Implementing an interprofessional model of self-management support across a community workforce: A mixed-methods evaluation study

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Tino Kulnik ◽  
Heide Pöstges ◽  
Lucinda Brimicombe ◽  
John Hammond ◽  
Fiona Jones
PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. e0224951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire van der Westhuizen ◽  
Bronwyn Myers ◽  
Megan Malan ◽  
Tracey Naledi ◽  
Marinda Roelofse ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 146-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne M. van Hooft ◽  
Yvonne N. Becqué ◽  
Jolanda Dwarswaard ◽  
AnneLoes van Staa ◽  
Roland Bal

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 816-816
Author(s):  
Su-I Hou

Abstract This paper introduces the rapidly growing modern mixed methods research (MMR) and its application in a Chinese cancer screening program. While some previous researchers have incorporated quantitative and qualitative data in research, recent mixed methods developments have provided significant clarity that can guide those new to the MMR field. Understanding the context for using MMR and examining a complex mixed methods evaluation study in Taiwan can help illustrate opportunities for and application of mixed methods in Asians. The Taiwan Cervical Cancer Screening Education Program is used as an exemplar of a multi-phase complex mixed methods evaluation study showcasing various MMR designs. These include an exploratory sequential design to develop culturally sensitive study instrument, iterative concurrent and sequential mixed methods for intervention mapping, and an embedded mixed methods evaluation design to assess impact. Visual diagrams are introduced to facilitate communication of mixed methods design procedures and products in each phase.


2021 ◽  
pp. 019394592110194
Author(s):  
Nazanin Heydarian ◽  
Allyson S. Hughes ◽  
Osvaldo F. Morera

This study used mixed methods to investigate the experiences of 33 participants who are blind (PWB) and have diabetes in managing their diabetes, support (or lack thereof) from their health care providers, and diabetes distress as PWB. Participants most frequently reported barriers to check blood glucose (55%), maintaining a healthy diet (45%), and distress due to their intersectional status of having blindness and diabetes. Those who mentioned intersectional distress of managing diabetes as a PWB tended to be Braille illiterate and less likely to use mobility tools that are symbolic of blindness (e.g., white cane, guide dog). These results illuminate heterogenous characteristics of PWB with diabetes, an understudied population of public health significance, to be considered when setting priorities for diabetes self-management support and health care coverage policy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document