Multicenter analysis of treatment outcomes for well differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4607-4607
Author(s):  
Leonidas Apostolidis ◽  
Arianna Dal Buono ◽  
Elettra Merola ◽  
Henning Jann ◽  
Dirk Jaeger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Multicenter Analysis ◽  
Net G3 ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3

4607 Background: Well differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) have been distinguished from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in the most current WHO classifications from 2017 and 2019. Retrospective data suggest that commonly applied first-line chemotherapy protocols with cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide (PE) are less effective in NET G3 than NEC. Therefore, current treatment guidelines suggest alternative first-line treatment protocols like temozolomide-based (TEM), streptozotocin-based (STZ) and FOLFOX which have only been studied in second-line so far. The aim of this multicenter analysis was to evaluate treatment outcomes for NET G3 with a focus on the efficacy of different first-line regimens. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis of all patients with NET G3 in the NEN databases of 3 German cancer centers. All histopathological findings were reviewed by the investigators in order to comply with the most current WHO classification. Results: A total of 131 patients could be identified. Median Ki67 was 30 %, primary tumors were located in the pancreas in 71 % of cases, 20 patients had a history of prior NET G1/G2 diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) was 138.1 months with a median follow-up of 20.4 months. 125 patients received palliative first-line therapy: PE n = 34, FOLFOX n = 36, TEM (mostly temozolomide+capecitabine) n = 21, STZ n = 19, other (including targeted agents, somatostatin analogues, PRRT and multimodal combination approaches) n = 15. Overall response (ORR) and disease control rate was 35.3 % and 67.6 % for PE, 52.8 % and 80.6 % for FOLFOX, 28.6 % and 66.7 % for TEM, 47.4 % and 68.4 % for STZ, 20.0 % and 73.3 % for other respectively. Median progression-free survival for PE was 5.2 months. Compared to PE, PFS in the other treatment groups was 6.0 months for FOLFOX (p = 0.164), 12.0 months for TEM (p = 0.059), 5.7 months for STZ (p = 0.519), 14.1 months for other (p = 0.003). All non-PE patients combined showed a significantly prolonged PFS vs. PE (9.0 vs. 5.2 months; p = 0.011). 89 patients received second-line systemic therapy with a median PFS of 5.3 months. Conclusions: In this first multicenter analysis of different treatment strategies for NET G3, patients receiving upfront treatment with non-PE regimens had a significantly prolonged PFS. Of the single defined protocols, FOLFOX showed the highest ORR, and TEM the longest PFS. Further prospective evaluation of the optimal therapeutic strategy for this newly defined tumor entity is needed.

scholarly journals Multicenter Analysis of Treatment Outcomes for Systemic Therapy in Well Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET G3)

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1936
Author(s):  
Leonidas Apostolidis ◽  
Arianna Dal Buono ◽  
Elettra Merola ◽  
Henning Jann ◽  
Dirk Jäger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Multicenter Analysis ◽  
Net G3 ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3

Well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) have been distinguished from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in the most current WHO classifications. Commonly applied first-line chemotherapy protocols with cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide (PE) are less effective in NET G3 than NEC. Suggested alternative treatment protocols have not been studied in first-line therapy of NET G3 so far. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with NET G3 in the databases of 3 German cancer centers. Out of 142 patients, 136 patients received palliative first-line therapy: overall response rate (ORR) was 35.1% for PE (n = 37), 56.4% for FOLFOX (n = 39), 27.3% for temozolomide/capecitabine (TEM/CAP) (n = 22), 45.0% for streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil (STZ/5-FU) (n = 20), and 16.7% for other (n = 18). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for PE was 6.9 months. Compared to PE, PFS in the other treatment groups was 6.9 months for FOLFOX (p = 0.333), 12.0 months for TEM/CAP (p = 0.093), 4.8 months for STZ/5-FU (p = 0.919), and 14.1 months for other (p = 0.014). In a univariate setting, all non-PE patients combined showed a significantly prolonged PFS vs. PE (9.0 months; p = 0.049) which could not be confirmed in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, NET G3 with FOLFOX showed the highest ORR, and with TEM/CAP showed the longest PFS. Further prospective evaluation of the optimal therapeutic strategy for this tumor entity is needed.

scholarly journals Treatment outcomes for well differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3)

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii471-viii472 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Apostolidis ◽  
D. Jäger ◽  
E.C. Winkler
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Net G3 ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3

scholarly journals 1169P First-line fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy in gastro-entero-pancreatic grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3)

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S776
Author(s):  
G. Lamberti ◽  
S. Pusceddu ◽  
T. Ibrahim ◽  
A. Bongiovanni ◽  
R. Berardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
First Line ◽  
Net G3 ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3

scholarly journals FAS and Subsequent Therapies in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane E. Rogers ◽  
Michael Lam ◽  
Daniel M. Halperin ◽  
Cecile G. Dagohoy ◽  
James C. Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

We evaluated outcomes of treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and streptozocin (FAS) in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and its impact on subsequent therapy (everolimus or temozolomide). Advanced PanNET patients treated at our center from 1992 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients received bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2), streptozocin (400 mg/m2) (both IV, days 1-5) and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 IV, day 1) every 28 days. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed using RECIST version 1.1. Of 243 eligible patients, 220 were evaluable for ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Most (90%) had metastatic, nonfunctional PanNETs; 14% had prior therapy. ORR to FAS was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-48%). Median follow-up was 61 months. Median PFS was 20 (95% CI: 15-23) months; median overall survival (OS) was 63 (95% CI: 60-71) months. Cox regression analyses suggested improvement with first-line vs subsequent lines of FAS therapy. Main adverse events ≥ grade 3 were neutropenia (10%) and nausea/vomiting (5.5%). Dose reductions were required in 32% of patients. Post-FAS everolimus (n=108; 68% second line) had a median PFS of 10 (95% CI: 8-14) months. Post-FAS temozolomide (n=60; 53% > fourth line) had an ORR of 13% and median PFS of 5.2 (95% CI: 4-12) months. In this largest reported cohort of PanNETs treated with chemotherapy, FAS demonstrated activity without significant safety concerns. FAS did not appear to affect subsequent PFS with everolimus; this sequence is being evaluated prospectively. Responses were noted with subsequent temozolomide-based regimens although PFS was possibly limited by line of therapy.

Prognostic transcriptome classes of duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Diedisheim ◽  
Solène Dermine ◽  
Anne Jouinot ◽  
Amandine Septier ◽  
Sébastien Gaujoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Pancreatic Beta Cell ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Pancreatic Alpha Cell ◽  
Liver Gene ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Definition Of

Duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (DPNETs) aggressiveness is heterogeneous. Tumor grade and extension are commonly used for prognostic determination. Yet, grade classes are empirically defined, with regular up-dates changing the definition of classes. Genomic screening may provide more objective classes, and reflect tumor biology. The aim of this study was to provide a transcriptome classification of DPNETs. We included 66 DPNETs, covering the entire clinical spectrum of the disease in terms of secretion, grade, and stage. Three distinct molecular groups were identified, associated with distinct outcome (log-rank p<0.01): (i) better-outcome DPNETs with pancreatic beta-cell signature. This group was mainly composed of well-differentiated, grade 1 insulinomas; (ii) poor-outcome DPNETs with pancreatic alpha-cell and hepatic signature. This group included all neuroendocrine carcinomas and grade 3 DPNETs, but also some grade 1 and grade 2 DPNETs; and (iii) intermediate-outcome DPNETs with pancreatic exocrine and progenitor signature. This group included grade 1 and grade 2 DPNETs, with some insulinomas. Fibrinogen gene FGA expression was one of the top most expressed liver gene. FGA expression was associated with disease-free survival (HR=1.13, p=0.005), and could be validated on two independent cohorts. This original pathophysiologic insight provides new prognostic classification perspectives.

Oxaliplatin Plus Irinotecan Compared With Irinotecan Alone as Second-Line Treatment After Single-Agent Fluoropyrimidine Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 4544-4550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel G. Haller ◽  
Mace L. Rothenberg ◽  
Alfred O. Wong ◽  
Piotr M. Koralewski ◽  
Wilson H. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Sensory Disturbances ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose To determine whether irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (IROX) is superior to irinotecan alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with single-agent fluoropyrimidines. Patients and Methods A phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of patients with metastatic or recurrent CRC that had progressed or recurred during or after adjuvant or first-line fluoropyrimidines (fluorouracil/leucovorin or capecitabine, the latter only for metastatic CRC). Patients received IROX (irinotecan 200 mg/m2 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2) or irinotecan alone (350 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. Results At the data cutoff (when 447 of 628 randomly assigned patients had died), median overall survival was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.4 to 14.7 months) and 11.1 month (95% CI, 10.0 to 12.7 months) in the IROX and irinotecan groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94; P = .0072). Overall response rate (22% v 7%, respectively; P < .0001), median time to progression (5.3 v 2.8 months, respectively; P < .0001), and improvement in tumor-related symptoms (32% v 19%, respectively; P = .0072) were also improved with IROX as compared with irinotecan. With the exception of granulocytopenia (25% v 13%), diarrhea (28% v 23%), and sensory disturbances (5% v 0%), grade 3 to 4 toxicities were comparable between the IROX and irinotecan groups, respectively. Conclusion IROX is an effective treatment for metastatic CRC that has progressed after first-line fluoropyrimidine therapy. IROX improves efficacy compared with irinotecan alone, providing an additional option in the postadjuvant or second-line treatment setting for patients who experience treatment failure with single-agent fluoropyrimidine therapy.

scholarly journals Randomised phase II trial of CAPTEM or FOLFIRI as SEcond-line therapy in NEuroendocrine CArcinomas and exploratory analysis of predictive role of PET/CT imaging and biological markers (SENECA trial): a study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e034393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Bongiovanni ◽  
Chiara Liverani ◽  
Sara Pusceddu ◽  
Silvana Leo ◽  
Giovanni Di Meglio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Predictive Role ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

IntroductionPatients with metastatic or locally advanced, non-resectable, grade 3 poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and lung neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are usually treated with in first-line platinum compounds. There is no standard second-line treatment on progression. Accurate biomarkers are needed to facilitate diagnosis and prognostic assessment of patients with NEC.Methods and analysisThe SEcond-line therapy in NEuroendocrine CArcinomas (SENECA) study is a randomised, non-comparative, multicentre phase II trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or capecitabine plus temozolomide (CAPTEM) regimens after failure of first-line chemotherapy in patients with lung NEC and GEP-NEC. Secondary aims are to correlate the serum miRNA profile and primary mutational status of MEN1, DAXX, ATRX and RB-1 with prognosis and outcome and to investigate the prognostic and predictive role of the Ki-67 score and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) or 68Ga-PET/CT. The main eligibility criteria are age ≥18 years; metastatic or locally advanced, non-resectable, grade 3 lung or GEP-NECs; progression to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. A Bryant and Day design taking into account treatment activity and toxicity was used to estimate the sample size. All analyses will be performed separately for each treatment group in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 112 patients (56/arm) will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive FOLFIRI every 14 days or CAPTEM every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 6 months. Patients undergo testing for specific biomarkers in primary tumour tissue and for miRNA in blood samples. MiRNA profiling will be performed in the first 20 patients who agree to participate in the biological substudy.Ethics and disseminationThe SENECA trial, supported by Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), was authorised by the locals Ethics Committee and the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Results will be widely disseminated via peer-reviewed manuscripts, conference presentations and reports to relevant authorities.The study is currently open in Italy.Trail registration numberNCT03387592; Pre-results. EudraCT-2016-000767-17.Protocol versionClinical Study Protocol Version 1, 7 November 2016.

scholarly journals Second-Line Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil for Gastric Cancer Patients after Failed Docetaxel and S-1

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo Young Jung ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
Baek-Yeol Ryoo ◽  
Boram Han ◽  
Ji Woong Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Antitumour Activity ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Background.This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and toxicities of second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) patients previously treated with docetaxel and S-1 with or without oxaliplatin (DS/DOS).Patients and Methods.We reviewed the data of patients who had previously been treated with first-line DS/DOS and received biweekly irinotecan-based chemotherapy (FOLFIRI/IFL) between October 2004 and November 2011.Results.A total of 209 cycles were administered to 35 patients, with a median of 4 (range, 1–22) cycles each. The overall response rate in 29 response-assessable patients was 17.2%, including 2 complete and 3 partial responses. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 3.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82–5.80) months and 6.24 (95% CI, 1.44–11.04) months, respectively. The major grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (8.6%).Conclusion.FOLFIRI/IFL chemotherapy showed modest antitumour activity and tolerable toxicities in DS/DOS-treated MGC patients.

scholarly journals Well differentiated grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors compared with related neoplasms: A morphologic study

2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (5) ◽  
pp. 326-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlie S. Sigel ◽  
Vitor Werneck Krauss Silva ◽  
Michelle D. Reid ◽  
David Chhieng ◽  
Olca Basturk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Morphologic Study ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3

scholarly journals Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Advanced, Well-Differentiated, Neuroendocrine Tumors Being Treated With a Somatostatin Analog: The GETNE-TRASGU Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (28) ◽  
pp. 2571-2580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Carmona-Bayonas ◽  
Paula Jiménez-Fonseca ◽  
Ángela Lamarca ◽  
Jorge Barriuso ◽  
Ángel Castaño ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Failure Time ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Accelerated Failure Time Model ◽  
Endocrine Tumors ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Well Differentiated

PURPOSE Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended for the first-line treatment of most patients with well-differentiated, gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors; however, benefit from treatment is heterogeneous. The aim of the current study was to develop and validate a progression-free survival (PFS) prediction model in SSA-treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We extracted data from the Spanish Group of Neuroendocrine and Endocrine Tumors Registry (R-GETNE). Patient eligibility criteria included GEP primary, Ki-67 of 20% or less, and first-line SSA monotherapy for advanced disease. An accelerated failure time model was developed to predict PFS, which was represented as a nomogram and an online calculator. The nomogram was externally validated in an independent series of consecutive eligible patients (The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom). RESULTS We recruited 535 patients (R-GETNE, n = 438; Manchester, n = 97). Median PFS and overall survival in the derivation cohort were 28.7 (95% CI, 23.8 to 31.1) and 85.9 months (95% CI, 71.5 to 96.7 months), respectively. Nine covariates significantly associated with PFS were primary tumor location, Ki-67 percentage, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, alkaline phosphatase, extent of liver involvement, presence of bone and peritoneal metastases, documented progression status, and the presence of symptoms when initiating SSA. The GETNE-TRASGU (Treated With Analog of Somatostatin in Gastroenteropancreatic and Unknown Primary NETs) model demonstrated suitable calibration, as well as fair discrimination ability with a C-index value of 0.714 (95% CI, 0.680 to 0.747) and 0.732 (95% CI, 0.658 to 0.806) in the derivation and validation series, respectively. CONCLUSION The GETNE-TRASGU evidence-based prognostic tool stratifies patients with GEP neuroendocrine tumors receiving SSA treatment according to their estimated PFS. This nomogram may be useful when stratifying patients with neuroendocrine tumors in future trials. Furthermore, it could be a valuable tool for making treatment decisions in daily clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document