scholarly journals Effects of strain paths on the fracture forming limit of high strength structural steel sheets

2020 ◽  
Vol 1605 ◽  
pp. 012078
Author(s):  
Teng Xu ◽  
Qin-xiang Xia ◽  
Zhen-jie Qi ◽  
Xiao-yu Wu ◽  
Jia-qi Ran ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 751 ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sansot Panich ◽  
Nopparat Seemuang ◽  
Taratip Chaimongkon

In this work, the experimental and numerical analyses of Forming Limit Curve (FLC) and Forming Limit Stress Curve (FLSC) for Advanced High Strength Steel (AHSS) sheet, grade JAC780Y, are performed. Initially, the FLC is experimentally determined by means of the Nakazima Stretch forming test. Subsequently, the FLSC of investigated steel was plastically calculated using the experimental FLC data. Different yield criteria including Hill48, and Yld89, are applied to describe plastic flow behavior of the AHS steel and Swift hardening law is taken into account. Hereby, influences of the constitutive yield models on the numerically determined FLSCs are evaluated regarding to those results from the experimental data. The obtained stress based forming limits are affected significantly by the yield criteria. Finally, the experimental and numerical formability analyses of Fukui stretch-drawing and square cup drawing tests are studied through FLC and FLSCs. It is observed that all stress based curves can be used very well to describe material formability of the examined steel compared to the strain based FLC. The strain based FLC depend on forming history and strain paths change. In the other hand, the stress based FLC do not depend on these issue. In this study, it can be concluded that the FLSCs could predict failure more realistically and better than the strain based FLC.


2007 ◽  
Vol 344 ◽  
pp. 113-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Tolazzi ◽  
Marion Merklein

This paper presents a method for the experimental determination of forming limit diagrams under non linear strain paths. The method consists in pre-forming the sheets under two different strain conditions: uniaxial and biaxial, and then stretching the samples, cut out of the preformed sheets, using a Nakajima testing setup. The optical deformation measurement system used for the process analysis (ARAMIS, Company GOM) allows to record and to analyze the strain distribution very precisely with respect to both time and space. As a reference also the FLDs of the investigated grades (the deep drawing steel DC04, the dual phase steel DP450 and the aluminum alloy AA5754) in as-received conditions were determined. The results show as expected an influence of the pre-forming conditions on the forming limit of the materials, with an increased formability in the case of biaxial stretching after uniaxial pre-forming and a reduced formability for uniaxial load after biaxial stretching if compared to the case of linear strain paths. These effects can be observed for all the investigated materials and can be also described in terms of a shifting of the FLD, which is related to the art and magnitude of the pre-deformation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 89-91 ◽  
pp. 214-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gutiérrez ◽  
A. Lara ◽  
Daniel Casellas ◽  
Jose Manuel Prado

The Forming Limit Diagrams (FLD) are widely used in the formability analysis of sheet metal to determine the maximum strain, which gives the Forming Limit Curve (FLC). It is well known that these curves depend on the strain path during forming and hence on the test method used to calculate them. In this paper, different stretching tests such as the Nakajima and the Marciniak tests were performed, with different sample geometries to obtain points in different areas of the FLD. An optical analysis system was used, which allows following the strain path during the test. The increasing use of advanced high-strength steels (AHSS) has created an interest in determining the mechanical properties of these materials. In this work, FLCs for a TRIP steel were determined using Nakajima and Marciniak tests, which revealed different strain paths depending on the type of test. Determination of the FLCs was carried out following the mathematical calculations indicated in the ISO 12004 standard and was also compared with an alternative mathematical method, which showed different FLCs. Finally, the tests were verified by comparing the strain paths of the Nakajima and Marciniak tests with a well-known mild steel.


2014 ◽  
Vol 939 ◽  
pp. 260-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryutaro Hino ◽  
Satoki Yasuhara ◽  
Yutaka Fujii ◽  
Atsushi Hirahara ◽  
Fusahito Yoshida

Forming limits of several high-strength steel (HSS) sheets under non-proportional deformation paths were examined experimentally and predicted analytically. Forming limit curves (FLCs) for 590MPa, 780MPa and 980MPa grade HSS sheets were obtained by performing stretch forming tests under proportional deformation and two types of non-proportional deformation. The experimental results showed strong path-dependent characteristics of FLCs of HSS sheets. Forming limits of equi-biaxially prestrained HSS sheets became markedly lower compared to the original FLCs under proportional deformation, while forming limits of uniaxially prestrained HSS sheets became partially higher than the original FLCs. It was confirmed that Marciniak-Kuczyński type analysis gave reasonably good predictions of forming limits under non-proportional deformation paths. Especially forming limit predictions of equi-biaxially-prestrained sheets showed good agreement with the corresponding experimental results.


2012 ◽  
Vol 504-506 ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Christian Hezler ◽  
Marion Merklein ◽  
Joachim Hecht ◽  
Bernd Griesbach

The evaluation of forming simulation by using the forming limit curve has only limited validity if it is applied on car body components with non-linear strain paths. If modern high strength materials are used, the forming limit criteria can also provide invalid predictions. Especially high strength multiphase steels show a specific behaviour in forming, necking and crack initiation. If bending loads are applied to these materials, the onset of cracking occurs partially not within the range of the forming limit curve (FLC). The stress limit indicates the failure beginning more accurate. It is independent of the forming history and should be less sensitive to the behaviour of high strength steels. In the post processing of a simulation it could be used similar to the forming limit. A limit curve applied on the in-plane-stress-diagram of an analysed component defines areas that are more vulnerable for cracking. The required stress limit curve will be obtained in this research by applying a stretch-bending-test. It is selected in order to reach loads, which are comparable to the forming process in the components’ production. The forming state that is affecting the specimen is a combination of bending and stretching load. Different load conditions can be applied at the test by altering the stamp-radius and the specimen geometry. Since stresses cannot be measured directly in the experiment, the test is modelled in the simulation where the stresses can be calculated for a given material model. Finally the stress limit criterion was applied on the test parts’ stress distribution diagram. Occurring stresses above the stress limit curve are displayed on the simulation. Thereby it is possible to show a good correlation in critical areas between the failure prediction in the simulation and occurring rupture on the test component.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document