Do board characteristics affect corporate performance? Firm-level evidence for India

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 435-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saibal Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Board Characteristics

Board Characteristics And Corporate Performance:, Evidence From Palestine

2020 ◽  
pp. 745
Author(s):  
إسلام عبدالجواد ◽  
رشا المصرى
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Board Characteristics

Effects of board characteristics, audit committee and risk management on corporate performance: evidence from Palestinian listed companies

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-706
Author(s):  
Sami R.M. Musallam
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Chief Executive ◽  
Least Square Method ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Board Characteristics

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effects of board characteristics, audit committee and risk management on corporate performance. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 31 Palestinian non-financial listed companies from 2010 to 2016, this study uses a generalized least square method. Findings The results show that the effects of board ownership, board independence, audit committee meeting, audit committee size, audit committee financial expertise and risk management are positive and significant on corporate performance while the effects of chief executive officer duality and audit committee size are negative and significant on corporate performance. Practical implications The results of this paper are important to policymakers, shareholders and directors of companies to make appropriate choices about the board, audit committee characteristics and risk management to protect the interest of different stakeholders, increase the flow of capital and foreign investment into non-financial companies. Social implications This paper fills a gap in the corporate governance literature by investigating the effects of board characteristics, audit committee and risk management on corporate performance in Palestine as one of the youngest stock exchanges in a region that assists in testing the validity of agency theory in a young and small emerging market context. Originality/value This paper is the first to investigate the effects of board characteristics, audit committee and risk management collectively on corporate performance in Palestine as prior research on these topics has been investigated separately.

Effect of board characteristics on firm value: evidence from India

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Kumar Mishra ◽  
Sheeba Kapil
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Significant Positive Association ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Board Characteristics

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship of board characteristics and firm performance for Indian companies. Design/methodology/approach Corporate governance structures of 391 Indian companies out of CNX 500 companies listed on National Stock Exchange have been studied for their impact on performance of companies. Structural equation modeling methodology has been employed on data for five financial years from 2010 to 2014 for selected companies. Market-based measure (Tobin’s Q) and accounting-based measure (return on asset) have been employed for measuring firm performance. Findings Empirical findings indicate that there is significant positive association between board size and firm performance. Board independence is found significantly related to firm performance. Number of board meetings is found to be sending positive signal to the market creating firm value. Separation of CEO and chairman of the board is found to be value creating and overburdened directors affect firm performance adversely. Findings also suggest that the governance-performance relationship is also dependent upon the type of performance measures used in the study. Research limitations/implications Limitations of this study are in terms of data methodology and possible omission of some variables. It is understood that the qualitative dynamics happening inside board meetings impact corporate performance. The strategic decisions-making process adopted by the boards to fight competition or to increase market share is not available in public domain easily. The decision-making processes and monitoring for implementation of these decisions could impact corporate governance-performance relationship. These parameters and their impact on corporate performance are not covered under the scope of the present study. However, the same could have thrown more light on governance-performance relationship. Originality/value The paper adds to the emerging body of literature on corporate governance-performance relationship in the Indian context using a reasonably wider and newer data set.

Corporate governance and risk reporting: Indian evidence

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4/5) ◽  
pp. 378-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ridhima Saggar ◽  
Balwinder Singh
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Risk Information ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Regulatory Regime ◽  
Risk Disclosure ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Board Characteristics ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose This study aims to measure the extent of voluntary risk disclosure and examine the relationship between corporate governance firm level quality in the form of board characteristics and ownership concentration’s impact on risk disclosure in the annual reports of Indian listed companies. Design/methodology/approach The method adopted in this study is automated content analysis, which is applied to a sample of 100 listed Indian non-financial companies to find out the extent of risk disclosure. Further, multiple linear regressions have been applied to find out the relationship between corporate governance firm level quality in the form of board characteristics, ownership concentration and risk disclosure. Findings The findings reveal that the total number of positive risk keywords surpasses negative risk keywords disclosure. The corporate governance mainsprings, namely, board size and gender diversity have a positively significant effect on risk disclosure, whereas ownership concentration in the hands of the largest shareholder insignificantly affects risk disclosure, but identity of the largest shareholder having ownership concentration negatively affects disclosure of risk information in the case of Indian promoter body corporate, foreign promoter body corporate and non-institutions in comparison to family ownership. Research limitations/implications This study relied on a set of 39 risk keywords for measuring the extent of risk disclosure. Further, it uses a sample of 100 companies to examine the effect of corporate governance on risk disclosure at one point of time. However, a longitudinal study can help in understanding risk disclosure adopted by Indian listed companies in a better manner. Practical implications The findings have implications for regulatory bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which needs to strengthen corporate governance norms with respect to board characteristics and keep a check on ownership concentration for improving risk disclosure by companies. Originality/value To best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is a preliminary attempt linking two research lines in India, that is, corporate risk disclosure and corporate governance quality in the form of board characteristics and ownership concentration. The study identifies corporate governance firm level qualities which lead to divulgation of risk information by the companies pointing towards strengthening of regulatory regime in the country for improved corporate governance regulations adopted by listed companies.

Board characteristics and firm value for Indian companies

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Kumar Mishra ◽  
Sheeba Kapil
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Strategic Decision ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Board Characteristics

Purpose This paper aims to explore the relationship between board characteristics and firm performance for Indian companies. Design/methodology/approach Corporate governance structures of 391 Indian companies out of CNX 500 companies listed on National Stock Exchange have been studied for their impact on performance of companies. Panel data regression methodology has been used on data for five financial years from 2010 to 2014 for the selected companies. Performance measures considered are market-based measure (Tobin’s Q) and accounting-based measure (return on asset [ROA]). Findings The empirical findings indicate that the market-based measure (Tobin’s Q) is more impacted by corporate governance than the accounting-based measure (ROA). There is a significant positive association between board size and firm performance. Board independence is found significantly related to firm performance. Number of board meetings is found to be sending positive signal to the market creating firm value. Separation of chief executive officer and chairman of the board is found to be value-creating, and overburdened directors affect firm performance adversely. Research limitations/implications Limitations of the study are in terms of methodology and possible omission of some variables. It is understood that the qualitative dynamics happening inside board meetings impact corporate performance. The strategic decision-making process adopted by the boards to fight competition or to increase market share is not easily available in public domain. The decision-making processes and monitoring for implementation of those decisions could impact corporate governance performance relationship. These parameters and their impact on corporate performance are not covered under the scope of the present study. Originality/value The paper adds to the emerging body of literature on corporate governance performance relationship in the Indian context by using a reasonably wider and newer data set.

scholarly journals Board Characteristics, Corporate Performance and CEO Turnover Decisions

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-20
Author(s):  
Yahya Uthman Abdullahi ◽  
Rokiah Ishak ◽  
Norfaiezah Sawandi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Gender Diversity ◽  
Statistical Technique ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Ceo Turnover ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Board Characteristics ◽  
The Government ◽  
Board Gender Diversity

This study examines the influence of board characteristics and corporate performance on CEO turnover decisions using a sample of 144 firms from non-financial companies listed on the Nigerian Stock exchange between the periods of 2011 to 2015. The study adopts agency and resource dependency theories to support its objectives and applies a logistic regression statistical technique to analyse the results. The results show that board nominating committee has a significant positive relationship with CEO turnover and board gender diversity has a negative influence on CEO turnover. Also, the study also finds that poor corporate performance leads to CEO turnover. On the overall, the findings indicate that company performance, board nominating committee and gender diversity in the boardroom are consequential in the Nigerian corporate landscape. In line with the findings, this study suggests that the government should enact legislation on gender quota for more women appointment to the board of the corporation to better the performance of the firm, and as well to enhance the monitoring role of the board.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document