Hematological Markers as Predictors of Treatment Outcomes with Lu-177 DOTATATE in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

Author(s):  
Swayamjeet Satapathy ◽  
Anish Bhattacharya ◽  
Ashwani Sood ◽  
Rakesh Kapoor ◽  
Rajesh Gupta ◽  
...  
STEMedicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. e89
Author(s):  
Xinqiang Zhu ◽  
Gang Zhou ◽  
Linchun Wen ◽  
Jianing Liu ◽  
Xuetong Jiang ◽  
...  

Background: This retrospective study aimed to identify key factors affecting the rate of complete resection for non-metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) using both transanal local excision (TLE) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: Records in the past 10 years were retrieved, for a total of 95 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal NETs sized between 10-20 mm. Treatment outcomes were first compared between TLE and ESD to identify significantly associated factors. Monofactor analysis was then performed between complete and local resections to identify risk factors, which were then subjected to a multivariable analysis to identify independent risk factors. Results: Treatment outcomes between TLE and ESD were significantly associated with depth of invasion (P=0.039) and complete/local resection (P=0.048). By monofactor analysis between complete and local resections, depth of invasion, tumor size, tumor stage and endoscopic manifestation were identified to be risk factors (P=0.014, 0.003, 0.002 and 0.028, respectively). In subsequent multivariable analysis, depth of invasion and tumor size were independent risk factors, with odds ratio of 18.838 and 37.223, and 95% confidence interval of 1.242-285.800 and 2.839-488.078, respectively. Conclusion: Depth of invasion and tumor size were independent risk factors that significantly affect the complete resection rate of 10-20 mm non-metastatic rectal NETs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S918
Author(s):  
L. Apostolidis ◽  
S. Kreutzfeldt ◽  
E.C. Winkler ◽  
C. Kratochwil ◽  
Z. Kender

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 816-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxine D. Fisher ◽  
Sonia Pulgar ◽  
Matthew H. Kulke ◽  
Beloo Mirakhur ◽  
Paul J. Miller ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex J. Liu ◽  
Benjamin E. Ueberroth ◽  
Patrick W. McGarrah ◽  
Skye A. Buckner Petty ◽  
Ayse Tuba Kendi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4607-4607
Author(s):  
Leonidas Apostolidis ◽  
Arianna Dal Buono ◽  
Elettra Merola ◽  
Henning Jann ◽  
Dirk Jaeger ◽  
...  

4607 Background: Well differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) have been distinguished from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in the most current WHO classifications from 2017 and 2019. Retrospective data suggest that commonly applied first-line chemotherapy protocols with cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide (PE) are less effective in NET G3 than NEC. Therefore, current treatment guidelines suggest alternative first-line treatment protocols like temozolomide-based (TEM), streptozotocin-based (STZ) and FOLFOX which have only been studied in second-line so far. The aim of this multicenter analysis was to evaluate treatment outcomes for NET G3 with a focus on the efficacy of different first-line regimens. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis of all patients with NET G3 in the NEN databases of 3 German cancer centers. All histopathological findings were reviewed by the investigators in order to comply with the most current WHO classification. Results: A total of 131 patients could be identified. Median Ki67 was 30 %, primary tumors were located in the pancreas in 71 % of cases, 20 patients had a history of prior NET G1/G2 diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) was 138.1 months with a median follow-up of 20.4 months. 125 patients received palliative first-line therapy: PE n = 34, FOLFOX n = 36, TEM (mostly temozolomide+capecitabine) n = 21, STZ n = 19, other (including targeted agents, somatostatin analogues, PRRT and multimodal combination approaches) n = 15. Overall response (ORR) and disease control rate was 35.3 % and 67.6 % for PE, 52.8 % and 80.6 % for FOLFOX, 28.6 % and 66.7 % for TEM, 47.4 % and 68.4 % for STZ, 20.0 % and 73.3 % for other respectively. Median progression-free survival for PE was 5.2 months. Compared to PE, PFS in the other treatment groups was 6.0 months for FOLFOX (p = 0.164), 12.0 months for TEM (p = 0.059), 5.7 months for STZ (p = 0.519), 14.1 months for other (p = 0.003). All non-PE patients combined showed a significantly prolonged PFS vs. PE (9.0 vs. 5.2 months; p = 0.011). 89 patients received second-line systemic therapy with a median PFS of 5.3 months. Conclusions: In this first multicenter analysis of different treatment strategies for NET G3, patients receiving upfront treatment with non-PE regimens had a significantly prolonged PFS. Of the single defined protocols, FOLFOX showed the highest ORR, and TEM the longest PFS. Further prospective evaluation of the optimal therapeutic strategy for this newly defined tumor entity is needed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii471-viii472 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Apostolidis ◽  
D. Jäger ◽  
E.C. Winkler

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A561-A562
Author(s):  
T HEFFRON ◽  
G SMALLWOOD ◽  
M DEVERA ◽  
L DAVIS ◽  
E MARTINEZ ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document