Objective: Accurate assessment of breast tumor size preoperatively is important for the
initial decision-making in surgical approach. Therefore, we aimed to compare efficacy of mammography
and ultrasonography in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of breast cancer.
Methods:
Preoperative mammography and ultrasonography were performed on 104 women with
DCIS of breast cancer. We compared the accuracy of each of the imaging modalities with pathological
size by Pearson correlation. For each modality, it was considered concordant if the difference
between imaging assessment and pathological measurement is less than 0.5cm.
Results:
At pathological examination tumor size ranged from 0.4cm to 7.2cm in largest diameter.
For mammographically determined size versus pathological size, correlation coefficient of r was
0.786 and for ultrasonography it was 0.651. Grouped by breast composition, in almost entirely fatty
and scattered areas of fibroglandular dense breast, correlation coefficient of r was 0.790 for mammography
and 0.678 for ultrasonography; in heterogeneously dense and extremely dense breast,
correlation coefficient of r was 0.770 for mammography and 0.548 for ultrasonography. In microcalcification
positive group, coeffient of r was 0.772 for mammography and 0.570 for ultrasonography.
In microcalcification negative group, coeffient of r was 0.806 for mammography and 0.783
for ultrasonography.
Conclusion:
Mammography was more accurate than ultrasonography in measuring the largest
cancer diameter in DCIS of breast cancer. The correlation coefficient improved in the group of almost
entirely fatty/ scattered areas of fibroglandular dense breast or in microcalcification negative
group.
Breast cancer supplemental screening: Women’s knowledge and utilization in the era of dense breast legislation
