Comparative Analysis of 75th Percentile Durations for Neurosurgical Procedures in France and in US National Noscomial Infection Surveillance System Data

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Lietard ◽  
Véronique Thébaud ◽  
Géraldine Burnichon ◽  
Gérard Besson ◽  
Benoist Lejeune
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Neurosurgical Procedures ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
Neurosurgical Patients ◽  
The Us ◽  
System Risk ◽  
System Data ◽  
Risk Index Score

The duration of surgical procedures and the 75th percentiles of those durations are considered in calculation of the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) system risk index score. To compare the durations of neurosurgical procedures in a hospital in western France with the durations in the NNIS data, 6,136 neurosurgical patients were followed up to determine surgical site infection rates. The surgical site infection rate was 1.9%, and the 75th percentile durations were lower than those in the NNIS data. The values from the NNIS data are thus inadequate for this neurosurgical center.

Surveillance for Surgical Site Infection (SSI) After Neurosurgery: Influence of the US or Brest (France) National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Risk Index on SSI Rates

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1084-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Lietard ◽  
Véronique Thébaud ◽  
Gérard Besson ◽  
Benoist Lejeune
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Surveillance Data ◽  
National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Local Operation ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
Neurosurgical Patients ◽  
The Us

A total of 5,628 neurosurgical patients were observed in France to assess the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI). Their risk of SSI was defined by calculating both the US National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance and the Brest National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk indexes. This study compares SSI rates stratified according to either the US or Brest (France) National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance risk index. The SSI rates were correlated with National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance data involving only local operation durations.

scholarly journals Surgical site infection in patients submitted to orthopedic surgery: the NNIS risk index and risk prediction

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávia Falci Ercole ◽  
Tânia Couto Machado Chianca ◽  
Denise Duarte ◽  
Carlos Ernesto Ferreira Starling ◽  
Mariângela Carneiro
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Alternative Index

The applicability of the risk index for surgical site infection of the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) has been evaluated for its performance in different surgeries. In some procedures, it is necessary to include other variables to predict. Objective: to evaluate the applicability of the NNIS index for prediction of surgical site infection in orthopedic surgeries and to propose an alternative index. The study involved a historical cohort of 8236 patients who had been submitted to orthopaedic surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression to fit the model. The incidence of infection was 1.41%. Prediction models were evaluated and compared to the NNIS index. The proposed model was not considered a good predictor of infection, despite moderately stratified orthopedic surgical patients in at least three of the four scores. The alternative model scored higher than the NNIS models in the prediction of infection.

Finding a Method for Optimizing Risk Adjustment When Comparing Surgical-Site Infection Rates

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Brandt ◽  
Sonja Hansen ◽  
Dorit Sohr ◽  
Franz Daschner ◽  
Henning Rüden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
System Risk

AbstractObjective:To investigate whether stratification of the risk of developing a surgical-site infection (SSI) is improved when a logistic regression model is used to weight the risk factors for each procedure category individually instead of the modified NNIS System risk index.Design and Setting:The German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System, based on NNIS System methodology, has 273 acute care surgical departments participating voluntarily. Data on 9 procedure categories were included (214,271 operations).Methods:For each of the procedure categories, the significant risk factors from the available data (NNIS System risk index variables of ASA score, wound class, duration of operation, and endoscope use, as well as gender and age) were identified by multiple logistic regression analyses with stepwise variable selection. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve resulting from these analyses was used to evaluate the predictive power of logistic regression models.Results:For most procedures, at least two of the three variables contributing to the NNIS System risk index were shown to be independent risk factors (appendectomy, knee arthroscopy, cholecystectomy, colon surgery, herniorrhaphy, hip prosthesis, knee prosthesis, and vascular surgery). The predictive power of logistic regression models (including age and gender, when appropriate) was low (between 0.55 and 0.71) and for most procedures only slightly better than that of the NNIS System risk index.Conclusion:Without the inclusion of additional procedure-specific variables, logistic regression models do not improve the comparison of SSI rates from various hospitals.

scholarly journals Surgical site infections in adults patients undergoing of clean and contaminated surgeries at a university Brazilian hospital

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria de Lourdes Gonçalves Santos ◽  
Renata Rezende Teixeira ◽  
Augusto Diogo-Filho
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Global Index ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Infection Surveillance

CONTEXT: Surgical site infections are a risk inherent to surgical procedures, especially after digestive surgeries. They occur up to 30 days after surgery, or up to a year later if a prosthesis is implanted. The Surgical-site Infection Risk Index (SIRI), NISS (National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance) methodology, is a method to evaluate the risk of surgical site infections, which takes into account the potential contamination of the surgery, the patient's health status and surgery duration. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation between the surgical-site infection risk index score on the 1st day postoperatively, and the development of surgical site infection up to 30 days postoperatively. METHODS: The postoperative surgical site infections (NNIS) was evaluated by following-up in hospital and as an outpatient. The patients followed prospectively were those submitted to elective surgeries, clean (hernioplasties) or contaminated (colorretal), performed by conventional approach at a university hospital, during the period from June 2007 to August 2008. The mean age of the patients was 55.5 years, 133 (65.5%) male; 120 (59.1%) submitted to clean surgeries and 83 (40.9%) contaminated. RESULTS: The global index of surgical site infections was 10.3%; 10 (8.3%) in clean procedures and 111(3.2%) in contaminated ones. Four (19.1%) of the surgical site infections were diagnosed at the time of hospitalization and 17 (80.9%) at post-discharge follow-up. Twelve (57.1%) of the surgical site infections were superficial, 2 (9.5%) deep and 7 (33.3%) at a specific site. Of these, 5 (6.6%) were in patients classified as SIRI 0 (76); 9 (15%) for SIRI 1 (60); 5 (9.1%) for SIRI 2 (55) and 2 (16.7%) for SIRI 3. CONCLUSION: The global index of surgical site infections and its incidence among contaminated procedures are within the expected limits. On the other hand according to SIRI, the surgical site infection indexes are above the expected standards both for the clean and for the contaminated procedures.

Validation of a Modified Version of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Risk Index for Health Services Research

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Daneman ◽  
Andrew E. Simor ◽  
Donald A. Redelmeier
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Surveillance System ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Services Research ◽  
System Risk

Objective.To validate the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system risk index through administrative data to predict surgical site infections.Design.Retrospective cohort study.Setting.Population-based analysis in Ontario, Canada.Patients.All elderly patients who underwent elective surgery from April 1, 1992, through March 31, 2006 (n = 469,349).Methods.Data on procedural and patient outcomes were gathered from linked population-wide hospital discharge records and physician claims. The 75th percentile of surgical duration was estimated through anesthesiologist billing fees recorded in 15-minute increments; the American Society of Anesthesiology score of at least 3 out of 5 was estimated by diagnostic codes for severe systemic illness; and all surgeries were classified as clean or clean-contaminated because of their elective nature (thus, the maximum score on the modified index was 2).Results.A total of 147,216 surgeries (31%) had a score of 0;246,592 (53%) had a score of 1; and 75,541 (16%) had a score of 2 on the modified index. The 30-day risk of surgical site infection increased with each increment in the modified index (score of 0, 5.4%; score of 1, 8.0%; score of 2, 14.3%; P < .001). The association was evident for surgical site infection diagnosed during the index admission (score of 0, 2.0%; score of 1, 3.7%; score of 2, 8.9%; P < .001), as well as that associated with reoperation or death (score of 0, 0.04%; score of 1, 0.23%; score of 2, 0.73%; P < .001). The modified index predicted increases in surgical site infection risk within each of 11 surgical subgroups. In accord with past research, the modified index had modest discrimination (C statistic, 0.59), and the majority of surgical site infections (72%) occurred within lower risk strata.Conclusions.The modified index predicts surgical site infection in population-based analyses and is associated with incremental increases in risk.

Surgical-Site Infection After Cardiac Surgery: Incidence, Microbiology, and risk Factors

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Didier Lepelletier ◽  
Stéphanie Perron ◽  
Philippe Bizouarn ◽  
Jocelyne Caillon ◽  
Henri Drugeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Internal Mammary ◽  
System Risk

AbstractObjective:To identify risk factors associated with surgical-site infection according to the depth of infection, the cardiac procedure, and the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System risk index.Design:Prospective survey conducted during a 12-month period.Setting:A 48-bed cardiac surgical department in a teaching hospital.Patients:Patients admitted for cardiac surgery between February 2002 and January 2003.Results:Surgical-site infections were diagnosed in 3% of the patients (38 of 1,268). Of the 38 surgical-site infections, 20 were superficial incisional infections and 18 were mediastinitis for incidence rates of 1.6% and 1.4%, respectively. Cultures were positive in 28 cases and the most commonly isolated pathogen wasStaphylococcus. A National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System risk index score of 2 or greater was associated with a risk of surgical-site infection (relative risk, 2.4;P< .004). Heart transplantation, mechanical circulatory assistance, coronary artery bypass graft with the use of internal mammary artery, and reoperation for cardiac tamponade or pericard effusion were independent risk factors associated with surgical-site infection.Conclusions:Data surveillance using incidence rates stratified by cardiac procedure and type of infection is relevant to improving infection control efforts. Risk factors in patients who developed superficial infection were different from those in patients who developed mediastinitis. Coronary artery bypass graft using internal mammary artery was associated with a high risk of surgical-site infection, and independent factors such as reoperation for cardiac tamponade or pericard effusion increased the risk of infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document