Regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis following implant surface decontamination with titanium brush and antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: a case series with reentry

Author(s):  
Pier Poli ◽  
Francisley Avila Souza ◽  
Mattia Manfredini ◽  
Carlo Maiorana ◽  
Mario Beretta

Not required for Clinical case letters according to the authors' guidelines.

Author(s):  
Pier Paolo Poli ◽  
Francisley Ávila Souza ◽  
Giovanni Damiani ◽  
Henrique Hadad ◽  
Carlo Maiorana ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 102105
Author(s):  
Ísis de Fátima Balderrama ◽  
Vitor de Toledo Stuani ◽  
Matheus Völz Cardoso ◽  
Rodrigo Cardoso Oliveira ◽  
Marcelo Milanda Ribeiro Lopes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 76-77
Author(s):  
Nisha Jain ◽  
Rudrax Jindal

The aim of this case series was to assess the efcacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. This case series included two subjects with Presence of pocket depth 6 mm or more with clinical attachment loss(CAL) and bleeding on probing (BOP) in minimum of 1 tooth in atleast two quadrants. After full mouth mechanical debridement (SRP), rst site received no further treatment, whereas, second site was subjected to photodynamic therapy. SRP+PDT group showed signicant improvement in (CAL) and reduction in probing depth as compared to SRP group. Therefore, it can be concluded that Photodynamic therapy has its own advantage as an adjunct to SRP in the non surgical treatment of chronic periodontitis,further research for which may be advocated


Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (13) ◽  
pp. 2073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adel S. Alagl ◽  
Marwa Madi ◽  
Sumit Bedi ◽  
Faisal Al Onaizan ◽  
Zainab S. Al-Aql

Treatment of peri-implantitis through several implant surface decontamination techniques have been reported, however, some of them can negatively alter the implant surface or enhance more bacterial resistance. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate implant surface decontamination by means of Er,Cr:YSGG and diode lasers. Fifty micro-textured (MTX) dental implants were contaminated with Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 25) and with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 25). All implants were then divided into five groups for the decontamination procedure. In group I (GI), decontamination was done with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm), while in group II (GII) decontamination was performed using photodynamic therapy (a 650 nm diode laser). In Group III (GIII) decontamination was performed with photodynamic therapy (an 808 nm diode laser), and in group IV (GIV) decontamination was performed with 0.12% chlorhexidine. Group V (GV) was the control group with no decontamination. After decontamination, colony forming units (CFU) were counted and implants were prepared for SEM analysis. A significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed for GI compared to the other groups, and also for GIV compared to both GII and GIII. The Er,Cr:YSGG laser (GI) showed the best results in decontaminating the implant surface. Chlorhexidine (GIV), proved to be better in decontaminating the implant surface than photodynamic therapy GII and diode laser GIII. No significant difference was found between group GII and GIII. The SEM analysis showed no significant change in the implant surface topography. The results of this study suggest that the Er,Cr:YSGG laser can be considered as an effective technique for reducing bacteria contamination on implant surfaces.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 102070
Author(s):  
Andrea Dias Neves Lago ◽  
Adylla Bianca Coelho Fortes ◽  
Guilherme Silva Furtado ◽  
Carlos Felipe Sousa Menezes ◽  
Letícia Machado Gonçalves

2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 760-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Basilio Okamoto ◽  
Lara Jansiski Motta ◽  
Renato Araujo Prates ◽  
Ana Carolina Costa da Mota ◽  
Marcela Leticia Leal Gonçalves ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Henrique Ribeiro ◽  
Mariana Comparotto Minamisako ◽  
Inês Beatriz da Silva Rath ◽  
Aira Maria Bonfim Santos ◽  
Alyne Simões ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document