Redesigning Services in a Patient Education Resource Center Setting: A DMAIC Quality Improvement Project

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan H. Mayer
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 196-196
Author(s):  
Kanika G. Nair ◽  
Brandie Leach ◽  
Selina Sledge ◽  
Megan Kilbane ◽  
Jennifer Bates ◽  
...  

196 Background: While most PDAC are sporadic, up to 10% are inherited. In 2018, ASCO and NCCN guidelines were updated to recommend that all patients with PDAC be considered for genetic counseling (GC) and germline testing. Furthermore, interest in treating patients with targeted therapy, such as olaparib, for germline mutations is increasing. We implemented a quality improvement project to identify the referral rate to GC for patients with PDAC, with the goal of improving the referral rate to 60%. Methods: Barriers to GC referral were identified using quality improvement tools developed at the ASCO Quality Training Program. Three “plan, do, study, act” (PDSA) cycles were implemented: 1) updating the electronic order and tumor board template to include GC recommendation (Aug–Oct 2019), 2) physician education (Nov–Dec 2019) and 3) patient education and physician reinforcement (Jan–Feb 2020). Baseline data to evaluate impact of PDSA intervention (from April to June 2019) on documented discussions about GC and placement of the referral order was completed via chart review. Results: Between April 2019 to January 2020, 199 patients with PDAC were seen in medical oncology clinic as new patient visits. Thirteen patients had previously completed GC. For the remainder, baseline discussion and referral rates were 25% and 9%, respectively. Discussion and referral rates improved to 55% and 30% after PDSA 1, to 73% and 33% after PDSA 2, and to 95% and 58% after PDSA 3, respectively. Forty-nine patients were referred at the first visit and 23 were referred at a subsequent visit. Forty-six patients underwent GC. In patients who completed germline testing 8.9% (4/45) were found to have a pathogenic variant in BRCA2, TP53, ATM, and MUTYH. Conclusions: With increased physician and patient education, we were able to improve the GC discussion rate from 25% to 95% and referral rate from 9% to 58%. While we did not meet our aim of 60% GC referral rate, we identified obstacles and outlined an improved process for early GC referrals. Enacting processes to reinforce GC referrals for patients with PDAC is likely to increase detection of germline mutations in this population.


Iproceedings ◽  
10.2196/15245 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e15245
Author(s):  
Jennifer Hoffman ◽  
Lori Burke ◽  
Cheryl Kay ◽  
Rachel Hlavaty ◽  
Jennifer Thompson-Wood ◽  
...  

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that, in the United States, 1200 women annually experience perinatal events that prove fatal and 60,000 suffer complications that are near-fatal. Postpartum morbidity and mortality may be decreased by explicit patient education. At our institution, the maternal discharge education process was varied among providers. Of the available literature, most focus on maternal knowledge of pediatric concerns with a limited amount of studies looking at maternal postpartum health. Objective The objective of this quality improvement project is to standardize postpartum education with the use of a postpartum education video available on a bedside tablet in order to improve maternal perception and knowledge of postpartum warning signs. Methods This prospective cohort study was designed using a patient survey which was administered to evaluate the effectiveness of the maternal discharge education procedures in our institution. The baseline results were reviewed by a team of physicians and nurses. A 10-question survey was provided to patients following the birth of their first baby about maternal warning signs and complications after discharge from the hospital. A standardized discharge education video was created using information from ACOG and AWHONN. The video was made accessible on bedside tablet devices. Patients were able to indicate understanding or request clarification on the devices after review of the materials, and this was communicated from the tablets to the electronic health record. All postpartum nurses were trained on the video content and how to operate the tablets. Survey responses were collected via bedside tablets following implementation of the video and were compared with the baseline results. Educational information was available to patients after discharge from the hospital via a patient portal. Results Twenty-nine women were surveyed prior to implementation of the standardized educational video available on bedside tablets. After implementation, 50 women were surveyed. Comparison of the survey responses showed there was an increase in patient-reported knowledge and understanding in all 10 questions on the survey. Of those, 4 areas were statistically significant with P values <.05: when to call 911 (82.8% before and 98% after), when to call your doctor (75.9% before and 98.0% after), heavy vaginal bleeding (62.1% before and 87.8% after), and symptoms of acute blood loss (51.7% before and 83.7% after). Conclusions The implementation of a postpartum education video available to patients on bedside tablets improved and standardized workflow for routine postpartum care and discharge processes. Survey questions regarding patient knowledge and perception of when to call 911, when to call your doctor, heavy bleeding, and signs of acute blood loss were all noted to be statistically significant. The improved perception of postpartum warning signs after the educational video appears to be beneficial in patient education at this high volume OB institution. The establishment of this platform for education became a model for education in other hospital units using bedside tablets. The use of a multidisciplinary team to review, revise, and standardize the postpartum education program at our institution was well received and supported by nurses, providers, and ultimately patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-124
Author(s):  
Jaimie Bell ◽  
Subroto Paul ◽  
Joanna Sesti ◽  
Bradi Granger

Background:Preoperative education is an important component of preparing patients for surgery. Preoperative anxiety is one of the most important problems for patients, because it causes emotional and psychiatric problems as well as physical problems. Anxiety has been associated with several pathophysiological responses such as hypertension and dysrhythmias, which can increase perioperative morbidity. Estimates suggest that between 11% and 80% of adult presurgical patients experience heightened levels of anxiety.Objective:The purpose of this pilot project was to develop a preoperative education program for thoracic surgery patients and to assess the effectiveness of the program in decreasing patient's self-reported anxiety levels using the validated Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) tool.Methods:This quality improvement project used a pre- and posttest improvement design to evaluate patient's self-reported anxiety levels at three different timepoints during the preoperative and postoperative period. A total of 15 patients from a thoracic surgery practice participated in the study.Results:The study showed no statistically significant change in patients' self-reported anxiety levels after completion of the preoperative education program (p = .538). Patients reported improvements in parameters such as expectations, pain, and preparedness.Conclusions:Although some studies have found that preoperative patient education decreases anxiety, this study supports others that indicate that anxiety is not affected by or associated with educational preparation prior to thoracic surgery. Though no statistical improvement in anxiety levels was demonstrated in this study, a majority of patients reported improvements in parameters such as expectations, pain, and preparedness.Implications for Nursing:As patient education is largely provided by the nursing profession, this article will help the profession to better understand what is important for patients to know in the preoperative setting. Setting patient expectations has a great impact on the patient's recovery and satisfaction with their surgical experience. As this is a pilot study, the goal is for continued research in the area of decreasing preoperative anxiety and preparing patients for surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document