Risk of Hand or Glove Contamination After Contact With Patients Colonized With Vancomycin-ResistantEnterococcusor the Colonized Patients' Environment

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary K. Hayden ◽  
Donald W. Blom ◽  
Elizabeth A. Lyle ◽  
Charity G. Moore ◽  
Robert A. Weinstein

Objective.To estimate the level of hand or glove contamination with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) among healthcare workers (HCWs) who touch a patient colonized with VRE and/or the colonized patient's environment during routine care.Design.Structured observational study.Setting.Medical intensive care unit of a 700-bed, tertiary-care teaching hospital.Participants.VRE-colonized patients and their caregivers.Methods.We obtained samples from sites on the intact skin of 22 patients colonized with VRE and samples from sites in the patients' rooms, before and after routine care, during 27 monitoring episodes. A total of 98 unique HCWs were observed during 131 HCW observations. Observers recorded the sites touched by HCWs. Culture samples were obtained from HCWs' hands and gloves before and after care.Results.VRE were isolated from a mean (±SD) of 55% ± 24% of patient sites (n= 256) and 17% ± 12% of environmental sites (n= 1,572). Most HCWs (131 [56%]) touched both the patient and the patient's environment; no HCW touched only the patient. Of 103 HCWs whose hand samples were negative for VRE when they entered the room, 52% contaminated their hands or gloves after touching the environment, and 70% contaminated their hands or gloves after touching the patient and the environment (P= .101). In a univariate logistic regression model, the risk of hand or glove contamination was associated with the number of contacts made (odds ratio, 1.1 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.19). In a multivariate model, the effect of the number of contacts could not be distinguished from the effect of type of contact (ie, touching the environment alone or touching both the patient and the environment). Overall, 37% of HCWs who did not wear gloves contaminated their hands, and 5% of HCWs who wore gloves did so (an 86% difference).Conclusion.HCWs were nearly as likely to have contaminated their hands or gloves after touching the environment in a room occupied by a patient colonized by VRE as after touching the colonized patient and the patient's environment. Gloves were highly protective with respect to hand contamination.


2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 583-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham M. Snyder ◽  
Kerri A. Thorn ◽  
Jon P. Furuno ◽  
Eli N. Perencevich ◽  
Mary-Claire Roghmann ◽  
...  

Objective.To assess the rate of and the risk factors for the detection of methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) on the protective gowns and gloves of healthcare workers (HCWs).Methods.We observed the interactions between HCWs and patients during routine clinical activities in a 29-bed medical intensive care unit at the University of Maryland Medical Center, an urban tertiary care academic hospital. Samples for culture were obtained from HCWs' hands prior to their entering a patient's room, from HCWs' disposable gowns and gloves after they completed patient care activities, and from HCWs' hands immediately after they removed their protective gowns and gloves.Results.Of 137 HCWs caring for patients colonized or infected with MRSA and/or VRE, 24 (17.5%; 95% confidence interval, 11.6%–24.4%) acquired the organism on their gloves, gown, or both. HCW contact with the endotracheal tube or tracheostomy site of a patient (P< .05), HCW contact with the head and/or neck of a patient (P< .05), and HCW presence in the room of a patient with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and/or jejunostomy tube (P< .05) were associated with an increased risk of acquiring these organisms.Conclusions.The gloves and gowns of HCWs frequently become contaminated with MRSA and VRE during the routine care of patients, and particularly during care of the patient's respiratory tract and any associated indwelling devices. As part of a larger infection control strategy, including high-compliance hand disinfection, they likely provide a useful barrier to transmitting antibiotic-resistant organisms among patients in an inpatient setting.



2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hend Hanna ◽  
Jan Umphrey ◽  
Jeffrey Tarrand ◽  
Michelle Mendoza ◽  
Issam Raad

AbstractBetween November 1996 and February 1997, 17 episodes of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infection or colonization (9 infections, 8 colonizations), all with the same or a similar genomic DNA pattern, were identified in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) of a tertiary-care cancer hospital. The cases were genotypically traced to a patient who was admitted to the hospital in September 1996 and who, by December 1996, had four different admissions to the MICU. Multifaceted infection control measures, including decontamination of the environment and of nondisposable equipment, halted the nosocomial transmission of VRE in the MICU.



2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deverick J. Anderson ◽  
Maria F. Gergen ◽  
Emily Smathers ◽  
Daniel J. Sexton ◽  
Luke F. Chen ◽  
...  

Objective.To determine the effectiveness of an automated ultraviolet-C (UV-C) emitter against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE),Clostridium difficile, andAcinetobacterspp. in patient rooms.Design.Prospective cohort study.Setting.Two tertiary care hospitals.Participants.Convenience sample of 39 patient rooms from which a patient infected or colonized with 1 of the 3 targeted pathogens had been discharged.Intervention.Environmental sites were cultured before and after use of an automated UV-C-emitting device in targeted rooms but before standard terminal room disinfection by environmental services.Results.In total, 142 samples were obtained from 27 rooms of patients who were colonized or infected with VRE, 77 samples were obtained from 10 rooms of patients withC. difficileinfection, and 10 samples were obtained from 2 rooms of patients with infections due toAcinetobacter. Use of an automated UV-C-emitting device led to a significant decrease in the total number of colony-forming units (CFUs) of any type of organism (1.07 log10reduction;P< .0001), CFUs of target pathogens (1.35 log10reduction;P< .0001), VRE CFUs (1.68 log10reduction;P< .0001), and C.difficileCFUs (1.16 log10reduction;P< .0001). CFUs ofAcinetobacteralso decreased (1.71 log10reduction), but the trend was not statistically significantP= .25). CFUs were reduced at all 9 of the environmental sites tested. Reductions similarly occurred in direct and indirect line of sight.Conclusions.Our data confirm that automated UV-C-emitting devices can decrease the bioburden of important pathogens in real-world settings such as hospital rooms.



2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 466-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gardiner ◽  
Sheila Murphey ◽  
Elizabeth Ossman ◽  
Donald Jungkind

AbstractPatients admitted to a medical intensive care unit during 21 days had rectal and urine samples cultured for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The prevalence rate was 55.3%. Only enteral feedings were associated with acquisition of VRE. One-quarter of VRE transmission resulted from acquisition in the study unit, 35% arrived from other units, and 15% from other hospital.



2005 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. A80
Author(s):  
Cesar Alaniz ◽  
Jennifer L Arndt ◽  
Lucinda M Brach ◽  
Maryann Adamczyk ◽  
Donna L McClish ◽  
...  


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 818-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Y. Popiel ◽  
Mark A. Miller

ObjectiveTo determine whether relaxing vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) precautions results in an increase in the incidence of invasive VRE infections over time.DesignRetrospective analysis of a microbiology database before and after relaxation of VRE screening and isolation precautions.SettingUrban tertiary care teaching hospital in Montreal, Canada.Participants.All hospitalized and emergency room patients over a 13-year period from January 1, 2000, to March 31, 2013.MethodsWe assessed the results of all microbiology cultures for the presence of VRE as well as the results of all polymerase chain reaction assays forvanAandvanBduring the study period. Applying criteria for 4 clinical situations (bacteremia, definite infection, possible infection, and colonization with VRE), we analyzed the effects of relaxed VRE screening and isolation precautions on the incidence of each of these outcomes over the time preceding and following this change.ResultsWhen VRE screening and isolation precautions were relaxed, a marked rise in VRE colonization was observed, with a lesser but definite rise in the 3 other outcomes. Despite this initial rise in all measures, all incidences other than colonization plateaued during the 34 months of follow-up.ConclusionsRelaxation of VRE screening and isolation precautions was associated with an immediate increase in colonization and infection incidence. Despite increasing colonization, infection outcomes remained infrequent and stable, suggesting a finite number of susceptible hosts at risk. Relaxation of VRE protocols may not lead to increasing infection incidence in a hospital setting, advocating that cost effectiveness exercises, with targeted screening and isolation precautions, are crucial.



2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Baran ◽  
Jambunathan Ramanathan ◽  
Kathleen M. Riederer ◽  
Riad Khatib

AbstractObjective:To determine the prevalence of stool colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) among healthcare workers (HCWs) and their families.Design:Prospective assessment of fecal colonization with VRE.Setting:A 603-bed, tertiary-care teaching hospital.Participants:Healthy volunteers recruited from hospital employees and their households were screened to exclude pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive disorders, and recent use of antimicrobials.Intervention:Self-obtained stool swabs were used to obtain cultures. Isolated enterococci were screened for vancomycin resistance and species were identified. Intra-household isolates were genotyped using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).Results:The participants (n = 228; age range, 28 days to 80 years) were from 137 households with and 91 without employees who had contact with patients.Enterococcusspecies were isolated from 127 stool specimens (55.7%). VRE were detected in 12 individuals, representing 6E. casseliflavus, 5E. faecium, and 1E. gallinarum. VRE were more commonly isolated in employees who had contact with patients (5 of 52 vs 0 of 40; relative risk [RR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.5 to 2.2;P= .07) and their household members (10 of 137 vs 2 of 91; RR, 3.3; CI95, 0.7 to 14.8;P= .13). In 2 households (2 adults in a physician's household and an adult plus a child in a nurse's household) PFGE analysis demonstrated identical intra-household strains of vancomycin-resistantE. faecium.Conclusions:VRE colonization was found in 5.3% of screened stools and was more prevalent in HCWs who had contact with patients and their households. Identical PFGE patterns between 2 employees who had contact with patients and their household members demonstrated probable intra-household spread. Although the mode of acquisition was uncertain, the association with employees who had contact with patients suggests possible occupational sources. These findings demonstrate the spread of VRE within the household and implicate occupational risk for its acquisition.



2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. S142
Author(s):  
Min-hui Lien ◽  
Han-yueh Kuo ◽  
Hui-ching Liang ◽  
Mei-laun Huang ◽  
Yu-chun Liu ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document