Secular trends in peri- and neonatal mortality in breech presentation; Norway 1967-1994

2000 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 508-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
SUSANNE ALBRECHTSEN ◽  
SVEIN RASMUSSEN ◽  
LORENTZ M. IRGENS
PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e0145768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elie Azria ◽  
Gilles Kayem ◽  
Bruno Langer ◽  
Laetitia Marchand-Martin ◽  
Stephane Marret ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 45 (4, Part 2 of 2) ◽  
pp. 254A-254A
Author(s):  
Deepa Ranganathan ◽  
Stephen N Wall ◽  
Babak Khoshnood ◽  
Jaideep K Singh ◽  
Kwang-sun Lee

2020 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
pp. 1015-1023
Author(s):  
Diane Korb ◽  
François Goffinet ◽  
Florence Bretelle ◽  
Olivier Parant ◽  
Didier Riethmuller ◽  
...  

1969 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 597-602
Author(s):  
NASIM AKHTAR

BACKGROUND: Since the publication of term breech trail there had been a dramatic changeworldwide from selective to planned Cesarean Section for all women with breech presentation at term.This high cesarean section rate led to adverse consequences in subsequent pregnancy &on futurefertility. Choice of safest mode of delivery has always been a dilemma.OBJECTIVE: Prospective interventional study. This study was done to determine the safety of vaginalbreech birth in terms of neonatal & maternal complications, so that to encourage the trend of breechdelivery in carefully selected cases & to discourage the trend of routinely recommending cesareansection for all gravidas with fetus in breech presentation at term. The study was conducted atDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynae Mardan Medical Complex from January 2010 to December 2015.PATIENTS & METHOD: About 809 patients with singleton pregnancy with breech presentation wereincluded. Decision about mode of delivery was taken on the basis of clinical judgment and ultrasoundwhich was further reviewed in the light of rate of progress during labour .Delivery was conducted byexperienced obstetrician. Mother & infants were followed up to 6 wks post partum. The primaryoutcome was neonatal mortality, infant mortality & serious infant morbidity.RESULTS: out of 809 total patients with breech presentation, 714 were planned for vaginal delivery674 delivered (83%) while 40 pts (5%) had emergency Cesarean Sections.95 patients (12%) hadElective cesarean section. In the delivery group two (0.29%) neonates had serious neonatal morbidity. Inthe cesarean group there was no serious neonatal morbidity. Infection & blood loss was greater in thecesarean group. There were no serious maternal complications in the vaginal delivery group. Thedifference between neonatal morbidity, perinatal mortality &neonatal mortality between the two groupswas not significant.CONCLUSION: Vaginal breech delivery is still a safe option which better suits the clinical situation&problems of our patients .In our set up, Cesarean section should not be routinely advised to patientswith breech presentation no matter it may be the best management option in developed countries.Careful case selection & vigilant monitoring of progress of labour will save many patients fromunnecessary section without costing extra morbidity & mortality.KEY WORDS: Breech presentation, Breech Delivery, Cesarean section, Apgar score.


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (04) ◽  
pp. 526-529
Author(s):  
BUSHRA MUKHTAR, ◽  
BUSHRA KHAN ◽  
NUZHAT RASHEED

Objective: To compare the fetal outcome of elective cesarean section with elective vaginal birth for Term Breechpresentation in terms of APGAR Score, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Admission in Neonatology Unit and Neonatal mortality. Design:Quasi experimental study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecololgy Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur. Methods: Total 120cases were included in the study divided into two groups, each having 60 fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Group 'A' had those who deliveredby planned cesarean and Group 'B' comprised those having planned vaginal delivery. Results: It was found that neonatal mortality was3.33 in vaginal and 0 in cesarean group. Mean APGAR Score at 1 and 5 minute was 8.47 and 9.53 in vaginal and 8.58 and 9.62 incesarean group. RDS was more in cesarean (5) than vaginal group (1.6). Admission in Neonatalogy Unit was more in vaginally deliveredgroup (8.33) as compared to the cesarean section group (5). Conclusion: Planned cesarean delivery in breech presentation at term isassociated with a reduction in neonatal mortality and morbidity as compared to the planned vaginal birth.


Twin Research ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Rydhstroem

AbstractThe aim was to analyse the neonatal mortality related to mode of delivery for twins using a population-based registry. In all, 18,125 twins delivered in Sweden between 1991 and 1997, after excluding those with unknown gestational duration, were used to analyse the differences between groups of twins. Results showed the OR for neonatal death, breech vaginal delivery versus caesarean section (all indications) was 1.47 (95% CI 0.99-2.17). The OR at vaginal delivery for neonatal death, twin I in breech versus cephalic presentation was 5.60 (2.62-11.94) and for twin II the corresponding figures were 1.85 (1.03-3.32). Analyses using population-based registries from other countries are needed to confirm or reject the present findings of an increased neonatal mortality for twins in breech presentation delivered vaginally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document