperative days. Of the neurologically well patients in whom no hemorrhage was demonstrated on initial postoperative CT scan, none experienced delayed deterioration. Conclusions. Clinically silent hemorrhage after stereotactic biopsy is very common. However, the authors did not find that knowledge of its existence ultimately affected individual patient management or outcome. The authors, therefore, suggest that the most important role of postoperative CT scanning is to screen for those neurologically well patients with no hemorrhage. These patients could safely be discharged on the same day they underwent biopsy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document