Leadership, cooperating teachers, and successful student teaching

1975 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Ray Heitzmann ◽  
Charles Staropoli
2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-468
Author(s):  
Philip B. Edelman

The purpose of this study was to determine the perceptions of cooperating teachers regarding the importance of certain teacher traits, behaviors, and skills as predictors of a successful student teaching experience. The sample consisted of teachers who had served as cooperating teachers ( N = 519). Participants rated a list of 40 teacher traits, behaviors, and skills based on their (perceived) importance as predictors of student teacher success. I constructed ranked lists for each demographic grouping of respondents by the mean score for each item, and these lists were examined using a method put forward by Teachout. Results revealed that the highest-rated items regardless of demographic grouping variables were demonstrating appropriate social behavior, stress management, fostering appropriate student behavior, establishing a positive rapport with others, and enthusiasm. All participant groups rated personal traits, behaviors, and skills as most important; followed by teaching traits, behaviors, and skills; then musical traits, behaviors, and skills. Content analyses of open-ended questions revealed that no items had a universal meaning among participants in this study.


1975 ◽  
Vol 157 (4) ◽  
pp. 40-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
William W. Wilen ◽  
Richard D. Hawthorne

Three years ago Kent State began making the transition from a traditional student teaching program to the Teacher Education Center approach. The major purpose was to bring together school and university people in a parity relationship to jointly plan, implement and evaluate the field-based components of professional training programs. As Kent State moved into the center approach, the responsibilities of student teaching supervisors began to change significantly. This prompted a redefinition of the role and title change to clinical professor. Last year the analysis of the data received from a comprehensive formative evaluation effort of our TEC program was completed. A major component of the assessment was the in-depth examination of the clinical professorship as perceived by TEC administrators, cooperating teachers, associate teachers and clinical professors. The data, analyses, and implications are reported in this manuscript. A major overall implication of the findings is that the clinical professor is the critical linkage between school and university in teacher preparation.


2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy L. Bell ◽  
Nathalie G. Robinson

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1086291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Zülküf Altan ◽  
Hasan Sağlamel ◽  
Mark Boylan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document