scholarly journals Ultrasonographic Findings After Conservative Treatment of Acute Appendicitis and Open Appendicectomy

1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-177
Author(s):  
S. Eriksson ◽  
Å. Tisell ◽  
L. Granström
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Open Appendicectomy

Ultrasonographic Findings after Conservative Treatment of Acute Appendicitis and Open Appendicectomy

1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Eriksson ◽  
Å. Tisell ◽  
L. Granström
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Open Appendicectomy ◽  
Recurrent Appendicitis ◽  
Us Findings

In a randomized study we investigated the effects of antibiotics as the only treatment in acute appendicitis. Forty patients were examined, 19 after antibiotic treatment (one operated due to perforation) and 21 after surgery. All patients were examined prior to randomization, after 10 days and after 30 days. Of the positive ultrasonographic (US) findings, 18 (86%) of the 21 operated patients had histologically proven acute appendicitis. At the 10th day, 9 patients had a seroma under the scar, which had disappeared a month after surgery in all patients. In the 19 patients conservatively treated with antibiotics, the appendix could be visualized in 8 symptom-free cases on the 10th day. In 5 of the 8 patients the appendix was still visualized after 1 month. Three of these 5 had recurrent appendicitis within a year. It is concluded that US can be used not only in diagnosing acute appendicitis, but also in the evaluation of treatments such as antibiotics.

scholarly journals 1185 Acute Paediatric Appendicitis(AA)-Decreasing The Negative Rate Of Appendicectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Karagiannidis ◽  
O Toma ◽  
E Mallidis ◽  
F Youssef
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Open Appendicectomy ◽  
Number Of Children ◽  
Negative Rate ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy

Abstract Aim The COVID -19 pandemic has forced changes in the management of Acute Appendicitis (AA), such as prioritising conservative management and avoiding laparoscopic procedures. This observational study aims to monitor and reduce the negative rate of paediatric appendicectomy and optimise the acute paediatric management following the newly introduced workflow. Method Retrospective patient data collection via electronic sources for all paediatric patients(0-16 years old) admitted with AA between March 23rd and October 31st 2020. Results During this period 74 patients were admitted with suspected AA. Conservative treatment was performed in 16 (22%) patients and operative management in 58 (78%), of which 15 (26%) had an open appendicectomy, while 43 (74%) underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy. The first trimester the negative appendicectomy rate was 25%, which dropped to 11% because of the newly introduced paediatric AA workflow and the more extensive use of US in the context of diagnosis of appendicitis.In the beginning of the study, the percentage of US scanning was 72% and was increased to 90% after the end of the 3rd period. Conclusions The introduction of the paediatric AA workflow and the more extensive use of US helped to decrease the percentage of negative rate of paediatric appendicecomy the number of children who underwent unnecessary operation.

scholarly journals APPENDICULAR MASS

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 180-184
Author(s):  
SARDAR ALI ◽  
HAFIZ MUHAMMED RAFIQUE
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Surgical Exploration ◽  
Group I ◽  
Variable Extent ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction ◽  
Appendicular Mass

Introduction: Appendicular mass is a common complication of acute appendicitis. The traditional treatment of this is conservative followed by delayed appendectomy. But now with advancement in all the fields of medicine early surgical exploration of the appendicular mass can be done with satisfactory results. Aims and objectives: A comparison of conservative treatment versus early surgical exploration of appendicular mass. Study Design: Experimental study. Material and Method: Two years study from December 2003 to November 2005 at district headquarters hospital Khanewal. Total 60 patients, both males and females between 12 to 65 years of age with symptoms and signs consistent with appendicular mass were included. They were randomly divided into group I (Early exploration) and group II (Conservative treatment) each containing 30 patients. A comparison of outcome between two groups was done statistically by applying studentChi-square test. Results: There was a peak incidence of acute appendicitis in Second and third decades of life. Male to female ratio was 2:1. More than 90% of patients had history of shifting of abdominal pain. 100% of the patients had inflamed appendix to variable extent on exploration. The complications in the form of adhesive intestinal obstruction; failure of treatment; lost follow up; misdiagnosis and re admissionwere less in group I. There was a significant less duration of hospital stay in group I as compared to Group II. The observations and outcome in this study are almost comparable and correspond with other studies done in this regard. Conclusion: Early surgical exploration of appendicular mass is safe and cost effective.

scholarly journals Surgical site infection in Laparoscopic versus Open appendicectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-43
Author(s):  
Ashok Koirala ◽  
Dipendra Thakur ◽  
Sunit Agrawal ◽  
Bhuwan Lal Chaudhary ◽  
Sagar Poudel
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Open Appendicectomy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Mean

 Background: Acute appendicitis is very common surgical cause of acute abdomen and needs surgical removal either by laparoscopic or open appendicectomy. The aim of this study is to compare frequency of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Materials and Methods: The study was prospective study conducted in NMCTH, Biratnagar. Total 200 patients with diagnosis of acute appendicitis admitted through the emergency department of our hospital were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated in two groups: Laparoscopic appendicectomy group (LA) and Open appendicectomy group (OA). Both groups underwent successful emergency appendicectomy. Wound infections in terms of surgical site infection (SSI) if present were recorded. All age groups and both sexes were included.  Results: Two hundred patients underwent appendicectomy, one hundred Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) and another hundred open appendicectomy (OA). The mean age of patients with acute appendicitis was 30.63±16.14 years with minimum of 6 years and maximum of 77 years. The highest number of patients were in age group of 10 to 20 years (29.5%). In LA group SSI noted in 3 patients (3%) whereas in OA group it was found in 12 patients (12%). Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is better and offers great advantages in terms of SSI as compared to Open appendicectomy.  

Acute appendicitis with a neuroendocrine tumor G1 (carcinoid): pitfalls of conservative treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki A. Watanabe ◽  
Taketoshi Fujimoto ◽  
Yo Kato ◽  
Mayumi Sasaki ◽  
Toshikazu Ikusue
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumor

scholarly journals 1565 In Covid-19 Pandemic, Following the Updated Royal College of Surgeons of England Guidelines in Management of Acute Appendicitis; A General District Hospital Audit

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Dorra ◽  
M Abdellatif ◽  
W Fahmy ◽  
Y Salama
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Royal College ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
District Hospital ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Operative Intervention ◽  
Coding System ◽  
Conservative Group

Abstract Aim The Aim of the study is assessment of the compliance with the updated Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) guidelines in management of acute appendicitis in a general district hospital during COVID-19 pandemic. Conservative treatment of acute appendicitis is encouraged unless unresponsiveness to treatment or complications ensues. Method Collection of retrospective data using hospital coding system was done from 63 patients medical records who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis from April 2020 to June 2020. Results The collected data analysis showed adherence to conservative treatment in 16 out of 63 (16/63) patients (25.4%). It succeeded in 10/16 patients (63 %). 6/16 patients were switched to operative intervention (37 %). There were no complications in patients who needed operative intervention after failure of conservative management. Operative management was primarily chosen in 47/63 patients (74.6 %). Re-admissions were 3/16 patients (18.75 %) in conservative group in comparison to 1/47 patient (2.12 %) in primarily operative group. Conclusions The work showed a promising rate of success of conservative treatment. However, there is a low level of compliance with RCS guidelines in management of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic. The study showed increased re-admission rate for conservative management versus primarily operative management pathways. No complications were detected in cases who needed operative intervention after failure of conservative management. Re-auditing is to follow. The study recommends national comparison of data as it might be worthwhile considering primary management of acute appendicitis.

scholarly journals A comparison of intra-operative diagnosis to histopathological diagnosis of acute appendicitis in paediatric and adult cohorts: an analysis of over 1000 patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnathon Harris ◽  
Christina A. Fleming ◽  
Paul N. Stassen ◽  
Daniel Mullen ◽  
Helen Mohan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Open Appendicectomy ◽  
Normal Appendix ◽  
Macroscopic Appearance ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Final Histological Diagnosis ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Operating Surgeon

Abstract Background Appendicitis is a common general surgical emergency. The role of removing a normal appendix is debated. However, this relies on accurate intra-operative diagnosis of a normal appendix by the operating surgeon. This study aimed to compare surgeon’s intra-operative assessment to final histological result acute appendicitis in paediatric and adult patients. Methods All patients who underwent appendicectomy over a 14-year period in a general surgical department were identified using the prospective Lothian Surgical Audit system and pathology reports retrieved to identify final histological diagnosis. Open appendicectomy was selected to examine, as the routine practise at our institution is to remove a normal appendix at open appendicectomy. Results A total of 1035 open appendicectomies were performed for clinically suspected appendicitis. Sensitivity of intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis with operating surgeon was high at 95.13% with no difference between trainee and consultant surgeon or between adult and paediatric cases. Specificity of intra-operative diagnosis was lower in the paediatric group (32.58%) than in the adult group (40.58%). Women had a higher rate of negative appendicectomy than men. Conclusion The results of this study highlight some discordance between histological evidence of acute appendicitis and intra-operative impression. Therefore other clinical variables and not just macroscopic appearance alone should be used when deciding to perform appendicectomy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document