scholarly journals Development of Dry Control Technology for Emissions of Mercury in Flue Gas

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
HANN S. HUANG ◽  
JIANN M. WU ◽  
C. DAVID LIVENGOOD
Keyword(s):  
Flue Gas ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang GAO ◽  
Zuliang WU ◽  
Zhongyang LUO ◽  
Mingjiang NI ◽  
Kefa CEN

2013 ◽  
Vol 788 ◽  
pp. 466-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Di Hao ◽  
Tian Zhai ◽  
Yong Fang Zhang ◽  
Jian Yong Lei ◽  
Tian Qi Cheng ◽  
...  

The peak of power consumption will be brought by the rapid development of the industry. Thermal power is still the main component of electric energy at present. More and more attention has been paid on the atmospheric pollution caused by the thermal power plant in our country. The sulfur dioxide (SO2), one of the thermal power plant flue gases, is dangerous to the environment and human. Effective SO2 control technology can not only reduce the environmental pollution but also the sulfur can be recovered in order to conserve resources.


2012 ◽  
Vol 610-613 ◽  
pp. 1176-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Yue ◽  
Fan Wang ◽  
Bin Jie Han ◽  
Peng Lai Zuo ◽  
Fan Zhang

The heavy metals including Pb, Cd, Cr, As and Mn emission characteristics of coal-fired power plant boilers, industrial boilers, lead and zinc smelters, cement kilns, and steel industries were studied in this paper. The removing effects of heavy metals by pollution control technology were analyzed. ICP-AES method was used to measure the contents of heavy metals in solid samples. In addition, M-29, the U.S. EPA isokinetic sampling method was used to sample heavy metals in the flue gas, and the sampled heavy metals were tested by ICP-AES-hydride generator system. For coal-fired boilers, heavy metal contents in descending order were Mn, Pb and Cd in the tested coal. The heavy metals’ emission concentrations of coal-fired industrial boilers were much higher than the heavy metals’ emission concentrations of power plants. For the lead and zinc smelters, Pb and its compounds in flue gas after cleaning can meet the emission standards. The heavy metal contents in the cement raw materials in descending order were Pb, Cr and Cd. For the sintering mixture, the heavy metal contents in descending order were Pb, Cr and Cd as well. The removal effects of heavy metals by existing pollutant control technologies in the various typical industries were also tested and analyzed in the paper. The research did in the paper made a scientific basis for controlling heavy metal emissions from typical industries.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 397-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lifang Guo ◽  
Youju Shu ◽  
Junmin Gao

Author(s):  
Bradley Ginger

Advances in gasification technology have opened up a number of commercial opportunities to generate energy from a wide range of non-traditional feed stocks. Gasification technology platforms from a number of providers are in development with the goal of creating modular solutions for supplying the energy needs of local communities, often in solutions as small as 10 to 20 MW increments. Such technologies offer potential project developers the ability to explore local opportunities for fuel supply from a number of sources. These opportunity fuels cover a wide range of potential energy sources as far reaching as recovered plastic, recovered tires, poultry litter, and a wide variety of woody biomass. The syn-gas produced from the gasification of such varied opportunity fuels contains a number of undesired trace components. These components will need to either be removed via gas conditioning, or alternatively be combusted with the syn-gas in an oxidation step which will produce a flue gas requiring air pollution control. Gas conditioning requirements vary depending on the desired end use of the syn-gas whether as a utility quality fuel or as an intermediate to a further chemical pathway. Flue gas target levels are defined by current environmental legislation. The potential pollutants produced in the flue gas pathway include Particulate Matter, Hydrogen Chloride, Sulfur Dioxide, Sulfuric Acid Mist, and Oxides of Nitrogen. To ensure operational compliance of the system stack emissions both now and in the future, proper pollution control technology is paramount. This presentation will address an emerging air pollution control technology that embodies all of these removal steps in a single device specifically designed to meet current and expected future environmental needs. EISENMANN’s recently patented multi-pollutant control system, the Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Dual Field or WESP-2F, includes the use of a pre-scrubbing chamber for large PM, SO2, and water soluble NO2 removal. Following the quench and pre-scrubbing region, a specially tuned downflow wet ESP field is responsible for finer PM and Sulfuric Acid aerosol removal, as well as an important Ozone producing stage that oxidizes non-water soluble forms of NOx. As the gas continues to travel through the system, a secondary scrubbing chamber is used to further reduce NOx by scrubbing the newly formed NO2 that has been formed from the oxidation of other forms of NOx through the use of Ozone produced by the electrostatic precipitator. The final polishing stage of the system includes an upflow wet electrostatic precipitator field for the removal of newly oxidized material as well as any heavy metals present. Research and testing on the aforementioned system took place using a pilot sized unit operating a slipstream off a 20 MW commercial sized gasifier testing a number of opportunity fuels. Expected performance was validated proving high removal efficiencies for pollutants specifically addressed earlier. Results from a wide variety of opportunity fuels will be discussed. Current implementation of the technology in gasification projects following the flue gas pathway is underway and is currently viewed as an acceptable solution to the environmental regulations associated with the plant requirements.


2015 ◽  
Vol 737 ◽  
pp. 612-615
Author(s):  
Jie Miao ◽  
Feng Qian ◽  
Liang Guo ◽  
Fan Wang

Mercury emissions from cement plants has attracted the attention of the world, the United States and the European Union and other developed countries have already made strictly limitations of mercury emission from cement plants,China has also been developed to limitation of mercury emission from cement plants. Mercury of cement plants comes mainly from coal and raw materials.,and mercury from flue gas can be removed by removal equipment, so you can use mercury control technology to remove mercury in flue gas. Depending on the different size and raw materials, of the plants, and mercury emissions under different conditions is not the same, so there is no mature mercury removal technology can be applied directly.1 Overview


RSC Advances ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (64) ◽  
pp. 59009-59015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yang ◽  
Wenqing Xu ◽  
Yinghong Wu ◽  
Jin Xiong ◽  
Tingyu Zhu ◽  
...  

Adding CaBr2 to coal to enhance elemental mercury (Hg0) oxidation during combustion has been an effective mercury control technology, but the added CaBr2 may increase levels of noxious Br2 or HBr gases in flue gas.


10.2172/82486 ◽  
1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hann S. Huang ◽  
Jiann M. Wu ◽  
C.D. Livengood
Keyword(s):  
Flue Gas ◽  

1912 ◽  
Vol 74 (1914supp) ◽  
pp. 159-160
Author(s):  
Lawford H. Fry
Keyword(s):  
Flue Gas ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document