Conceptual links between Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education and Motivational Style: a critique of Adey and Shayer

1996 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Leo ◽  
David Galloway
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-534
Author(s):  
Muhamad Hugerat ◽  
Naim Najami ◽  
Mahmood Abbasi ◽  
Iyad Dkeidek

Many primary school pupils find it difficult to apply inquiry skills in general and variable control in particular, and fail to appreciate the importance of control groups in scientific research. The present study focused on levels of thinking among sixth-graders in the course of an open-ended inquiry activity, by following the planning and execution of an experiment, isolation and variable control, and the difficulties encountered by students in the implementation of various inquiry skills. The study population consisted of forty-four sixth-graders from a primary school in the Arab sector in Israel's Northern District. The students were divided into two groups, one that underwent a process of intervention in teaching in the form of three lessons using the CASE approach, while the other learned with the New Outlook textbook. The study's results point to a significant difference between the CASE intervention group and the New Outlook intervention group with respect to the final grade of the "variable identification and connection test". An examination of the differences in student achievement between the pre- and post-test reveals an improvement in the post-test final scores among the CASE group of students, in comparison to the New Outlook group. Key words: CASE, cognitive acceleration, curriculum, inquiry skills, science education.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandra Adi Prabowo ◽  
Wahyu Widodo

As an intervention program developed to accelerate participant cognitive development, the effect of Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education (CASE) implementation in certain conditions needs to be clarified. This paper describes the effect of CASE program on the cognitive development of elementary students in Indonesia. The study used a mixed method sequential explanatory design with the quantitative data collection in the first phase by Scientific Reasoning Skill Tasks administered to all of the participants both before and after intervention followed by collection of qualitative data in the second phase included interviews with the participants from both CASE and control groups. Participants of the study were 70 elementary school students (aged 10-12). After three months of intervention, students of CASE group showed higher mean gain (RGS mean= 4.4) compared to those of control group (mean RGS = 0.1). The qualitative data indicated that the CASE program also enhanced students’ motivation. Moreover, teachers who involved in the Teachers’ Professional Development (PD) Training Program developed a more specific strategy to enhance student’ cognitive ability. In other words, the CASE program was a worthwhile intervention for elementary level students in Indonesian school.


1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 568-570
Author(s):  
Richard E. Mayer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document