X-ray and gamma-ray emission of Sagittarius A* as a wind-accreting black hole

1994 ◽  
Vol 426 ◽  
pp. 599 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mastichiadis ◽  
L. M. Ozernoy
1998 ◽  
Vol 502 (1) ◽  
pp. 428-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor V. Moskalenko ◽  
Werner Collmar ◽  
Volker Schonfelder

1993 ◽  
Vol 405 ◽  
pp. L59 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Barret ◽  
P. Mandrou ◽  
M. Denis ◽  
J. F. Olive ◽  
P. Laurent ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
G. L. CASE ◽  
E. ANZALONE ◽  
M.L. CHERRY ◽  
J. C. RODI ◽  
J. C. LING ◽  
...  

Galaxies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Varsha Chitnis ◽  
Amit Shukla ◽  
K. P. Singh ◽  
Jayashree Roy ◽  
Sudip Bhattacharyya ◽  
...  

Gamma-ray emission from the bright radio source 3C 84, associated with the Perseus cluster, is ascribed to the radio galaxy NGC 1275 residing at the centre of the cluster. Study of the correlated X-ray/gamma-ray emission from this active galaxy, and investigation of the possible disk-jet connection, are hampered because the X-ray emission, particularly in the soft X-ray band (2–10 keV), is overwhelmed by the cluster emission. Here we present a method to spectrally decouple the cluster and active galactic nucleus (AGN) emission in imaging X-ray detectors. We use three sets of simultaneous Niel Gehrels Swift XRT and NuStar data. These observations were made during the period 2015 November to 2017 February, when a huge increase in the gamma-ray emission was observed. We find that the gamma-ray emission shows a very high degree of variability (40%–50%) on time scales of 1–10 days, whereas the hard X-ray emission, associated with the AGN, shows a low variability (∼15%–30%), on various time scales in the range of 0.01–60 days.


2020 ◽  
Vol 808 ◽  
pp. 135624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Ballesteros ◽  
Javier Coronado-Blázquez ◽  
Daniele Gaggero

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (S279) ◽  
pp. 75-82
Author(s):  
Paolo A. Mazzali

AbstractThe properties of the Supernovae discovered in coincidence with long-duration Gamma-ray Bursts and X-Ray Flashes are reviewed, and compared to those of SNe for which GRBs are not observed. The SNe associated with GRBs are of Type Ic, they are brighter than the norm, and show very broad absorption lines in their spectra, indicative of high expansion velocities and hence of large explosion kinetic energies. This points to a massive star origin, and to the birth of a black hole at the time of core collapse. There is strong evidence for gross asymmetries in the SN ejecta. The observational evidence seems to suggest that GRB/SNe are more massive and energetic than XRF/SNe, and come from more massive stars. While for GRB/SNe the collapsar model is favoured, XRF/SNe may host magnetars.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document