Mental Health Outcomes in Adolescent and Young Adult Female Cancer Survivors of a Sexual Minority

Author(s):  
Milli J. Desai ◽  
Rebecca S. Gold ◽  
Chelsea K. Jones ◽  
Hena Din ◽  
Andrew C. Dietz ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02019
Author(s):  
Riddhita De ◽  
Rinku Sutradhar ◽  
Paul Kurdyak ◽  
Suriya Aktar ◽  
Jason D. Pole ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Risk and predictors of long-term mental health outcomes in survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers are poorly characterized. Mental health is consequently neglected in long-term follow-up. METHODS We identified all AYA in Ontario, Canada age 15-21 years when diagnosed with one of six common cancers between 1992-2012 using a population-based database, and compared them with matched controls. Linkage to provincial healthcare data allowed analysis of rates of outpatient (family physician and psychiatrist) visits for psychiatric indications and time to severe psychiatric events (emergency room visit, hospitalization, and suicide). Demographic-, disease-, and treatment-related predictors of adverse outcomes, including treatment setting (adult v pediatric), were examined. RESULTS Among 2,208 survivors and 10,457 matched controls, 5-year survivors experienced higher rates of outpatient mental health visits than controls (671 visits per 1,000 person-years v 506; adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5; P = .006). Risk of a severe psychiatric episode was also increased among survivors (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.4, P = .008). Risk of a psychotic disorder–associated severe event was doubled in survivors (HR, 2.0, 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.4; P = .007) although absolute risk remained low (15-year cumulative incidence 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.7). In multivariable analysis, survivors treated in adult centers experienced substantially higher outpatient visit rates compared with those treated in pediatric settings (RR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.1; P = .04). CONCLUSION Survivors of AYA cancer are at substantially increased risk of adverse mental health outcomes, with those treated in adult centers at particular risk. Although absolute incidence was low, survivors were at increased risk of psychotic disorder–associated severe events. Long-term mental health surveillance is warranted, as is research into effective interventions during or after cancer treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 918-924
Author(s):  
Wei-Heng Kao ◽  
Chang-Fu Kuo ◽  
Meng-Jiun Chiou ◽  
Yu-Cheng Liu ◽  
Chun-Chieh Wang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. e16
Author(s):  
C. Lam ◽  
K. Shliakhtsitsava ◽  
S.S. Stark ◽  
B.W. Whitcomb ◽  
H. Su

Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (13) ◽  
pp. 2101-2109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Benedict ◽  
Bridgette Thom ◽  
Danielle N. Friedman ◽  
Debbie Diotallevi ◽  
Elaine M. Pottenger ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 2709-2716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula M. Sansom-Daly ◽  
Claire E. Wakefield ◽  
Eden G. Robertson ◽  
Brittany C. McGill ◽  
Helen L. Wilson ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 618-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmund Silins ◽  
Wendy Swift ◽  
Tim Slade ◽  
Barbara Toson ◽  
Bryan Rodgers ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 121-121
Author(s):  
Nirupa Jaya Raghunathan ◽  
Bridgette Thom ◽  
Danielle Novetsky Friedman ◽  
Catherine Benedict ◽  
Joanne Frankel Kelvin

121 Background: More than 362,000 female cancer survivors under 40 years old live in the US. Research consistently shows no increased cancer risk among offspring of cancer survivors in the absence of a hereditary cancer. Still survivors voice concerns over the health of future children. This analysis explores young adult female cancer survivors’ (YAFCS) perceptions of genetic cancer risk and related reproductive concerns. Methods: Eligible females were aged 18-35, at least one year post-treatment. Participants were recruited using social media posts from 17 young adult cancer advocacy groups and directed to an anonymous web-based survey that included the Reproductive Concerns after Cancer Scale (RCACS), with a 3-item “Concerns about Future Child Health” subscale. Results: 346 YAFCS completed the full survey, and based on logic-based branching, 192 respondents could have completed the RCACS: 177 (92%) completed the entire scale and 187 (97%) completed the child’s health subscale. Mean RCACS score was 58.5 (sd = 11.6; range 22-86); mean child’s health score was 11.3 (sd = 3.3; range 3-15), with a negative skew. At the item-level, 65% of the sample worried about passing along cancer risk to offspring; 71% worried about family health history affecting future children; and 60% were afraid their children would have a high chance of getting cancer. RCACS and child’s health subscale scores did not vary by age, race, education, income, or diagnosis. Further, mean scores did not vary between survivors of family cancer syndromes (breast, ovarian, colorectal) and those with other diagnoses (RCACS: t = 1.4, df = 175, p = .14; child’s health: t = 0.02, df = 185, p = .99). Conclusions: Despite studies showing minimal genetic cancer risk in offspring of survivors, many YAFCS have concerns about the health of future children. This may be related to mistaken beliefs that genetic mutations within tumor cells are transmissible or unawareness of availability of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for embryo selection in those with transmissible genetic mutations. There is a need to educate patients about these issues to enable them to make family building choices based on accurate information about genetic risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document