scholarly journals Accountant’s Perception on Fraud Detection in Financial Statement Reporting Using Fraud Triangle Analysis

Author(s):  
Indarti ◽  
Inova Fitri Siregara
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 7054-7058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Parlindungan ◽  
Fernando Africano ◽  
P. Sri Megawati Elizabeth

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-358
Author(s):  
Putri Intan Prastiwi ◽  
. Payamta

This study aims to identify methods in the detection of fraud in financial statements conducted by researchers in Indonesia. This research has been published on the website of the Ministry of Research and Technology with the SINTA 1 and SINTA 2 indexes. This research was conducted with a literature study on financial statement fraud in Indonesia. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative method by taking data from literacy studies on the research of fraud detection methods in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the fraud detection method used in financial reports in Indonesia is using the fraud Triangle method. The article of these studies is expected to provide input, insight, and information to all parties such as company management, auditors, and users of financial statements about various methods of detecting financial statement fraud in Indonesia.


Author(s):  
Nguyen Tien Hung ◽  
Huynh Van Sau

The study was conducted to identify fraudulent financial statements at listed companies (DNNY) on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange (HOSE) through the Triangular Fraud Platform This is a test of VSA 240. At the same time, the conformity assessment of this model in the Vietnamese market. The results show that the model is based on two factors: the ratio of sales to total assets and return on assets; an Opportunity Factor (Education Level); and two factors Attitude (change of independent auditors and opinion of independent auditors). This model is capable of accurately forecasting more than 78% of surveyed sample businesses and nearly 72% forecasts for non-research firms.  Keywords Triangle fraud, financial fraud report, VSA 240 References Nguyễn Tiến Hùng & Võ Hồng Đức (2017), “Nhận diện gian lận báo cáo tài chính: Bằng chứng thực nghiệm tại các doanh nghiệp niêm yết ở Việt Nam”, Tạp chí Công Nghệ Ngân Hàng, số 132 (5), tr. 58-72.[2]. Hà Thị Thúy Vân (2016), “Thủ thuật gian lận trong lập báo cáo tài chính của các công ty niêm yết”, Tạp chí tài chính, kỳ 1, tháng 4/2016 (630). [3]. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement. New York, NY, US: Free Press.[4]. Bộ Tài Chính Việt Nam, (2012). Chuẩn mực kiểm toán Việt Nam số 240 – Trách nhiệm của kiểm toán viên đối với gian lận trong kiểm toán báo cáo tài chính. [5]. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.[6]. Võ Hồng Đức & Phan Bùi Gia Thủy (2014), Quản trị công ty: Lý thuyết và cơ chế kiểm soát, Ấn bản lần 1, Tp.HCM, Nxb Thanh Niên.[7]. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance 26 (11): 55-67.[9]. Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Available at SSRN 1295494.[10]. Lou, Y. I., & Wang, M. L. (2011). Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business and Economics Research (JBER), 7(2).[11]. Perols, J. L., & Lougee, B. A. (2011). The relation between earnings management and financial statement fraud. Advances in Accounting, 27(1), 39-53.[12]. Trần Thị Giang Tân, Nguyễn Trí Tri, Đinh Ngọc Tú, Hoàng Trọng Hiệp và Nguyễn Đinh Hoàng Uyên (2014), “Đánh giá rủi ro gian lận báo cáo tài chính của các công ty niêm yết tại Việt Nam”, Tạp chí Phát triển kinh tế, số 26 (1) tr.74-94.[13]. Kirkos, E., Spathis, C., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Data mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 995-1003.[14]. Amara, I., Amar, A. B., & Jarboui, A. (2013). Detection of Fraud in Financial Statements: French Companies as a Case Study. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 3(3), 40-51.[15]. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 443-465.[16]. Beneish, M. D. (1999). The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 24-36.[17]. Persons, O. S. (1995). Using financial statement data to identify factors associated with fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 11(3), 38-46.[18]. Summers, S. L., & Sweeney, J. T. (1998). Fraudulently misstated financial statements and insider trading: An empirical analysis. Accounting Review, 131-146.[19]. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary accounting research, 13(1), 1-36.[20]. Loebbecke, J. K., Eining, M. M., & Willingham, J. J. (1989). Auditors experience with material irregularities – Frequency, nature, and detectability. Auditing – A journal of practice and Theory, 9(1), 1-28. [21]. Abbott, L. J., Park, Y., & Parker, S. (2000). The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance, 26(11), 55-68.[22]. Farber, D. B. (2005). Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter?. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 539-561.[23]. Stice, J. D. (1991). Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. Accounting Review, 516-533.[24]. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., & Hermanson, D. R. (1999). COSO's new fraud study: What it means for CPAs. Journal of Accountancy, 187(5), 12.[25]. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied statistical models.Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Burr Ridge, IL.[26]. Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.[27]. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualita-tive Choice Behavior," in Frontiers in Econometrics, P. Zarenm-bka, ed. New York: Academic Press, 105-42.(1989). A Method of Simulated Moments for Estimation of Discrete Response Models Without Numerical Integration," Econometrica, 54(3), 1027-1058.[28]. DA Cohen, ADey, TZ Lys. (2008), “Accrual-Based Earnings Management in the Pre-and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Periods”. The accounting review.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-44
Author(s):  
Mariati ◽  
Emmy Indrayani

Company’s financial condition reflected in the financial statements. However, there are many loopholes in the financial statements which can become a chance for the management and certain parties to commit fraud on the financial statements. This study aims to detect financial statement fraud as measured using fraud score model that occurred in issuers entered into the LQ-45 index in 2014-2016 with the use of six independent variables are financial stability, external pressure, financial target, nature of industry, ineffective monitoring and rationalization. This study using 27 emiten of LQ-45 index during 2014-2016. However, there are some data outlier that shall be removed, thus sample results obtained 66 data from 25 companies. Multiple linear regression analysis were used in this study. The results showed that the financial stability variables (SATA), nature of industry (RECEIVBLE), ineffective monitoring (IND) and rationalization (ITRENDLB) proved to be influential or have the capability to detect financial statement fraud. While the external pressure variables (DER) and financial target (ROA) are not able to detect the existence of financial statement fraud. Simultaneously all variables in this study were able to detect significantly financial statement fraud.


Equity ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-62
Author(s):  
Muhammad Balia Fahreza ◽  
Yoyoh Guritno ◽  
Noegrahini Lastiningsih

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeteksi kecuragan laporan keuangan berdasarkan analisis fraud triangle. Menurut teori Cressey, terdapat tiga kondisi yang selalu hadir dalam tindakan fraud yaitu pressure, opportunity, dan rationalization yang disebut sebagai fraud triangle. Berdasarkan teori fraud triangle Cressey, peneliti mengembangkan variabel yang dapat digunakan dalam mendeteksi fraud, yaitu rasio likuiditas, rasio leverage, dan ukuran perusahaan. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh perusahaan pertambangan yang terdaftar pada tahun 2014-2017 di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Perusahaan yang diambil dan dijadikan sampel adalah 35 perusahaan dan jumlah observasi yang dilakukan selama tahun 2014-2017 adalah 140 item observasi. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis regresi logistik dengan software SPSS 25.0. Hasil pengujian statistik menunjukkan bahwa secara empiris variabel rasio likuiditas berpengaruh signifikan terhadap fraudulent financial statement dan rasio leverage dan ukuran perusahaan tidak berpengaruh signifikan


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-138
Author(s):  
Faiz Rahman Siddiq ◽  
Agus Endrianto Suseno

Financial statement fraud biasa disebut dengan kecurangan laporan keuangan yang merupakan kesengajaan dalam melakukan kelalaian dan kesalahan ketika  membuat laporan keuangan dengan penyajian yang tidak sesuai pada prinsip akuntansi berterima umum. Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No.99 menjelaskan tentang salah saji yang berhubungan dengan auditor dalam mengaudit laporan keuangan terhadap fraud diantaranya adalah (1) salah saji dari kesalahan suatu laporan keuangan merupakan suatu  pengungkapan yang direncanakan guna menipu pengguna laporan keuangan, (2) penyalahgunaan aset atau istilah lain pencurian dan penggelapan sering dijadikan sebagai salah saji dalam laporan keuangan. Fraud pentagon theory merupakan pengembangan dari teori fraud sebelumnya yaitu fraud triangle (Cressey, 1953) dan fraud diamond (Wolf and Hermanson,2004). Populasi penelitian ini adalah perusahaan yang tergabung dalam Indeks JII (Jakarta Islamic Index) pada tahun 2014-2017. Teknik pengambilan sampel dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Metode analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis regresi linear berganda. Financial statement fraud dalam penelitian menggunakan perspektif F-Score Model. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pressure (Financial Stability, dan Financial Target), dan Opportunity (Nature of Industry) berpengaruh terhadap financial statement fraud. Sedangkan Pressure (External Pressure dan Personal Financial  Need), Rationalization (Change in Auditor), Competence (Change of Director) dan Arrogance (Frequent Number of CEO’s Picture dan Dualism Position) tidak berpengaruh terhadap financial statemnt fraud.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Langgeng Prayitno Utomo

This study aims to examine the factors that affect the fraudulent financial statements of the company. Fraud detection of financial statements using fraud triangle theory. Based on the theory of fraud triangle there are three factors: pressure, opportunity, and rationalization are used as parameters to detect fraud. The sample of this study used 44 companies in 3 years of observation, where the company is divided into companies that are indications of fraud and not by doing the analysis using the calculation of the underlying M-score, this study used logistic regression, the result that the indication of fraud in this study only can be obtained from external pressure factors on pressure variables and the effectiveness of monitoring on the opportunity variables, this study fails to establish influence in three factors at once ie pressure, opportunity, and rational


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shabrina Prasmaulida

Financial statements generally aim to provide information about the company’s financial position, performance, and cash flows to the interested parties. The motivation to gain trust from the users, especially investors, shareholders and creditors, leads someone to commit fraud in the financial reporting. This study aims to detect and predict financial statement fraud based on the perspective of fraud triangle adopted by SAS No. 99. The dependent variable in this study is financial statement fraud which is proxied by earnings management, while the independent variables in this study are financial stability pressure, personal financial need, ineffective monitoring, effective monitoring, external pressure, and financial targets.Population of this research is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2012 - 2014. Samples are selected using purposive sampling method and obtained 150 companies out of a total population of 162 companies. The results show that financial stability pressure and external pressurehave significant positive effect on financial statement fraud. Meanwhile, personal financial need, ineffective monitoring, effective monitoring, and financial targets do not have significant effect on financial statement fraud.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 713
Author(s):  
Yuliana Pertiwi Yuwono ◽  
Maria Assumpta Evi Marlina

This research aims to determine the effect of fraud triangle theory toward Financial statement fraud. Financial statement fraud is proxied by earnings management.  Population in this study is non-Islamic commercial banking companies listed on SGX, MYX, SET, PSE and IDX. The sampling technique used purposive sampling. The total sample in the study was 66 non-Islamic commercial banking companies. The data analysis method used is multiple linear regression. The research results proved that Financial targets and change of auditors had a positive effect on Financial statement fraud while external pressure had a negative effect on Financial statement fraud. Financial stability and ineffective monitoring had no effect on Financial statement fraud. This research can be used as a reference by investors, the public, government and users of other financial statement information in order to detect Financial statement fraud through the fraud triangle theory. Keywords: Financial statement fraud; Earnings Management; Fraud Triangle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document