Assessment of functional status by the Duke Activity Status Index in stable bronchiectasis

Author(s):  
Isabella Lomonaco ◽  
Amanda Souza Araújo ◽  
Mara Rúbia F. de Figueiredo ◽  
Marcelo A. Holanda ◽  
Eanes D. B. Pereira
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisakorn Vibulchai ◽  
Sureeporn Thanasilp ◽  
Sunida Preechawong ◽  
Marion E. Broome

AbstractBackground: The Duke Activity Status Index is a widely used instrument for measuring functional status in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, items and subscales on this instrument have not been validated for Thai patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI).Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI-T) in Thai patients with a previous MI using a cross-sectional study design.Methods: The DASI-T was translated using forward and backward translation methods and administered to 100 MI patients from outpatient departments of two general hospitals in Thailand. Internal consistency was determined to test reliability. Two criterion measures (i.e. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification, SF-36 physical functioning subscale) were used to test the concurrent validity of the DASI-T. Age group and CCS classification were used to determine known-groups validity of the DASI-T.Results: Cronbach’s α for the DASI-T total score was 0.76. No ceiling or floor effect was detected for the DASI-T total score. DASI-T total score was significantly correlated with the CCS classification (r = -0.68, P < 0.01) and SF-36 physical functioning subscale (r = 0.79, P < 0.01). DASI-T total scores could differentiate MI patients based on age (P = 0.040) or CCS classification (P = 0.000).Conclusion: The DASI-T is a potentially reliable and valid instrument with which to assess functional status in MI patients and is also useful to evaluate a treatment effect and be a guideline for clinical purposes (i.e. exercise prescription, risk stratification).


Author(s):  
Mariana A. Coutinho-Myrrha ◽  
Rosângela C. Dias ◽  
Aline A. Fernandes ◽  
Christiano G. Araújo ◽  
Mark A. Hlatky ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 973-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte L. Nelson ◽  
James E. Herndon ◽  
Daniel B. Mark ◽  
David B. Pryor ◽  
Robert M. Califf ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jin-Sin Koh ◽  
Olivia Y. Hung ◽  
Parham Eshtehardi ◽  
Arnav Kumar ◽  
Rani Rabah ◽  
...  

Background: Microvascular dysfunction is known to play a key role in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. We investigated the impact of ranolazine among patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial, 26 patients with angina once weekly or more, abnormal stress test, and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (<50% stenosis by angiography and fractional flow reserve >0.80) were randomized 1:1 to ranolazine or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary end point was ΔSeattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) angina frequency score. Baseline and 3 months follow-up SAQ, Duke Activity Status Index scores along with invasive fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve (CFR), hyperemic myocardial resistance, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing measurements were performed. Results: No significant differences in ΔSAQ angina frequency scores ( P =0.53) or Duke Activity Status Index ( P =0.76) were observed between ranolazine versus placebo, although patients on ranolazine had lesser improvement in SAQ physical limitation scores ( P =0.02) compared with placebo at 3 months. There were no significant differences in ΔCFR or Δhyperemic myocardial resistance between ranolazine and placebo groups. Patients treated with ranolazine, compared with placebo, had no significant improvement in maximum rate of oxygen consumption measured during incremental exercise (VO 2 max) and peak metabolic equivalents of task. Interestingly, in the ranolazine group, patients with baseline CFR<2.0 demonstrated greater gain in CFR compared with those with baseline CFR≥2.0 ( P =0.02). Conclusions: Ranolazine did not demonstrate improvement in SAQ angina frequency score, invasive microvascular function, or peak metabolic equivalent compared with placebo at 3 months. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02147067.


2016 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 534-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn M. Stevens ◽  
Ryan Crane ◽  
Myles L. Pensak ◽  
Ravi N. Samy

Outcome Objectives To (1) identify unique features of patients who underwent middle ear/mastoid obliteration with blind-sac closure of the external auditory canal for spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) otorrhea and (2) explore outcomes. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary care center. Subjects and Methods Adults treated for spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea from 2007 through 2015 were reviewed and stratified into 2 groups based on the surgery performed: (1) 11 patients underwent middle ear/mastoid obliteration with blind-sac closure of the external auditory canal and (2) 26 patients underwent other procedures. Demographics, body mass index, revised cardiac risk index, Duke Activity Status Index scores, and anticoagulation use were documented. Audiologic data were gathered from pre- and postoperative visits. The primary outcome measure was leak recurrence. Complications were tabulated. Results Poor preoperative hearing was a relative indication for obliteration. Obliteration patients had higher body mass index (43.2 vs 34.9 kg/m2; P < .05), incidence of super-morbid obesity (45% vs 7.6%; P = .015), anticoagulation usage (36% vs 0%; P = .004), cardiac risk scores (1.2 vs 0.1 dB; P < .0004), and Duke Activity Status Index scores. There was 1 leak recurrence (9%). Major and minor complication rates were 9% and 36%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 30.8 ± 8.6 months. Conclusion Middle ear and mastoid obliteration with blind-sac closure of the external auditory canal is effective for treating spontaneous CSF otorrhea. The small cohort reviewed did not experience any major perioperative morbidity. The technique may be best suited for patients with poor hearing, the infirm, and those in whom craniotomy is contraindicated.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuzhen Fan ◽  
Kyoung Suk Lee ◽  
Susan K Frazier ◽  
Terry A Lennie ◽  
Debra K Moser

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 635-635
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Reynolds ◽  
Rachel Myers ◽  
Josh West ◽  
Katey Sweat ◽  
Virginia McGhee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document