A mobile phone as a memory aid for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A preliminary investigation

Brain Injury ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Stapleton ◽  
Malcolm Adams ◽  
Linda Atterton
Brain Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1245-1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Bivona ◽  
A. Costa ◽  
M. Contrada ◽  
D. Silvestro ◽  
E. Azicnuda ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Koole ◽  
Nickola W. Nelson ◽  
Amy B. Curtis

PurposeThis preliminary investigation examined speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') use of contextualized practices (i.e., functional, personally relevant, nonhierarchical, and collaborative) compared with traditional practices (i.e., clinical, generic, hierarchical, and expert driven) with school-age children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI).MethodsAn electronic survey asked SLPs about their use of clinical activities described as more or less contextualized. Research questions focused on frequency of using contextualized practices and factors associated with their use or nonuse.ResultsSeventy responses met criteria for analysis; 98% of these participants reported using at least 1 contextualized practice. Higher use of contextualized practices was associated with working in schools compared to health care settings, access to experts, and greater experience with TBI. Most frequently cited reasons for not using contextualized practices included not fitting the student and scheduling issues.ConclusionsFactors associated with using contextualized practices suggest that access to experts and experience with TBI are critical components for facilitating contextualized practice recommendations. Reasons for not using certain contextualized practices highlight the need to address scheduling issues and to increase education about practices that may best meet the unique needs of students with TBI.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Skye McDonald ◽  
Julia Rosenfeld ◽  
Julie D. Henry ◽  
Leanne Togher ◽  
Robyn Tate ◽  
...  

AbstractPrimary objective:Recent research studies attest to the presence of deficits in emotion perception following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Additionally, a growing number of studies report significant levels of alexithymia (disorder of emotional cognition) following TBI. This research aimed to examine the relation between the two, while assessing the influence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Design:Cross-sectional study examining levels of alexithymia, emotion perception disorders and PTSD and their association, in 20 people with severe, chronic TBI and 20 adults without brain injuries.Methods:Participants were assessed on the Toronto Alexithymia — 20 Scale, the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and on two emotion perception tasks: matching and labelling of photos depicting the 6 basic emotions.Results:The group with TBI were impaired relative to controls when matching facial expressions. Their performance on ‘fear’ was especially poor. Performance on labelling was similar in pattern, although failed to reach significance. There was no association between poor performance on fear, or other negative expressions, and either PTSD or alexithymia symptoms in the TBI group.Conclusions:Alexithymia, as assessed by the TAS-20, taps a constellation of difficulties that do not appear to include difficulties with emotion perception in people with traumatic brain injuries.


Brain Injury ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 680-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet P. Niemeier ◽  
Jeffrey S. Kreutzer ◽  
Jennifer H. Marwitz ◽  
Kelli W. Gary ◽  
Jessica M. Ketchum

2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph B. Webster ◽  
Kathleen R. Bell ◽  
John D. Hussey ◽  
Theresa K. Natale ◽  
Sambasiva Lakshminarayan

Aphasiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Scott Barnes ◽  
Jason Bransby-Bell ◽  
Zia Gallagher-Beverley ◽  
Janine Mullay ◽  
Rebecca McNeil ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document