scholarly journals Clinical performance of the Solana® Point-of-Care Trichomonas Assay from clinician-collected vaginal swabs and urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic women

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
CA Gaydos ◽  
J Schwebke ◽  
J Dombrowski ◽  
J Marrazzo ◽  
J Coleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Vaginal Swabs ◽  
Asymptomatic Women ◽  
Urine Specimens

Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test

Diagnosis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Luca Salvagno ◽  
Gianluca Gianfilippi ◽  
Damiano Bragantini ◽  
Brandon M. Henry ◽  
Giuseppe Lippi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Rapid Screening ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Antigen Test ◽  
Community Screening ◽  
Final Study

Abstract Objectives Novel point-of-care antigen assays present a promising opportunity for rapid screening of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. The purpose of this study was the clinical assessment of the new Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test. Methods The clinical performance of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test was evaluated vs. a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) laboratory-based assay (Seegene AllplexTM2019-nCoV) in nasopharyngeal swabs collected from a series of consecutive patients referred for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics to the Pederzoli Hospital (Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy) over a 2-week period. Results The final study population consisted of 321 consecutive patients (mean age, 46 years and IQR, 32–56 years; 181 women, 56.4%), with 149/321 (46.4%) positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA via the Seegene AllplexTM2019-nCoV Assay, and 109/321 (34.0%) positive with Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test, respectively. The overall accuracy of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test compared to molecular testing was 86.9%, with 72.5% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity. Progressive decline in performance was observed as cycle threshold (Ct) values of different SARS-CoV-2 gene targets increased. The sensitivity was found to range between 97–100% in clinical samples with Ct values <25, between 50–81% in those with Ct values between 25 and <30, but low as 12–18% in samples with Ct values between 30 and <37. Conclusions The clinical performance of Roche SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test is excellent in nasopharyngeal swabs with Ct values <25, which makes it a reliable screening test in patients with high viral load. However, mass community screening would require the use of more sensitive techniques.

scholarly journals Diagnosis of SARS-Cov-2 Infection by RT-PCR Using Specimens Other Than Naso- and Oropharyngeal Swabs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 363
Author(s):  
Vânia M. Moreira ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas ◽  
Vanessa Machado ◽  
João Botelho ◽  
José João Mendes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Oropharyngeal Swab ◽  
Nucleic Acid Assays

The rapid and accurate testing of SARS-CoV-2 infection is still crucial to mitigate, and eventually halt, the spread of this disease. Currently, nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and oropharyngeal swab (OPS) are the recommended standard sampling techniques, yet, these have some limitations such as the complexity of collection. Hence, several other types of specimens that are easier to obtain are being tested as alternatives to nasal/throat swabs in nucleic acid assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This study aims to critically appraise and compare the clinical performance of RT-PCR tests using oral saliva, deep-throat saliva/posterior oropharyngeal saliva (DTS/POS), sputum, urine, feces, and tears/conjunctival swab (CS) against standard specimens (NPS, OPS, or a combination of both). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrial.gov and NIPH Clinical Trial) were searched up to the 30th of December, 2020. Case-control and cohort studies on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 were included. The methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS 2). We identified 1560 entries, 33 of which (1.1%) met all required criteria and were included for the quantitative data analysis. Saliva presented the higher accuracy, 92.1% (95% CI: 70.0–98.3), with an estimated sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI: 77.4–88.8) and specificity of 96.4% (95% CI: 89.5–98.8). DTS/POS samples had an overall accuracy of 79.7% (95% CI: 43.3–95.3), with an estimated sensitivity of 90.1% (95% CI: 83.3–96.9) and specificity of 63.1% (95% CI: 36.8–89.3). The remaining index specimens could not be adequately assessed given the lack of studies available. Our meta-analysis shows that saliva samples from the oral region provide a high sensitivity and specificity; therefore, these appear to be the best candidates for alternative specimens to NPS/OPS in SARS-CoV-2 detection, with suitable protocols for swab-free sample collection to be determined and validated in the future. The distinction between oral and extra-oral salivary samples will be crucial, since DTS/POS samples may induce a higher rate of false positives. Urine, feces, tears/CS and sputum seem unreliable for diagnosis. Saliva testing may increase testing capacity, ultimately promoting the implementation of truly deployable COVID-19 tests, which could either work at the point-of-care (e.g. hospitals, clinics) or at outbreak control spots (e.g., schools, airports, and nursing homes).

scholarly journals Immunocytochemistry Improving the Diagnosis ofTrichomonas vaginalisInfections

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thaisa Helena S. Fonseca ◽  
Fabrício M. Silva Oliveira ◽  
Marina Alacoque ◽  
Marcella Israel Rocha ◽  
Henrique Vitor Leite ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parasite Load ◽  
In Vivo Detection ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Vaginal Secretions ◽  
Vaginal Swabs ◽  
Asymptomatic Infections ◽  
Asymptomatic Women ◽  
Higher Sensitivity ◽  
Asymptomatic Hiv

The aim of this study was to evaluate the immunocytochemistry (ICC) to diagnose trichomoniasis, particularly asymptomatic infections. By culture serial dilutions, ICC was able to detect 1 trophozoite/mL, while the culture was positive up to 100 trophozoites/mL. The ICC in vivo detection capability was assessed in vaginal secretions of mice experimentally infected and in vaginal swabs from asymptomatic HIV-positive pregnant women compared with culture. All vaginal secretion samples from mice were positive according to both methods. Swabs from fifty-five asymptomatic women were positive in four (7.27%) of them by culture. Beyond these four, another ten (25.45%) women were positive by immunocytochemistry, proving their higher sensitivity (p=0.002), noticing 3.5 times more positives. ICC had better performance in both successive dilutions as in asymptomatic women, showing higher sensitivity and specificity. In this way, its facility of execution and cost-effectiveness support its practicality, as a routine procedure to diagnose trichomoniasis not only when the parasite load is lower but probably in all clinical scenarios.

scholarly journals Human Neutrophil Lipocalin as a Superior Diagnostic Means To Distinguish between Acute Bacterial and Viral Infections

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1025-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Venge ◽  
Lena Douhan-Håkansson ◽  
Daniel Garwicz ◽  
Christer Peterson ◽  
Shengyuan Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Blood ◽  
Human Neutrophil ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Acute Infections

ABSTRACTThe distinction between causes of acute infections is a major clinical challenge. Current biomarkers, however, are not sufficiently accurate. Human neutrophil lipocalin (HNL) concentrations in serum or whole blood activated by formyl-methionine-leucine-phenylalanine (fMLP) were shown to distinguish acute infections of bacterial or viral cause with high accuracy. The aim was therefore to compare the clinical performance of HNL with currently used biomarkers. Seven hundred twenty-five subjects (144 healthy controls and 581 patients with signs and symptoms of acute infections) were included in the study. C-reactive protein (CRP), the expression of CD64 on neutrophils, procalcitonin (PCT), and blood neutrophil counts were measured by established techniques, and HNL concentrations were measured in whole-blood samples after activation with fMLP. All tested biomarkers were elevated in bacterial as opposed to viral infections (P< 0.001). CRP, PCT, and CD64 expression in neutrophils was elevated in viral infections compared to healthy controls (P< 0.001). In the distinction between healthy controls and patients with bacterial infections, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were >0.85 for all biomarkers, whereas for the distinction between bacterial and viral infections, only HNL concentration in fMLP-activated whole blood showed an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of >0.90 and superior clinical performance. The clinical performance of HNL in fMLP-activated whole blood was superior to current biomarkers and similar to previous results of HNL in serum. The procedure can be adopted for point-of-care testing with response times of <15 min.

scholarly journals Clinical performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing in point of care usage in comparison to RT-qPCR

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabell Wagenhaeuser ◽  
Kerstin Knies ◽  
Vera Rauschenberger ◽  
Michael Eisenmann ◽  
Miriam McDonogh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
High Viral Load ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Protein Variant ◽  
Atypical Symptoms

Background Antigen rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for SARS-CoV-2 are fast, broadly available, and inexpensive. Despite this, reliable clinical performance data is sparse. Methods In a prospective performance evaluation study, RDT from three manufacturers (NADAL, Panbio, MEDsan) were compared to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in 5 068 oropharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a hospital setting. Viral load was derived from standardized RT-qPCR Cycle threshold (Ct) values. The data collection period ranged from November 12, 2020 to February 28, 2021. Findings Overall, sensitivity of RDT compared to RT-qPCR was 42.57% (95% CI 33.38%-52.31%), and specificity 99.68% (95% CI 99.48%-99.80%). Sensitivity declined with decreasing viral load from 100% in samples with a deduced viral load of 10^8 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per ml to 8.82% in samples with a viral load lower than 104 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies per ml. No significant differences in sensitivity or specificity could be observed between the three manufacturers, or between samples with and without spike protein variant B.1.1.7. The NPV in the study cohort was 98.84%; the PPV in persons with typical COVID-19 symptoms was 97.37%, and 28.57% in persons without or with atypical symptoms. Interpretation RDT are a reliable method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in persons with high viral load. RDT are a valuable addition to RT-qPCR testing, as they reliably detect infectious persons with high viral loads before RT-qPCR results are available. Funding German Federal Ministry for Education and Science (BMBF), Free State of Bavaria

Performance Evaluation and Multicenter Consistency Study of Smartphone-based Hipee S2 Point-of-care Testing Urine Dipstick Analyser: Evaluation Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Guoqing Wang ◽  
Xiaolong Zong ◽  
Jinghua Sun
Keyword(s):  
Health Management ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Method Comparison ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Analytical Performance ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Urine Dipstick ◽  
Quantitative Results ◽  
Carry Over

BACKGROUND With advances in mobile technology, smartphone-based point-of-care testing (POCT) urinalysis hold great potential for disease screening and health management for clinicians and individual users. The POCT devices need to have good analytical and clinical performance, but data are lacking. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analytical performance of smartphone-based Hipee S2 POCT urine dipstick analyser. METHODS A total of 1,603 urine samples from three hospitals were collected. Precision, drift, carry-over, interference, and method comparison of Hipee S2 were evaluated. RESULTS The precision for each parameter, assessed by control materials, was acceptable. No sample carry-over or drift was observed. Ascorbate solution with 1 g/L had an inhibitory effect for the haemoglobin test. Agreement for specific gravity (SG) varied between moderate to substantial, for pondus hydrogenii (pH) was moderate, and for other parameters varied between substantial to excellent, on comparing the results obtained by Hipee S2 with those measured by laboratory reference analysers. The semi-quantitative results of microalbumin and creatinine were highly correlated with the quantitative results. CONCLUSIONS Hipee S2 POCT urine analyser showed acceptable analytical performance as a semi-quantitative method. It serves as a convenient alternate device for clinicians and individual users for urinalysis and health management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document