Do high-tech stock prices revert to their ‘fundamental’ value?

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 461-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Becchetti ◽  
Fabrizio Adriani
2001 ◽  
Vol -1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Leonardo Becchetti ◽  
Fabrizio Adriani

2005 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 235-250
Author(s):  
Chiung-Ju Liang ◽  
Ming-Li Yao ◽  
Jung-Chu Lin

In recent years, the formation of strategic alliances has become an increasingly common trend among developing countries around the world. In spite of this, the numerous attempts to comprehensively review the research on the correlation between these strategic alliances and stock prices over the years have, by and large, limited their discussion to how the stock price of a corporation responds to its announcement that it is forming a strategic alliance. Only a few studies have, however, discussed the announcement's indirect impact on the stock prices of investing companies that have entered into such strategic alliances. It is for this reason that we conduct an event study and develop an empirical model to measure that indirect impact on the stock prices of investing companies engaging in strategic alliances with Taiwan's high-tech industry from 1998 to 2002, while also discussing the market's different responses in their stock prices according to various industrial types that have been used to classify these investing companies.


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (16) ◽  
pp. 1343-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Chung Guo ◽  
Hsiu-Ting Shih

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 226
Author(s):  
Dzung Viet Nguyen

This study is related to the issue of whether the stock market reflects the fundamental value of high-tech firms around the 2000 high-tech bubble. We extend the literature on firm valuation by exploiting the conceptual difference between intrinsic and relative values. We apply the residual income model and valuation multiples to estimate these two values respectively and make a comparison for a sample of biotechnology firms. Under realistic assumptions, it seems that estimated fundamental values of these firms fail to be reflected by the stock market. Their market valuation is rather based on relative value for both periods before and after the fall of high-tech stocks.


2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Lamdin

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella N. Spilioti

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use the Barberis et al. (1998)’s valuation model to calculate the fundamental value of a stock and examine whether the differences between predicted and realized stock prices are explained both by psychological factors (that affect investor reaction to information) and by key macroeconomic variables. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a time-series analysis, as well as a panel data approach, to examine whether the price deviations from fundamental values are because of macroeconomic and psychological factors, using data from the London Stock Exchange. Findings The results indicate that these differences are explained by important macroeconomic variables, as well as by the sentiment of investors (that is used as a proxy of the psychological factors). Originality/value Based on the above results, this paper suggests that the price deviations from fundamental values are not treated as model estimation errors as proposed by Penman and Sougiannis (1998) but rather as deviations that are because of psychological factors, as well as to macroeconomic conditions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Li ◽  
Jiahui Li ◽  
Jinjian Yuan

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to empirically analyze the impacts of short prohibitions on stock prices. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt event study in this paper. First, the authors match each shortable stocks with one unshortable stocks by the propensity score matching method. Second, the authors check the performance difference between treatment group and control group after the event date. Third, the authors check the performance difference among sub-groups sorted by other factors associated with stock returns. Findings The authors find that stocks do not decline necessarily after removal of short prohibitions; only those heavily overpriced stocks, such as small stocks, lower B/M or P/E stocks and higher turnover stocks, decline significantly. Research limitations/implications The media falsely stated that short selling lead to market crash; otherwise, short selling is beneficial for improving market efficiency as it is helpful for keeping overpriced stocks in line with the fundamental value. Originality/value This is the first paper showing that removal of short prohibitions only impacts heavily overpriced stocks significantly, which is valuable for policy making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document