scholarly journals Pattern of forest biomass recovery and biodiversity loss after reduced impact logging in East Kalimantan

2021 ◽  
Vol 724 (1) ◽  
pp. 012035
Author(s):  
F H Susanty
2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 162-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene Zamora-Cristales ◽  
John Sessions ◽  
Glen Murphy ◽  
Kevin Boston

2017 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 145-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Ghaffariyan ◽  
Mark Brown ◽  
Mauricio Acuna ◽  
John Sessions ◽  
Tom Gallagher ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoshi HIRATSUKA ◽  
Takeshi TOMA ◽  
Rita DIANA ◽  
Deddy HADRIYANTO ◽  
Yasushi MORIKAWA

2010 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Ralevic ◽  
M Ryans ◽  
D Cormier

Sustainability assessments and biomass inventories often neglect the operational challenges involved in the harvesting of forest biomass for bioenergy. Thus, concerns that increasing demands for biomass will lead to greater environmental impacts, particularly on soil productivity, need to be considered from an operations perspective that takes into consideration the technical and cost limitations to biomass recovery. We examine operational forest biomass recovery potential of harvest residue (slash) for three sites located north of Kapuskasing, Ontario. The sites are in the Northern Claybelt, which is in the boreal forest and is comprised primarily of lowland black spruce and upland mixedwoods. Supply flows of harvest residues estimated using the Biomass Opportunity Supply Model (BiOS), developed by FPInnovations – Feric Division are compared to validation data collected from the sites. Costs for the supply flows were also estimated using BiOS. After harvesting limitations and planned retentions (such as wildlife trees) were taken into consideration, 41% (41.2 ovendry tonnes/ha) and 59% (99.1 odt/ha) of total above-ground biomass were estimated to remain on site in two mixedwood blocks, and 25% (25.3 odt/ha) in a black spruce block. Thus, considerable biomass was left on the forest floor, contrary to popular perceptions that bioenergy harvesting will result in a “clearing” or potential “vacuuming” of the forest floor. The delivered cost was $53/odt ($2.86/GJ energy equivalent) and $58/odt ($3.14/GJ) for the two upland sites and $59/odt ($3.19/GJ) for the lowland black spruce site. This is higher than conventional hog fuel costs. Although operational and cost considerations thus limit harvest residue recovery, and although there are a number of operational factors that can minimize environmental impacts on soils and biodiversity, sustainable biomass removal guidelines still need to be implemented on sites sensitive to soil damage and nutrient removal. Key words: biomass, bioenergy, harvest, operations, cost, supply chain, sustainable management, soil nutrients, forest residues, BiOS model, Ontario


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Muhdi ◽  
Juang Rata Matangaran

The research was done at a natural tropical forest of PT Inhutani II, East Kalimantan. The objectivesof the research were to study the carbon (C) stock in the natural tropical forest after conventional andreduced impact logging (RIL) and to get the effectivity of RIL based on carbon stock, financial andenvironmental aspects. The effect of conventional and RIL on the environment and carbon stock in theplots was studied using the data of three plots with each size 100 m x 100 m. The plots are placedbased on purposive sampling at landing, main skid trail, and branch skid trails, respectively. Cstocks are counted by allometric equations and C economics by the economic acceptance of REDD.Economic value of RIL was IDR 1,604,518,900,- ha-1. Based on financial analysis showed that RILwas feasible and profitable at a rate of interest 16 %.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document