ControllingLegionellain Hospital Drinking Water: An Evidence-Based Review of Disinfection Methods

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusen E. Lin ◽  
Janet E. Stout ◽  
Victor L. Yu

Hospital-acquired Legionnaires' disease is directly linked to the presence ofLegionellain hospital drinking water. Disinfecting the drinking water system is an effective preventive measure. The efficacy of any disinfection measures should be validated in a stepwise fashion from laboratory assessment to a controlled multiple-hospital evaluation over a prolonged period of time. In this review, we evaluate systemic disinfection methods (copper-silver ionization, chlorine dioxide, monochloramine, ultraviolet light, and hyperchlorination), a focal disinfection method (point-of-use filtration), and short-term disinfection methods in outbreak situations (superheat-and-flush with or without hyperchlorination). The infection control practitioner should take the lead in selection of the disinfection system and the vendor. Formal appraisals by other hospitals with experience of the system under consideration is indicated. Routine performance of surveillance cultures of drinking water to detectLegionellaand monitoring of disinfectant concentrations are necessary to ensure long-term efficacy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1855-1868
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Gora ◽  
Tim Anaviapik Soucie ◽  
Nicole E. McCormick ◽  
C. Carolina Ontiveros ◽  
Vincent L'Hérault ◽  
...  

Drinking water samples were collected from the water source, water delivery truck, domestic water storage tanks, and at the point of use in a decentralized drinking water system in Pond Inlet, Nunavut, a predominantly Inuit community in Canada's Arctic region.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 2192-2201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Gora ◽  
Benjamin F. Trueman ◽  
Tim Anaviapik-Soucie ◽  
Megan K. Gavin ◽  
C. Carolina Ontiveros ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ljiljana Zlatanović ◽  
Aleksandra Knezev ◽  
Jan van der Hoek ◽  
Jan Vreeburg

2015 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 972-979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qihua Wu ◽  
Honglan Shi ◽  
Yinfa Ma ◽  
Craig Adams ◽  
Hua Jiang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 998-1008
Author(s):  
Wendy Pons ◽  
Ian Young ◽  
David Pearl ◽  
Andria Jones-Bitton ◽  
Scott A. McEwen ◽  
...  

The objectives of this work were to investigate the relationships between characteristics of small non-community drinking water systems (SDWSs) and the performance of these systems with respect to Escherichia coli testing and risk ratings. Ontario-wide SDWS data were analysed using regression models with outcomes of (1) having an adverse E. coli test result in the 12 months prior to the last inspection and (2) the SDWS risk rating (high/medium vs. low risk) that is assigned by public health inspectors. Almost 34% (2,364/7,003) of SDWSs did not utilize treatment, more commonly for ground water than surface supplies (P < 0.001). The odds of having a positive E. coli test result were greater in systems using ground water with treatment (OR = 2.00; 95% CI 1.23–3.24) and surface water with treatment (OR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.05–3.71) compared to ground water with no treatment. The odds of having a water system rated high or medium compared to low risk was greater if the water system operated seasonally (OR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.17–1.59), had an adverse E. coli test result (OR = 1.66; 95% CI 1.09–2.53), and in specific facility types. This research helps to inform existing training opportunities available to SDWS operators in Ontario, and to better standardize the SDWS risk assessment process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document