Late adverse effects of radiation therapy for rectal cancer – a systematic overview

2007 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helgi Birgisson ◽  
Lars Påhlman ◽  
Ulf Gunnarsson ◽  
Bengt Glimelius
2006 ◽  
Vol 93 (12) ◽  
pp. 1519-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Pollack ◽  
T. Holm ◽  
B. Cedermark ◽  
D. Altman ◽  
B. Holmström ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (34) ◽  
pp. 8697-8705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helgi Birgisson ◽  
Lars Påhlman ◽  
Ulf Gunnarsson ◽  
Bengt Glimelius

Purpose To analyze the occurrence of subacute and late adverse effects in patients treated with preoperative irradiation for rectal cancer. Patients and Methods The study population included 1,147 patients randomly assigned to preoperative radiation therapy or surgery alone in the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial conducted 1987 through 1990. Patient data were matched against the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register to identify patients admitted to hospital after the primary treatment of the rectal cancer. Patients with known residual disease were excluded, and patients with a recurrence were censored 3 months before the date of recurrence. Relative risks (RR) with 95% CIs were calculated. Results Irradiated patients were at increased risk of admissions during the first 6 months from the primary treatment (RR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.22); these were mainly for gastrointestinal diagnoses. Overall, the two groups showed no difference in the risk of admissions more than 6 months from the primary treatment (RR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.12). Regarding specific diagnoses, however, RRs were increased for admissions later than 6 months from the primary treatment in irradiated patients for unspecified infections, bowel obstruction, abdominal pain, and nausea. Conclusion Gastrointestinal disorders, resulting in hospital admissions, seem to be the most common adverse effect of short-course preoperative radiation therapy in patients with rectal cancer. Bowel obstruction was the diagnosis of potentially greatest importance, which was more frequent in irradiated than in nonirradiated patients.


2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 476-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Henrik Grönberg ◽  
Johannes Järhult ◽  
Arne Wallgren ◽  
Eva Cavallin-ståhl

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 165-168
Author(s):  
Yutaka Naoi ◽  
Kana Yamada ◽  
Chie Kurokawa ◽  
Hiroaki Kunogi ◽  
Yoshiro Sakamoto ◽  
...  

AbstractAimLate adverse effects following radiation therapy for prostate cancer involve the urinary and lower gastrointestinal tracts, with continuous rectal bleeding being the most serious issue. We focused on late adverse effects, particularly rectal bleeding after volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.Materials and MethodsSeventy-three patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with radiation therapy using VMAT with an image-guided radiation therapy system. Patient age at the start of irradiation ranged from 54 to 81 years (median, 71 years). The follow-up period ranged from 23 to 87 months (median, 57 months). The prescribed total irradiation dose was 76 Gy in 38 fractions.ResultsLate rectal bleeding was observed in 14 (19%) patients, with nine (12.3%), four (5.5%), and one (1.4%) being classified as grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively. One grade 3 patient with rectal bleeding had severe diabetes and was administered intravenous warfarin for cardiomyopathy.FindingsVMAT may provide better accuracy and involve fewer time constraints for patients compared with other intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) methods. The incidence of late rectal bleeding in VMAT is almost equivalent to that of other IMRT methods.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 170-175
Author(s):  
Jordan Leatherman ◽  
Christina Nicholas ◽  
Therese Cusick ◽  
Ellen Cooke ◽  
Elizabeth Ablah ◽  
...  

Introduction. This project sought to compare patient-reported outcomes between patients who received intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT) and those who qualified for IORT but received whole-breast external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods. Three scales from the BREAST-Q Breast Cancer BCT Module Version 2.0 questionnaire were used to collect patient-reported outcomes regarding post-operative physical well-being of the chest, post-operative satisfaction with breast cosmesis and post-operative adverse effects of radiation. Results. Patients who received EBRT travelled farther on average than patients who received IORT to complete treatment. Respondents who received IORT reported better physical well-being of the chest than those who received EBRT. Regression reveals that the respondent’s age was the determining factor in the difference between IORT and EBRT post-operative physical well-being scores, where younger patients report poorer well-being. There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes regarding post-operative satisfaction with breast cosmesis or adverse effects of radiation. Conclusions. This study suggests that patients who received IORT report better physical well-being of the chest than patients who received EBRT. There appears to be a relationship between age and physical well-being of chest. This study suggests that there is no difference in patient-reported outcomes concerning post-operative satisfaction with breast cosmesis or post-operative adverse effects of radiation between patients who received IORT and those who received EBRT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document