Sleep apnea in adults with traumatic brain injury: A preliminary investigation

2001 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph B. Webster ◽  
Kathleen R. Bell ◽  
John D. Hussey ◽  
Theresa K. Natale ◽  
Sambasiva Lakshminarayan
SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A314-A315
Author(s):  
Bridget Cotner ◽  
Risa Nakase-Richardson ◽  
Becky Gius ◽  
Lauren Fournier ◽  
Alexa Watach ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is prevalent after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may diminish recovery when left untreated. Despite the demonstrated importance of treating OSA following TBI, assessment for OSA during or soon after inpatient rehabilitation for TBI is limited. Little is known about barriers to implementing OSA screening and early diagnosis during inpatient rehabilitation thus hindering the translation of evidence-based OSA assessment procedures into clinical practice and potentially delaying necessary OSA treatment. The current analysis explored facilitators and barriers to implementing OSA screening tools in an inpatient rehabilitation setting from the perspectives of end user stakeholders. Methods Patients, families, industry, clinical providers and administrators participated in a two-day meeting following completion of a diagnostic clinical trial of OSA screening and diagnostic tools during inpatient rehabilitation. Stakeholders were provided with open ended questions generated by study investigators and given the opportunity to respond on paper or a “graffiti wall” (i.e., white board). Example questions include “What are the greatest needs of the healthcare system related to sleep apnea and TBI?” and “What are the key things we need to consider to move results into real-world practice?” Qualitative content analyses using a rapid matrix approach were conducted from stakeholder feedback obtained during the two-day meeting, which included a guided review of emerging OSA research and discussion of potential implementation barriers of OSA assessment during inpatient rehabilitation. Results Improved screening and treatment practices for OSA were the greatest needs identified. To meet these needs, stakeholders identified the importance of improving patient, family, and staff understanding of OSA (e.g., health literacy) and other sleep disorders through education; inpatient rehabilitation access to resources (technology; sleep providers); and reimbursement for additional inpatient procedures. Conclusion Although treatment of OSA is crucial for recovery during inpatient rehabilitation following TBI, barriers to earlier recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of OSA exists across several different domains, including education, resources, and funding policies. Findings support future implementation efforts to translate evidence-based care into practice to improve patient outcomes. Support (if any) PCORI-NCT03033901


Brain Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1245-1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Bivona ◽  
A. Costa ◽  
M. Contrada ◽  
D. Silvestro ◽  
E. Azicnuda ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Koole ◽  
Nickola W. Nelson ◽  
Amy B. Curtis

PurposeThis preliminary investigation examined speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') use of contextualized practices (i.e., functional, personally relevant, nonhierarchical, and collaborative) compared with traditional practices (i.e., clinical, generic, hierarchical, and expert driven) with school-age children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI).MethodsAn electronic survey asked SLPs about their use of clinical activities described as more or less contextualized. Research questions focused on frequency of using contextualized practices and factors associated with their use or nonuse.ResultsSeventy responses met criteria for analysis; 98% of these participants reported using at least 1 contextualized practice. Higher use of contextualized practices was associated with working in schools compared to health care settings, access to experts, and greater experience with TBI. Most frequently cited reasons for not using contextualized practices included not fitting the student and scheduling issues.ConclusionsFactors associated with using contextualized practices suggest that access to experts and experience with TBI are critical components for facilitating contextualized practice recommendations. Reasons for not using certain contextualized practices highlight the need to address scheduling issues and to increase education about practices that may best meet the unique needs of students with TBI.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Skye McDonald ◽  
Julia Rosenfeld ◽  
Julie D. Henry ◽  
Leanne Togher ◽  
Robyn Tate ◽  
...  

AbstractPrimary objective:Recent research studies attest to the presence of deficits in emotion perception following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Additionally, a growing number of studies report significant levels of alexithymia (disorder of emotional cognition) following TBI. This research aimed to examine the relation between the two, while assessing the influence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Design:Cross-sectional study examining levels of alexithymia, emotion perception disorders and PTSD and their association, in 20 people with severe, chronic TBI and 20 adults without brain injuries.Methods:Participants were assessed on the Toronto Alexithymia — 20 Scale, the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale and on two emotion perception tasks: matching and labelling of photos depicting the 6 basic emotions.Results:The group with TBI were impaired relative to controls when matching facial expressions. Their performance on ‘fear’ was especially poor. Performance on labelling was similar in pattern, although failed to reach significance. There was no association between poor performance on fear, or other negative expressions, and either PTSD or alexithymia symptoms in the TBI group.Conclusions:Alexithymia, as assessed by the TAS-20, taps a constellation of difficulties that do not appear to include difficulties with emotion perception in people with traumatic brain injuries.


PM&R ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 977-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaspal R. Singh ◽  
Miriam Segal ◽  
Richard Malone ◽  
Mohammed Zubair

Brain Injury ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 680-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet P. Niemeier ◽  
Jeffrey S. Kreutzer ◽  
Jennifer H. Marwitz ◽  
Kelli W. Gary ◽  
Jessica M. Ketchum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document