scholarly journals Occupational noise exposure and Raynaud’s phenomenon: a nested case–control study

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 1969745
Author(s):  
Albin Stjernbrandt ◽  
Mahmoud Abu Mdaighem ◽  
Hans Pettersson
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 30-30
Author(s):  
Feixia Wang ◽  
Xianping Song ◽  
Fenglei Li ◽  
Ying Bai ◽  
Lei Han ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albin Stjernbrandt ◽  
Hans Pettersson ◽  
Ingrid Liljelind ◽  
Tohr Nilsson ◽  
Jens Wahlström

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1649-1655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriano Dias ◽  
Ricardo Cordeiro

Noise is the most frequent type of occupational exposure and can lead to both auditory and extra-auditory dysfunction as well as increasing the risk of work accidents. The purpose of this study was to estimate the attributable fraction of work accidents related to occupational noise exposure in a medium-sized city in Southeast Brazil. In this hospital-based case-control study, including 600 cases and 822 controls, the odds ratio of work accidents (controlled for several covariables) was obtained classifying occupational noise exposure into four levels and determining the prevalence at each level. Based on these data, the calculated attributable fraction was 0.3041 (95%CI: 0.2341-0.3676), i.e., 30% of work accidents in the study area were statistically associated with occupational noise exposure. The authors discuss the causes of this association and the implications for the prevention of work accidents.


2020 ◽  
Vol 189 (11) ◽  
pp. 1342-1347
Author(s):  
Lisa Aarhus ◽  
Kristina Kjærheim ◽  
Sanna Heikkinen ◽  
Jan Ivar Martinsen ◽  
Eero Pukkala ◽  
...  

Abstract It has been suggested that the association between self-reported occupational noise exposure and vestibular schwannoma (VS), found in several studies, represents recall bias. Therefore, we aimed to study the relationship in a large case-control study using occupational noise measurements. We performed a case-control study using data from Sweden for 1,913 VS cases diagnosed in 1961–2009 and 9,566 age- and sex-matched population controls. We defined occupational history by linkage to national censuses from 1960, 1970, 1980, and 1990. We estimated occupational noise exposure for each case and control using a job-exposure matrix. There was no association between occupational noise exposure and VS. Among subjects assessed as ever exposed to occupational noise levels of ≥85 dB (214 cases and 1,142 controls), the odds ratio for VS per 5 years of exposure was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.17). Workers with noise levels of ≥85 dB for at least 15 years (5-year latency period), showed no increased risk of VS (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.73, 1.31) compared with those who had never been exposed to noise levels of 75 dB or higher. In summary, our large study does not support an association between occupational noise exposure and VS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 991-1001
Author(s):  
Isabelle Deltour ◽  
Amélie Massardier-Pilonchery ◽  
Brigitte Schlehofer ◽  
Klaus Schlaefer ◽  
Martine Hours ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna-Liisa Hartikainen-Sorri ◽  
Martti Sorri ◽  
Hannu P. Anttonen ◽  
Risto Tuimala ◽  
Esa L��r�

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 891-901
Author(s):  
Rosa María Tapia-Haro ◽  
Rafael Guisado-Barrilao ◽  
María del Carmen García-Ríos ◽  
Enrique Raya-Álvarez ◽  
José Manuel Pérez-Mármol ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To evaluate pain intensity, widespread pressure pain, central sensitization (CS), and catastrophizing between subjects with primary and secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) and healthy controls and to compare the relationships between vascular impairment and pain perception. Methods A preliminary case–control study was performed with a total sample of 57 participants (37 with RP). Sociodemographic data, clinical/vascular data, and pain variables (pain intensity, pressure pain sensitivity, pain magnitude and threshold, CS, and catastrophizing) were registered. Results were analyzed by analysis of covariance and Pearson correlation. Results Participants with RP had a lower basal temperature (more vasoconstriction) in their hands (P ≤ 0.012), higher pain intensity (P ≤ 0.001), higher electrical pain magnitude (P < 0.001), and lower pressure pain (P ≤ 0.05) and electrical pain (P < 0.001) thresholds in comparison with healthy controls. Secondary RP participants showed a significantly higher level of CS compared with controls and primary RP participants (P = 0.001). Catastrophizing was higher in the primary and secondary RP (P ≤ 0.001) groups than in controls. No correlations were observed between severity of vasoconstriction and pain variables. Conclusions RP participants showed bilateral hypersensitivity to pressure pain. However, the severity of vascular alterations seems not to be related to central pain experiences. Additional mechanisms such as catastrophizing may influence pain in RP; nevertheless, central sensitization only appears to be involved in the secondary form of RP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document