Indices of Surgical Site Infection Risk and Prediction of Other Adverse Outcomes During Hospitalization

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 825-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez ◽  
Silvia Palma ◽  
Antonio Gómez-Ortega ◽  
Gabriel Martínez-Gallego ◽  
Marcelino Medina-Cuadros
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Postsurgical Outcomes ◽  
Better Than

Objective.To assess which adverse postsurgical outcomes are best predicted by the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC) index and the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system (NNIS) index.Design.Prospective cohort study.Setting.The service of general surgery at a tertiary care hospital.Patients.A consecutive series of patients hospitalized for more than 1 day (n= 2,989).Results.The outcome best predicted by the SENIC and NNIS indices was assessed by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The areas under the ROC curves for nosocomial infection and in-hospital death were higher for the NNIS index than they were for the SENIC index (P<.05). The NNIS index predicted in-hospital death better than it predicted surgical site infection (area under the ROC curve ± SE, 0.836 ± 0.022 vs 0.689 ± 0.017;P= .001).Conclusions.The NNIS index is superior to the SENIC index for all adverse postsurgical outcomes. Its ability to predict in-hospital mortality is clearly better than its ability to predict surgical site infection.

Indices of Surgical Site Infection Risk and Prediction of Other Adverse Outcomes During Hospitalization

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 825-828
Author(s):  
Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez ◽  
Silvia Palma ◽  
Antonio Gómez-Ortega ◽  
Gabriel Martínez-Gallego ◽  
Marcelino Medina-Cuadros
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Postsurgical Outcomes ◽  
Better Than

Objective.To assess which adverse postsurgical outcomes are best predicted by the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC) index and the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance system (NNIS) index.Design.Prospective cohort study.Setting.The service of general surgery at a tertiary care hospital.Patients.A consecutive series of patients hospitalized for more than 1 day (n = 2,989).Results.The outcome best predicted by the SENIC and NNIS indices was assessed by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The areas under the ROC curves for nosocomial infection and in-hospital death were higher for the NNIS index than they were for the SENIC index (P<.05). The NNIS index predicted in-hospital death better than it predicted surgical site infection (area under the ROC curve ± SE, 0.836 ± 0.022 vs 0.689 ± 0.017; P = .001).Conclusions.The NNIS index is superior to the SENIC index for all adverse postsurgical outcomes. Its ability to predict in-hospital mortality is clearly better than its ability to predict surgical site infection.

Surgical site infection in colorectal surgeries: Experience in tertiary care hospital

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S11
Author(s):  
Afshan Anjum Wani ◽  
Nisar Ahmad Chowdri ◽  
Fazal Q. Parray ◽  
Rouf A. Wani
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Site Infection

scholarly journals Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies in a Tertiary Care Hospital: a Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. E202043
Author(s):  
Aamir Hussain Hela ◽  
Haseeb Mohammad Khandwaw ◽  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
Mir Adnan Samad
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed surgical procedure of digestive tract. It has replaced open cholecystectomy as gold standard treatment for cholelithiasis and inflammation of gallbladder.  It is estimated that approximately 90% of cholecystectomies in the  United States are performed using a laparoscopic approach.  The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in context to its complications, morbidity and mortality in a tertiary care hospital.  Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 1200 patients, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomies, during the period from January 2019 to December 2019, at Government Medical College Jammu J & K, India and necessary data was collected and reviewed. Results: In our study, a total of 1200 patients were studied including 216 males (18%) and 984 females (82%). The mean age of the patients was 43.35±8.61. The mean operative time in our study was 55.5±10.60 minutes with range of 45 – 90 minutes. Conversion rate was 2.6%. 2 patients were re-explored. Bile duct injury was found in 6 patients (0.5%).  Conclusions: Gallstone disease is a global health problem. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has now replaced open cholecystectomy as the first choice of treatment for gallstones. Gall stone diseases is most frequently encountered in female population. The risk factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy include male gender, previous abdominal surgery, acute cholecystitis, dense adhesions and fibrosis in Calot’ s triangle, anatomical variations, advanced age, comorbidity, obesity, suspicion of common bile duct stones, jaundice, and decreased surgeon experience. The incidence of surgical site infection has significantly decreased in laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to open cholecystectomy. In our study we could not find any case of surgical site infection.

Surgical-site infections in emergency abdominal paediatric surgeries at a tertiary-care hospital in Pakistan

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ali Faisal Saleem ◽  
Huma Faiz Halepota ◽  
Hasaan Omar ◽  
Areeba Zain ◽  
Muhammad Arif Mateen Khan
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Stable Condition ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pathogen Occurrence

Abstract A retrospective chart review was carried out in children (neonates to 18 years) who underwent acute surgical abdominal exploration during 2012-2016 at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, to evaluate the post-operative surgical site infection rates in emergency paediatric abdominal surgery. Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) was estimated. P-value was calculated, chi-square and non-parametric tests were performed by comparing pre-surgical and post-surgical procedure pathogen occurrence and pre-procedure wound status. Pathogen occurrence related to time-trend of 98 paediatric patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery was plotted. Of the 94 who were discharged in stable condition, it was found that there was no significant difference between pre- and post-surgical pathogens. Escherichia coli (n=10) was found to be the most common pathogen. Contaminated wounds were associated with higher SSI (p=0.036, OR 1.95 95% CI 0.7-5.4). Continuous...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document