A Note on the impact of the United States federal budget deficit on the intermediate-term interest rate, 1960–94

1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 711-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Cebula
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-97
Author(s):  
Richard J. Cebula

Abstract Using four decades of data, this exploratory empirical study adopts a loanable funds model to investigate the impact of the federal budget deficit in the U.S. on the Ex Ante real interest rate yield on ten-year Treasury notes. For the 40- year period 1973-2012, empirical estimation using quarterly data reveals that the Ex Ante real interest rate yield on ten-year U.S. Treasury notes was an increasing function of the Ex Ante real interest rate yield on Moody's Aaa-rated corporate bonds, the Ex Ante real interest rate yield on three-month Treasury bills, and the increase in per capita real GDP, while being a decreasing function of net capital inflows (as a percent of GDP) and the monetary base (as a percent of GDP). In addition, it is found that the federal budget deficit (as a percent of GDP) exercised a positive and statistically significant impact on the Ex Ante real interest rate yield on ten-year Treasury notes, a finding consistent in principle with a number of prior studies of various interest rate measures during shorter and earlier time periods. A robustness test using the Ex Ante real seven-year Treasury note yield and annual data supports these findings.


Author(s):  
Р. Аландаров ◽  
R. Alandarov ◽  
Э. Зайцева ◽  
E. Zayceva

Information on the state of the Federal budget (surplus or deficit) is insufficient for an adequate, complete assessment of the state of the country’s economy. The budget deficit does not always speak only about the negative impact on the economy. From the point of view of economic theory, a budget surplus does not always mean that the policy of the state is successful and competent. The budget surplus indicates that the state has left free money that was not used to Finance important projects, which means the underutilization of potential. It is necessary to analyze the Federal budget deficit: what exactly is its cause, and most importantly — what sources of funding are attracted.


Author(s):  
D.M. Mikhaylov

The article tested a modification of the G. Markowitz’s model for the task of managing the federal budget deficit in the formation of the federal law about the federal budget for the next fiscal year and for the planning period. The logical-mathematical method of empirical research was used in modeling with the use of theoretical conclusions in the sphere of public finance. The possibility of practical use of such a model is justified by the given assessment of the model parameters based on actual data for 2010-2017. Based on historical data, restrictions on the marginal volume of revenue planning from deficit financing sources are assumed. Because of macroeconomic uncertainty potential revenues are projected using interval coefficients. The effectiveness of the federal budget deficit management portfolio constructed according to the model is proposed to be compared with the deficit management parameters laid down in the federal budget in 2018. In addition, based on the assessment of the impact of diversification and expectations of economic agents (in the model presented as "transaction costs") the article discussed the feasibility of using the model in planning the management of the federal budget deficit. Taking into account the empirical results it is concluded that ignoring the expectations of the planning period in the formation of the federal budget deficit management strategy can lead to significant losses in revenues.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 198-208
Author(s):  
Don Capener ◽  
Richard Cebula ◽  
Fabrizio Rossi

Purpose To investigate the impact of the federal budget deficit (expressed as a per cent of the Gross Domestic Product, GDP) in the US on the ex ante real interest rate yield on Moody’s Baa-rated corporate bonds and to provide evidence that is both contemporary and covers an extended time period, namely, 1960 through 2015. Design/methodology/approach The analysis constructs a loanable funds model that involves a variety of financial and economic variables, with the ex ante real interest rate yield on Moody’s Baa-rated long-term corporate bonds as the dependent variable. The dependent variable is contemporaneous with the federal budget deficit and two other interest rate measures. Accordingly, instrumental variables are identified for each of these contemporaneous explanatory variables. The model also consists of four additional (lagged) explanatory variables. The model is then estimated using auto-regressive, i.e., AR(1), two-stage least squares. Findings The principal finding is that the ex ante real interest rate yield on Moody’s Baa rated corporate bonds is an increasing function of the federal budget deficit, expressed as a per cent of GDP. In particular, if the federal budget deficit were to rise by one per centage point, say from 3 to 4 per cent of GDP, the ex ante real interest rate would rise by 58 basis points. Research limitations/implications There are other time-series techniques that could be applied to the topic, such as co-integration, although the AR(1) process is tailored for studying volatile series such as interest rates and stock prices. Practical/implications The greater the US federal budget deficit, the greater the real cost of funds to firms. Hence, the high budget deficits of recent years have led to the crowding out of investment in new plant, new equipment, and new technology. These impacts lower economic growth and restrict prosperity in the US over time. Federal budget deficits must be substantially reduced so as to protect the US economy. Social/implications Higher budget deficits act to reduce investment in ew plant, new equipment and new technology. This in turn reduces job growth and real GDP growth and compromises the health of the economy. Originality/value This is the first study to focus on the impact of the federal budget deficit on the ex ante real long term cost of funds to firms in decades. Nearly all related studies fail to focus on this variable. Since, in theory, this variable (represented by the ex ante real yield on Moody’s Baa rated long term corporate bonds) is a key factor in corporate investment decisions, the empirical findings have potentially very significant implications for US firms and for the economy as a whole in view of the extraordinarily high budget deficits of recent years.


2021 ◽  
pp. 812-825
Author(s):  
Elina Vsevolodovna Kirichenko

The article analyzes the structure of the US federal budget, the main sources of revenues, expenditures (annually revised discretionary spendings, mandatory financing of the main social and a number of critical areas of government activity, interest debt payments), factors affecting their dynamics. A special place is occupied by the analysis of the national (sovereign) debt of the United States, which includes two types of debt: the government’s debt to buyers of its securities (American individuals and legal entities, the Federal Reserve System, international investors, foreign governments) and the so-called intragovernmental debt. The article raises the question of where the "red line" is when the growing debt becomes dangerous for the United States. However, the article lists factors that mitigate the sovereign debt problem for the United States. Much attention is paid to the challenges that the administration of J. Biden and the Congress of the current and future convocations will have to face. In particular, in the short term, this is the need to reduce the budget deficit, to extend a number of social programs that are about to expire, but above all to resolve the debt ceiling issues. The paradoxes of decision-making in the budget process concerning the debt ceiling are considered. The points of view of experts are presented, arguing the need for refusal and preservation of the legislative codification of the debt ceiling. In the long term, the United States will face challenges such as a growing debt burden, the need to reform the budgetary decision-making process. The Congress will have to worry about how to defuse the time bomb laid down in a number of mandatory budget programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document