Toward an Economic Analysis of the Environmental Burden of Disease Among Canadian Children

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Bérubé
2014 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto Hänninen ◽  
Anne B. Knol ◽  
Matti Jantunen ◽  
Tek-Ang Lim ◽  
André Conrad ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David Rojas-Rueda ◽  
Martine Vrijheid ◽  
Oliver Robinson ◽  
Aasvang Gunn Marit ◽  
Regina Gražulevičienė ◽  
...  

Background: Environmental factors determine children’s health. Quantifying the health impacts related to environmental hazards for children is essential to prioritize interventions to improve health in Europe. Objective: This study aimed to assess the burden of childhood disease due to environmental risks across the European Union. Methods: We conducted an environmental burden of childhood disease assessment in the 28 countries of the EU (EU28) for seven environmental risk factors (particulate matter less than 10 micrometer of diameter (PM10) and less than 2.5 micrometer of diameter (PM2.5), ozone, secondhand smoke, dampness, lead, and formaldehyde). The primary outcome was disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), assessed from exposure data provided by the World Health Organization, Global Burden of Disease project, scientific literature, and epidemiological risk estimates. Results: The seven studied environmental risk factors for children in the EU28 were responsible for around 211,000 DALYs annually. Particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) was the main environmental risk factor, producing 59% of total DALYs (125,000 DALYs), followed by secondhand smoke with 20% of all DALYs (42,500 DALYs), ozone 11% (24,000 DALYs), dampness 6% (13,000 DALYs), lead 3% (6200 DALYs), and formaldehyde 0.2% (423 DALYs). Conclusions: Environmental exposures included in this study were estimated to produce 211,000 DALYs each year in children in the EU28, representing 2.6% of all DALYs in children. Among the included environmental risk factors, air pollution (particulate matter and ozone) was estimated to produce the highest burden of disease in children in Europe, half of which was due to the effects of PM10 on infant mortality. Effective policies to reduce environmental pollutants across Europe are needed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Greco ◽  
Jinhee Kim ◽  
Chris Drudge ◽  
Stephanie Young ◽  
Elaina MacIntyre ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (02) ◽  
pp. 154-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Tobollik ◽  
Dietrich Plaß ◽  
Nadine Steckling ◽  
Hajo Zeeb ◽  
Dirk Wintermeyer ◽  
...  

Zusammenfassung Ziel der Studie Umweltrisikofaktoren haben häufig eine hohe gesundheitliche Relevanz mit einem großen und z. T. nicht ausreichend genutzten Präventionspotenzial. Das Wissen über die komplexen Wirkungszusammenhänge zwischen Umwelt und Gesundheit ist für einige Umweltrisikofaktoren begrenzt. Ein Instrument, das bestehende Evidenz nutzt, um die gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen für eine Bevölkerung oder Bevölkerungsgruppe zu quantifizieren, ist das Konzept der umweltbedingten Krankheitslast (Environmental Burden of Disease, EBD). Ziel des Beitrages ist es, das Konzept der umweltbedingten Krankheitslast vorzustellen sowie den Nutzen aber auch die Kritikpunkte zu benennen. Methodik EBD fasst Morbiditäts- und Mortalitätsdaten in einem Summenmaß, dem Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY), zusammen und ermöglicht eine vergleichende Darstellung von Krankheitslasten. Hierfür werden Lebensjahre als Einheit genutzt. Mithilfe des attributablen Anteils kann ermittelt werden, welcher Anteil der Gesamtkrankheitslast auf umweltbedingte Risikofaktoren zurückzuführen ist. Ergebnisse Das EBD-Konzept wird, trotz seiner zunehmenden Anwendung im internationalen Raum, häufig kritisch diskutiert, da die Einschränkung des mehrdimensionalen Konstrukts Gesundheit in einer Maßzahl zusammengefasst wird. Weitere Kritik bezieht sich auf die sozialen und normativen Konventionen, die das Konzept beinhaltet. Fehlende oder unzureichende Eingangsdaten können zudem die Qualität und Aussagekraft von EBD-Schätzungen limitieren. Schlussfolgerung Es bedarf eines wissenschaftlichen Diskurses, in welchem Rahmen das Konzept in Deutschland genutzt werden kann und sollte.


Epidemiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (Suppl) ◽  
pp. S499
Author(s):  
E OʼConnell ◽  
A Staines ◽  
J Fry

Author(s):  
Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson ◽  
Angela S. Brammer ◽  
Christopher A. Davidson ◽  
Tiina Folley ◽  
Frederic J. P. Launay ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4749-4749
Author(s):  
Nic Brereton ◽  
Lars Nicklasson ◽  
Ghulam J. Mufti

Abstract Abstract 4749 BACKGROUND: Previous UK studies into the burden of disease (BoD) of intermediate-2 (INT-2) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have focused on the potential budget impact of azacitidine. No estimates have been published for the UK that incorporate the costs associated with basic disease management in the UK for this group of patients. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the annual burden of MDS in the UK. METHODS: The research comprised a systematic review of studies in haematological cancer, and a subsequent economic analysis. The systematic review extracted all relevant BoD information from identified papers, including not only patient or healthcare elements, but also the burden on carers and family. The economic analysis combined all available, relevant evidence into annual, UK-specific cost estimates. RESULTS: The systematic literature review identified and extracted information from 23 papers. Study designs were comprised of economic evaluations (n=6), observational studies (n=2), RCTs (n=2), retrospective analyses involving registries or hospital data (n=6), review articles (n=3) and surveys (n=4). The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence appraisal of azacitidine was also included as was information from the pivotal trial of azacitidine, AZA-001. Across the literature reviewed, three main types of standard care were identified: supportive care (SC) alone, low-dose chemotherapy (LDC) and, more rarely, standard dose chemotherapy (SDC). Many papers provided estimates of transfusion burden, which had the largest BoD impact in patients who were considered transfusion dependent. Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents was identified as an additional important resource, and the societal burden of haematological cancer was also quantified in one study, which examined time required of carers and family for transfusion visits. The most recent UK epidemiological estimates were used to convert average per-patient BoD figures to national estimates. Each type of standard care had a different associated burden of blood transfusions; therefore, the subsequent economic analysis weighted the estimated BoD according to the proportion of patients expected to be eligible for BSC, LDC and SDC. It is expected that 761 INT-2 and high-risk MDS patients will be treated each year. Among these, it was estimated that a total 5,121 blood transfusions would be required per year. These transfusions are expected to be associated with a total UK annual cost of approximately £1.4 million to the NHS, as well as £17,955 to carers and family members based on expected time off work to attend transfusion sessions with the patient. Values ranging between £10 million and £14 million per year were estimated for the likely national BoD on hospitals for inpatient stays, and the national cost of NHS community nurse visits was estimated to be £115,877 per year. The societal cost of inpatient stays was also experimentally calculated based on hospitalisation statistics from the AZA-001 trial; this produced an estimated annual burden of £312,010 for the UK. CONCLUSION: The annual burden of disease associated with MDS in the UK is estimated at between £12 million and £16 million. Major components of this burden include hospitalisation and transfusion costs. Indirect costs associated with MDS such as productivity costs for patients and carers appear relatively modest but are nonetheless an important consideration and should not be overlooked. Disclosures: Brereton: Celgene Ltd: Consultancy. Nicklasson:Celgene Ltd: Employment. Mufti:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document