The transition from in-person to online supervision: Does the interaction between doctoral advisors and candidates change?

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 659-671
Author(s):  
Marc Torka
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (10) ◽  
pp. 4025-4028
Author(s):  
Jose Porro ◽  
Chaïm De Mulder ◽  
Youri Amerlinck ◽  
Elena Torfs ◽  
Sophie Balemans ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-130
Author(s):  
Jason Rushton ◽  
Jo Hutchings ◽  
Karen Shepherd ◽  
Jude Douglas

A group of geographically dispersed social work practitioners who provide professional supervision responded to an invitation put out through the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) networks to be part of an online group in late 2015. Seven members committed to meeting for one hour every eight weeks using the online meeting platform, ZoomTM. This viewpoint provides an opportunity to share our experience of the development and process of this group, with its potential for ensuring a safe reflective space and ongoing professional development. 


Kontext ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Engelhardt
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Smedegaard Bengtsen ◽  
Gry Sandholm Jensen

Through an empirical study of supervision on student assignments at the university across face-to-face and online settings, we show firstly the limiting implications of traditional dichotomies between face-to-face and online supervision. Secondly we show that more attention must be given to the way different digital tools influence the supervisory dialogue. These findings illustrate a form of ‘torn pedagogy’; that online tools and platforms destabilize and tear traditional understandings of supervision pedagogy apart. Also we forge a new concept of “format supervision” that enables supervisors to understand and reflect their supervision practice as a deliberate choice between face-to-face and online formats.


2020 ◽  
pp. 096100062094857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhui Song ◽  
Li Zhu ◽  
Fei Shu

Previous studies have presented a radical change in library and information science research topics in North America. This article investigates library and information science doctoral dissertations in China in terms of their topics and interdisciplinarity in the past 20 years. The results do not find a significant change in library and information science dissertation topics in China but reveal that the increase of library and information science doctoral research in the area of information science is attributed to an increase in admissions to Information Science majors compared to other majors (Library Science and Archive Studies). This study also shows that the academic background of library and information science doctoral advisors does not affect the interdisciplinarity of their students’ doctoral dissertations in China.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanat Nonthaputha ◽  
Montree Kumngern ◽  
Piya Prasongjan ◽  
Usa Torteanchai ◽  
Nawaphol Thepnarin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document