Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain without upper extremity symptoms

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 1328-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian A. Young ◽  
James Dunning ◽  
Raymond Butts ◽  
Firas Mourad ◽  
Joshua A. Cleland
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Numeric Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Upper Extremity Symptoms

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Progressive Resisted Exercise along with Conventional Exercise and Conventional Exercise Program alone in Subjects with Text Neck Syndrome

2021 ◽  
pp. 536-542
Author(s):  
Divya Jain ◽  
Swapna Jawade ◽  
Neha Chitale
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Numerical Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

Background: "Text neck" is a term coined to describe the posture created by leaning forward for lengthy periods of time, such as when reading and texting on a cellphone which has been linked to stress injuries. Neck pain, upper back discomfort, shoulder pain, frequent headaches, and greater curvature of the spine are all dangerous indications of text neck. According to a survey, 35% of smartphone users suffer from text neck syndrome. People between the ages of 15 and 18 are more likely to have neck pain. This protocol has been created that describes the design of comparative study to evaluate effectiveness of progressive resisted exercise along with conventional exercise and conventional exercise program alone in text neck syndrome. Methods: The participants (n=80) will be recruited in the study suffering from text neck syndrome and meeting the inclusion criteria. Two groups will be formed such that patients in group A will be treated with conventional therapy and group B will be treated with progressive resisted exercise (PRE) along with conventional therapy. The protocol will cover 4 weeks of treatment. In the rehabilitation period, we will evaluate the pain intensity, strength of neck muscles and functional activity. Our outcome measures will be- Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and Neck disability index (NDI). Discussion: Efficacy of the intervention will be evaluated by analyzing the pain intensity by using Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and level of functional disability by using Neck disability index (NDI). The result of the study will significantly provide affirmation on either using combination therapy of PRE with conventional exercise or conventional exercise alone.

scholarly journals Comparison of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides and Maitland Manual Therapy in Non-Specific Neck Pain on Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Neck Disability Index

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-462
Author(s):  
Fahad Tanveer ◽  
Adnan Afzal ◽  
Muhammad Adeel ◽  
Sana Shahid ◽  
Maham Masood
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Numeric Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Group 1

Incidence of neck pain is increasing day by day due to changed, sedentary, non-ergonomic environment and life style. This becomes the reason of an increased load of human resource and cost. To shed this load of resources and cost, it’s essential to sort out means which give real relief to this increasinglysignificant problem. To compare outcomes of sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) versus Maitland manual therapy in improving non-specific neck pain. It was a quasi-experimental study design. The study was conducted in Chaudhary Muhammad Akram, Teaching & Research Hospital, Lahore and SuriyaAzeem Teaching Hospital, Lahore within six months from June 2015 to December 2015. A total of 75 subjects with non-specific neck pain using non-probability convenience sampling technique who fulfilled the specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly allocated to three groups; group 1 received SNAGs,group 2 Maitland mobilization and group 3 conventional treatment. Baseline, post-intervention and follow up readings were taken through numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) for pain intensity, neck disability index (NDI) for functional status,goniometer for range of motion and manual muscle testing for muscle strengthof neck. The subject in each group were given twelve sessions, with three sessions a week. Data were analyzed through statistical package of social sciences (SPSS) 21. The results of each group showed pre-treatment pain intensity for group 1 was 7.04+1.338 that changed to 3.52+0.714 and for group 2 it was changed from 7.52+0.872 to 5.16+0.850 and 7.16+0.943 to 5.12+0.781 for group 3. The NDI score for group 1, 2 and 3 were 31.56+5.560, 25.040+7.086 and 25.560+5.477 that were changed to 13.120+2.759, 16.360+2.899 and 12.600+2.020 respectively. The one way ANOVA test compared mean of three groups and p-value for painintensity after treatment was p=0.000 and for functional status p=0.000. The study showed that SNAGs mobilization was more effective in the management of non-specific neck pain and also conventional treatment improved functional status of neck than Maitland mobilization.

scholarly journals Διερεύνηση της αποτελεσματικότητας των ασκήσεων κινητοποίησης του περιφερικού νευρικού ιστού σε συνδυασμό με αυχενική έλξη σε ασθενείς με αυχενική ριζοπάθεια

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Χρήστος Σάββα
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Functional Scale ◽  
Numeric Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

Στόχος της διδακτορικής διατριβής ήταν να διερευνήσει την αποτελεσματικότητα της αυχενικής έλξης σε συνδυασμό με την εφαρμογή των ασκήσεων κινητοποίησης του περιφερικού νευρικού ιστού στην αντιμετώπιση της αυχενικής ριζοπάθειας. Πιλοτικά η διερεύνηση του συγκεκριμένου θεραπευτικού πλάνου πραγματοποιήθηκε με μια περιπτωσιακή μελέτη ενώ αργότερα πραγματοποιήθηκε μια διπλά τυφλή τυχαιοποιημένη ελεγχόμενη δοκιμασία (συμμετοχή σαράντα δύο ασθενών που ισομερώς κατανεμήθηκαν στις ομάδες ελέγχου και θεραπείας) με σαφώς καλύτερο μεθοδολογικό σχεδιασμό σε σχέση με την προηγούμενη μελέτη. Για την αξιολόγηση του συγκεκριμένου θεραπευτικού πλάνου χρησιμοποιήθηκαν τα όργανα αξιολόγησης the Neck Disability Index, the Patient-Specific Functional Scale and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Επιπρόσθετα, αξιολογήθηκε η δύναμη της λαβής της άκρας χειρός αλλά και το εύρος κίνησης της αυχενικής μοίρας της σπονδυλικής στήλης. Σύμφωνα με τα ευρήματα της διατριβής αποδείχτηκε πως η εφαρμογή της αυχενικής έλξης και των ασκήσεων κινητοποίησης του περιφερικού νευρικού ιστού μπορεί να αντιμετωπίσουν τον νευρογενή πόνο αλλά και να αναβαθμίσουν το επίπεδο λειτουργικότητας των ασθενών με αυχενική ριζοπάθεια. Περισσότερες μελλοντικές ερευνητικές εργασίας θα πρέπει να διεξαχθούν έτσι ώστε να διερευνηθεί η μακροπρόθεσμη αποτελεσματικότητα του συγκεκριμένου θεραπευτικού πλάνου αλλά και να συγκριθεί η δράση του σε σχέση με την αποτελεσματικότητα άλλων θεραπευτικών εργαλείων όπως είναι ο θεραπευτικός υπέρηχος κτλ.

Psychometric properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Neck Disability Index in patients with cervicogenic headache

Cephalalgia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian A Young ◽  
James Dunning ◽  
Raymond Butts ◽  
Joshua A Cleland ◽  
César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Point Reduction ◽  
Cervicogenic Headaches ◽  
Numeric Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

Background Self-reported disability and pain intensity are commonly used outcomes in patients with cervicogenic headaches. However, there is a paucity of psychometric evidence to support the use of these self-report outcomes for individuals treated with cervicogenic headaches. Therefore, it is unknown if these measures are reliable, responsive, or result in meaningful clinically important changes in this patient population. Methods A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (n = 110) examining the effects of spinal manipulative therapy with and without exercise in patients with cervicogenic headaches. Reliability, construct validity, responsiveness and thresholds for minimal detectable change and clinically important difference values were calculated for the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Results The Neck Disability Index exhibited excellent reliability (ICC = 0.92; [95 % CI: 0.46–0.97]), while the Numeric Pain Rating Scale exhibited moderate reliability (ICC = 0.72; [95 % CI: 0.08–0.90]) in the short term. Both instruments also exhibited adequate responsiveness (area under the curve; range = 0.78–0.93) and construct validity ( p < 0.001) in this headache population. Conclusions Both instruments seem well suited as short-term self-report measures for patients with cervicogenic headaches. Clinicians and researchers should expect at least a 2.5-point reduction on the numeric pain rating scale and a 5.5-point reduction on the neck disability index after 4 weeks of intervention to be considered clinically meaningful.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS OF CERVICAL MANUAL MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES VERSUS STRETCHING EXERCISES FOR PAIN RELIEF IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NECK PAIN

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-264
Author(s):  
Nida Waheed ◽  
Muhammad Amir ◽  
Rabia Noureen ◽  
Sumaira Nawaz ◽  
Raza Zaidi Syeda Wajeeha
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Pain Disability Index ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Strengthening Exercises ◽  
History Of ◽  
Numeric Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Stretching Exercises

Introduction. A huge literature is available regarding the efficacy of various physiotherapy techniques for neck pain (NP), however, comparative study is still in scarcity. Therefore, this study aimed to compare effectiveness of stretching exercises versus manual mobilization techniques in the management of NP. Material and method. A randomized controlled trial parallel-group design study was conducted on the patients suffering from NP. Participants with the history of NP, aged between 19 to 60 years, NP without radiculopathy, and no history of trauma were included in the study. Two outcome measures were used i.e., Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and neck pain disability index (NDI) questionnaire. Two groups were equally divided had twenty-five patients each. Group A received cervical stretching with strengthening exercises as home-treatment program and group B received manual mobilization with strengthening exercises as home-treatment program. Six sessions were given on alternate basis and assessed pre- and post-treatment information of all patients. Results and discussions. Independent sample t-test was run to compare the post difference between stretching exercises and manual mobilization at 95% confidence interval (p<0.05). The Post NPRS difference between the groups shows no significant improvement (p=0.32). Similarly no significant difference was found in post NDI Disability (p=0.57). Therefore, both the treatment strategies are equally effective in improving NP and disability. Conclusions. This clinical trial concluded that stretching or manual mobilization is equally effective to reduce pain and disability. Hence, improve the quality of life in neck pain survivors. Keywords: Manual Mobilization Technique, Neck Pain, , Neck Pain Disability Index Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Range of Motion, Stretching Exercises,

scholarly journals USING NECK DISABILITY INDEX, NUMERICAL PAIN RATING SCALE AND COMPUTERIZED DYNAMIC POSTUROGRAPHY TO ASSESS CORTICAL INTEGRATIVE THERAPY IN PRACTICE BASED CLINICAL RESEARCH

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-31
Author(s):  
Victor M. Pedro ◽  
◽  
Richard L. Lyon ◽  
Elena Oggero ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Dynamic Posturography ◽  
Integrative Therapy ◽  
Numerical Pain Rating Scale ◽  
Computerized Dynamic Posturography ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

In this retrospective study of adult patient’s charts from an outpatient clinical practice, three tools, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP), were investigated to evaluate how they are affected by demographics, anthropometry and clinical status, and if they are can detect the effects of Cortical Integrative Therapy (PedroCIT®) received by these patients all affected by neck pain. The results show that they are robust metrics not affected by sex, age, payee’s type, treatment duration, or comorbidities number. CDP is affected by the primary diagnosis (traumatic brain injury/concussion, vertigo/dizziness, migraine/headaches, or other), NDI and NPRS are not. Whereas NDI and NPRS could be used interchangeably as an overall measure of the pain the patient is experiencing, their results do not correlate in general with CDP, indicating the need to use both a subjective (NDI or NPRS) and an objective tool (CDP) as they capture different aspects: how the subject rates its ability to perform daily activities and how much pain it feels, and how the postural control system maintains balance. When considering the time constraint physicians often face when dealing with patients, this chart review points toward the possibility of using the simple NPRS as subjective measure of pain, and only one instead of several CDP tests to determine the pre-post effect of a therapy. Future studies evaluating PedroCIT® outcomes for specific diagnoses in larger populations, multiple location settings, and observation for longitudinal cohesion are needed before these metrics can be fully endorsed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document