scholarly journals Motivation for a Health-Literate Health Care System—Does Socioeconomic Status Play a Substantial Role? Implications for an Irish Health Policymaker

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 158-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diarmuid Coughlan ◽  
Brian Turner ◽  
Antonio Trujillo
2018 ◽  
Vol 160 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Khalil ◽  
Martin J. Corsten ◽  
Margaret Holland ◽  
Adele Balram ◽  
James Ted McDonald ◽  
...  

Objective Diagnosis of laryngeal cancer is dependent on awareness that persistent hoarseness needs to be investigated as well as access to an otolaryngologist. This study aimed to better classify and understand 3 factors that may lead to variability in stage at presentation of laryngeal cancer: (1) socioeconomic status (SES), (2) differences in access to health care by location of residence (rural vs urban or by province), and (3) access to an otolaryngologist (by otolaryngologists per capita). Study Design Registry-based multicenter cohort analysis. Setting This was a national study across Canada, a country with a single-payer, universal health care system. Subjects All persons 18 years or older who were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer from 2005 to 2013 inclusive were extracted from the Canadian Cancer Registry (CCR). Methods Ordered logistic regression was used to determine the effect of income, age, sex, province of residence, and rural vs urban residence on stage at presentation. Results A total of 1550 cases were included (1280 males and 265 females). The stage at presentation was earlier in the highest income quintile (quintile 5) compared to the lower income quintiles (quintiles 1-4) (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; P < .05). There was a statistically significant difference in stage at presentation based on rural or urban residence within the highest income quintile (OR, 1.73; P < .005). Conclusion There is a relationship between SES and stage at presentation for laryngeal cancer even in the Canadian universal health care system.


2014 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 156-157
Author(s):  
B.J. Long ◽  
J. Chang ◽  
A. Ziogas ◽  
K.S. Tewari ◽  
H. Anton-Culver ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 212 (4) ◽  
pp. 468.e1-468.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverly Long ◽  
Jenny Chang ◽  
Argyrios Ziogas ◽  
Krishnansu S. Tewari ◽  
Hoda Anton-Culver ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 1016-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J Tarman ◽  
Christopher J Kane ◽  
Judd W Moul ◽  
J.Brantley Thrasher ◽  
John P Foley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 070674372110048
Author(s):  
Claire de Oliveira ◽  
Luke Mondor ◽  
Walter P. Wodchis ◽  
Laura C. Rosella

Introduction: Previous research has shown that the socioeconomic status (SES)–health gradient also extends to high-cost patients; however, little work has examined high-cost patients with mental illness and/or addiction. The objective of this study was to examine associations between individual-, household- and area-level SES factors and future high-cost use among these patients. Methods: We linked survey data from adult participants (ages 18 and older) of 3 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey to administrative health care data from Ontario, Canada. Respondents with mental illness and/or addiction were identified based on prior mental health and addiction health care use and followed for 5 years for which we ascertained health care costs covered under the public health care system. We quantified associations between SES factors and becoming a high-cost patient (i.e., transitioning into the top 5%) using logistic regression models. For ordinal SES factors, such as income, education and marginalization variables, we measured absolute and relative inequalities using the slope and relative index of inequality. Results: Among our sample, lower personal income (odds ratio [ OR] = 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54 to 2.88, for CAD$0 to CAD$14,999), lower household income ( OR = 2.11, 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.99, for lowest income quintile), food insecurity ( OR = 1.87, 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.55) and non-homeownership ( OR = 1.34, 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.66), at the individual and household levels, respectively, and higher residential instability (OR = 1.72, 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.42, for most marginalized), at the area level, were associated with higher odds of becoming a high-cost patient within a 5-year period. Moreover, the inequality analysis suggested pro-high-SES gradients in high-cost transitions. Conclusions: Policies aimed at high-cost patients with mental illness and/or addiction, or those concerned with preventing individuals with these conditions from becoming high-cost patients in the health care system, should also consider non-clinical factors such as income as well as related dimensions including food security and homeownership.


2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Demeter ◽  
W. D. Leslie ◽  
L. Lix ◽  
L. MacWilliam ◽  
G. S. Finlayson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth K. Darling ◽  
Lindsay Grenier ◽  
Lisa Nussey ◽  
Beth Murray-Davis ◽  
Eileen K. Hutton ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Despite public funding of midwifery care, people of low-socioeconomic status are less likely to access midwifery care in Ontario, Canada, but little is known about barriers that they experience in accessing midwifery care. The purpose of this study was to examine the barriers and facilitators to accessing midwifery care experienced by people of low-socioeconomic status. Methods A qualitative descriptive study design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 pregnant and post-partum people of low-socioeconomic status in Hamilton, Ontario from January to May 2018. Transcribed interviews were coded using open coding techniques and thematically analyzed. Results We interviewed 13 midwifery care recipients and 17 participants who had never received care from midwives. Four themes arose from the interviews: “I had no idea…”, “Babies are born in hospitals”, “Physicians as gateways into prenatal care”, and “Why change a good thing?”. Participants who had not experienced midwifery care had minimal knowledge of midwifery and often had misconceptions about midwives’ scope of practice and education. Prevailing beliefs about pregnancy and birth, particularly concerns about safety, drove participants to seek care from a physician. Physicians are the entry point into the health care system for many, yet few participants received information about midwifery care from physicians. Participants who had experienced midwifery care found it to be an appropriate match for the needs of people of low socioeconomic status. Word of mouth was a primary source of information about midwifery and the most common reason for people unfamiliar with midwifery to seek midwifery care. Conclusions Access to midwifery care is constrained for people of low-socioeconomic status because lack of awareness about midwifery limits the approachability of these services, and because information about midwifery care is often not provided by physicians when pregnant people first contact the health care system. For people of low-socioeconomic status, inequitable access to midwifery care may be exacerbated by lack of knowledge about midwifery within social networks and a tendency to move passively through the health care system which traditionally favours physician care. Targeted efforts to address this issue are necessary to reduce disparities in access to midwifery care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document