Changing clinical practice: Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of a nationwide videofluoroscopy evidence-based guideline

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-78
Author(s):  
Arianne Mendoza Lemire ◽  
Anna Miles ◽  
Clare M. McCann
2017 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-425
Author(s):  
Neil Bhattacharyya ◽  
Deena B. Hollingsworth ◽  
Kathryn Mahoney ◽  
Sarah O’Connor

Objective. This plain language summary serves as an overview in explaining benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, abbreviated BPPV. This summary applies to patients ≥18 years old with a suspected or potential diagnosis of BPPV and is based on the 2017 “Clinical Practice Guideline: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (Update).” The evidence-based guideline includes research to support more effective diagnosis and treatment of BPPV. The guideline was developed as a quality improvement opportunity for managing BPPV by creating clear recommendations to use in medical practice.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 183-183
Author(s):  
Vishal Kukreti ◽  
Roxanne Cosby ◽  
Annie Cheung ◽  
Marie Hamasoor ◽  
Sherrie Hertz ◽  
...  

183 Background: Although information technology (IT) has the potential to improve the quality and safety of patient care, introduction into the clinical work flow may create unanticipated consequences. IT solutions such as computerized physician order entry (CPOE) are often designed and executed without end-user involvement. An evidence based guideline for systemic treatment (ST) CPOE was developed. The guideline looks at the features, functionalities and components of a ST CPOE system required to ensure safe and high-quality care. Methods: The guideline was developed by an interdisciplinary panel of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, methodologists, IT specialists, and human factors experts. A systematic review was conducted of the available clinical and technology literature and key informant interviews were conducted. Role-specific CPOE functionalities were process mapped for physicians, nurses and pharmacists. Two expert panels (i.e., clinical and supporting tools) were convened to review the information and provide feedback on guideline content. The guideline was also reviewed externally by content experts from provincial, national and international organizations. Results: The resulting evidence-based guideline focused on two distinct yet interconnected parts: clinical practice (e.g., error prevention, unanticipated consequences, impact on practice, clinical decision support), and technology requirements (e.g., usability features, system integration, effective alerts, audit logs, regimen building). The recommendations also highlight the importance of change management strategies and clinician engagement. Conclusions: This innovative guideline provides an approach to technology evaluation focusing on clinical practice needs driving IT solutions. Future research to help standardize design and usability of such systems is necessary. The non-vendor specific recommendations can be used as the foundation for evaluation of ST CPOE systems to reduce errors, improve safety, and support clinical practice. The application of the recommendations as an assessment of ST CPOE system guideline concordance will also be valuable.


2017 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helene J. Krouse ◽  
Anthony E. Magit ◽  
Sarah O’Connor ◽  
Seth R. Schwarz ◽  
Sandra A. Walsh

This plain language summary serves as an overview in explaining earwax (cerumen). The summary applies to patients older than 6 months with a clinical diagnosis of earwax impaction and is based on the 2017 update of the Clinical Practice Guideline: Earwax (Cerumen Impaction). The evidence-based guideline includes research that supports diagnosis and treatment of earwax impaction. The guideline was developed to improve care by health care providers for managing earwax impaction by creating clear recommendations to use in medical practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helene J. Krouse ◽  
Charles (Charlie) W. Reavis ◽  
Robert J. Stachler ◽  
David O. Francis ◽  
Sarah O’Connor

This plain language summary for patients serves as an overview in explaining hoarseness (dysphonia). The summary applies to patients in all age groups and is based on the 2018 “Clinical Practice Guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia) (Update).” The evidence-based guideline includes research to support more effective identification and management of patients with hoarseness (dysphonia). The primary purpose of the guideline is to improve the quality of care for patients with hoarseness (dysphonia) based on current best evidence.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Van Loon ◽  
Roland Bal

This article explores how developers address uncertainty in the creation of an evidence-based guideline (EBG). As the aim of an EBG is to assist healthcare practitioners in situations of doubt, it is easy to assume that uncertainty has no place in guidelines. However, as we discovered, guideline development does not ignore uncertainty but seeks to accept it while establishing credible recommendations for healthcare. Dealing with omissions in knowledge, ignorance, or challenges in valuating different sorts of knowledge form the core of the work of guideline developers. Interviewing guideline developers, we found three types of valuation work: classifying studies, grading types of knowledge, and involving expertise and clinical practice. These methods have consequences for the credibility, and amount and kind of uncertainty EBGs can include.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
George P. Browman ◽  
Julie Makarski ◽  
Paula Robinson ◽  
Melissa Brouwers

Purpose Panels of experts are used to develop clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) intended to be used by practitioners “in-the-field.” Therefore, oncologists’ participation in CPG development is an important strategy to promote CPG adoption. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contributions of oncologists in-the-field to evidence-based CPG development using data from Ontario’s cancer system. Methods CPG development in Ontario includes surveys of oncologists’ opinions, using a structured questionnaire, about draft recommendations that were developed from rigorous systematic reviews of evidence prepared by expert panels. Two research assistants reviewed background documents to trace the changes in CPG recommendations from draft to final stage to determine the contribution of oncologists’ input to final recommendations. Changes to recommendations were categorized as either substantive (content or tone) or minor (ideas clarification or edits). Results From 2000 to 2003, 43 CPGs were developed. There were 87 changes to draft recommendations for 31 CPGs, of which 40 changes to 19 CPGs could be attributed to survey input from practicing oncologists. Of the 40 changes, 28 (70%) were judged to be substantive. Conclusion Despite a rigorous evidence-based process for CPG development, practicing oncologists contribute substantially to the final recommendations approved by the expert panel. It is hypothesized that the responsiveness of expert panels to input from oncologists in-the-field will facilitate adoption of CPGs.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4230-4230
Author(s):  
Michaela Rancea ◽  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Peter Borchmann ◽  
Bastian von Tresckow ◽  
Teresa Halbsguth ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4230 Background: Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is one of the most common malignancies in young adults and has become curable for the majority of patients even in advanced stage. Nowadays, the main challenges are to develop strategies that decrease secondary malignancies and mortality, as well as to retain fertility after treatment. So far, there is no national or international evidence-based guideline giving recommendations for clinical practice in the treatment of HL patients. For this reason, various medical societies, clinical experts from the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) and methodological experts from the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group (CHMG) have developed and consented a clinical practice guideline to improve and standardize diagnosis, treatment and follow-up for HL patients. This project was funded by the German Program for Guidelines in Oncology Implementation. Aims: To emphasize the clinically most relevant guideline recommendations related to diagnostics, treatment and follow-up of adult HL patients. Methods: Randomized controlled trials, systeamtic reviews, cohort studies and specific sensitive data included from systematic literature searches in CENTRAL and MEDLINE were appraised for quality and summarized in evidence tables. Based on these tables and trials, guideline authors generated high quality clinical recommendation in an intensive collaboration with the methodological experts clinical experts from different multi-interdisciplinary working-groups. During the final consensus conference, a total of 160 evidence-based recommendations were consented. Results: There is a strong consensus that all patients should be treated within a clinical trial. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for all stages of HL. The histological diagnosis should be confirmed by a reference pathologist. For early favorable stages, two cycles of ABVD followed by involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) at 20 Gy are strongly recommended; early unfavorable stages should be treated with 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalated followed by 2 cycles of ABVD and IF-RT of 30 Gy; for advanced stages six cycles of BEACOPP escalated followed by 30 Gy radiotherapy on PET-positive residual mass ≥ 2cm is strongly recommended. It is also recommended that patients with relapses or refractory disease, and without severe co-morbidities, receive autologous stem cell transplantation, but not myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Additionally, treatment options of subgroups, such as nodular lymphocyte predominant HL, elderly patients or those with co-morbidities such as HIV, are specified in this guideline. The additional benefit of PET remains uncertain as of the lack of high-quality evidence, therefore different recommendations have been provided for staging, interim and follow-up evaluations. It is highly important that health care professionals discuss aspects of fertility protection with female and male patients before starting any treatment. Options for preserving fertility in women have to be adopted to treatment intensity. For male patients, it is recommended to cyropreserve sperm cells before starting the therapy, independently of treatment intensity. There is strong consensus that patients have to prevent to conceive a child during treatment. Health-care professionals should encourage patients to exercise and should discuss potential harms of complementary medicine with the patient. Due to their immunomudulating effect, it is not recommended to take mistletoes at any time. It is strongly recommended to motivate patients to give up smoking, due to the strong associated increased risk of secondary tumors, especially bronchial carcinoma. Structured follow-up care should be provided and should in particular detect relapses, long-term organ toxicities and secondary malignancies. Summary/Conclusions: The first evidence-based guideline on the treatment of patients with HL translates scientific evidence and expert knowledge into precise recommendations for these patients into clinical practice. In addition to this clinical value, the guideline will enable healthcare professionals to improve patient information and quality management. Disclosures: Engert: Takeda, Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding. Borchmann:Millenium The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding, Travel Grants Other. von Tresckow:Millenium The Takeda Oncology Company: Honoraria, Travel Grants Other.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document