Simple Purse String Laparoscopic Versus Open Hernia Repair

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mairi Steven ◽  
Peter Carson ◽  
Stephen Bell ◽  
Rebecca Ward ◽  
Merrill McHoney
2003 ◽  
Vol 237 (4) ◽  
pp. 574-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. O’Dwyer ◽  
Michael G. Serpell ◽  
Keith Millar ◽  
Caron Paterson ◽  
David Young ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Waleed Yusif El Sherpiny

Background: Inguinal mesh hernioplasty is one of the common procedures performed all over the world. It can be done either through open or laparoscopic techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of Lichtenstein tension free hernioplasty versus laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) mesh repair considering, duration of the surgery, hospital stay, and duration to resume normal activity, degree of postoperative pain, wound infection, recurrence and complications.Methods: Adult patients presented to the general surgical OPD, with the diagnosis of inguinal hernia underwent either Lichtenstein repair or laparoscopic repair by TAPP.Results: Patients in Group A (open-repair) had significantly greater level of local pain during rest and during routine activities than those within Group B (laparoscopic group) during the postoperative period assessed on the visual-analogue scale. Mean operative time for open hernia repair was 43.7 minutes and for laparoscopic hernia repair was 59.03 minutes and the difference were statistically significant (p=0.0001). The mean duration of hospital stay for open hernia repair was 2.16 days and that for laparoscopic hernia repair was 1.08 days with a (p=0.00001) which was statistically significant. The time to resume routine activities was much shorter among Group B patients than patients in Group A. Only one recurrence (3.3%) was seen in Group B after 6 months follow up.Conclusions: It is concluded that laparoscopic TAPP repair of inguinal hernia in adults is safe and preferred operation as compared to open inguinal hernia repair.


Hernia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1215-1219
Author(s):  
J. Lawson ◽  
A. McGill ◽  
H. Meares ◽  
H. Coleman ◽  
C. Riveros ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
M. Hunter Witt ◽  
Adam R. Eppler ◽  
Ahmed M. Mahmoud

We describe a case of a 70-year-old female who presented with pain and swelling in her right groin. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis found Amyand’s hernia with evidence of inflammation of the appendiceal tip consistent with appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy and open hernia repair revealed an incarcerated hernia. Using blunt dissection, the inflamed tip of the appendix was found in the femoral canal. The appendix was removed. The patient had a De Garengeot’s hernia, not the Amyand’s hernia initially suspected. Patient was discharged home the following day.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Rohit Prasad Yadav ◽  
Dipendra Thakur ◽  
Bashu Dev Baskota ◽  
Amit Kumar Shah ◽  
Kaushal Samsher Thapa ◽  
...  

 Background: Hernia is the abnormal exit of an organ or fatty tissue, such as the bowel, through the weak wall of the cavity in which it normally resides. Repair of inguinal hernia is common surgical  procedures. This study aims to compare between laparoscopic and open hernia repair. Method: Study is non randomized comparative study. Study includes 76 patients who had undergone surgery for hernioplasty. Among them 38 undergone laparoscopic hernioplasty and 38 undergone open hernioplasty from June 2016 to August 2018. Results: Mean hospital stay was 2.95 days in group 1 and 4.03 in group 2 .VAS was found to be 2.45 in group 1 and 5.71 in group 2 which is significantly low in group 1 patients with p<0.001. Duration of surgery is more in group 1 with mean duration of 94.08 minutes comparing to group 2 with mean duration of 43.55 minutes (with p<0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic hernia repair offers advantages over open repair in terms of less hospital stay and lower pain score for patient not contraindicated for general anesthesia and complicated hernia.


1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.D.K. Hill ◽  
P.E. Banwell ◽  
A. Darzi ◽  
N. Menzies-Gow ◽  
J.R.T. Monson ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. Maddern ◽  
G. Rudkin ◽  
J.R. Bessell ◽  
P. Devitt ◽  
L. Ponte

Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius Balogh ◽  
Angela Chen ◽  
Tejaswi Marri ◽  
Johanna B De Haan ◽  
Sara Guzman-Reyes

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1019
Author(s):  
Irene Sellbrandt ◽  
Metha Brattwall ◽  
Pether Jildenstål ◽  
Margareta Warrén Stomberg ◽  
Jan G. Jakobsson

Background: Day surgery is increasing, and safe and effective logistics are sought. One part of the in-theatre logistics commonly discussed is whether surgical scrub and sterile covering should be done before or after induction of anaesthesia. The aim of the present study was to compare the impact of surgical scrub and sterile covering before vs. after the induction of anaesthesia in male patients scheduled for open hernia repair.    Methods: This is a prospective randomised study. Sixty ASA 1-3 patients scheduled for open hernia repair were randomised to surgical scrub and sterile covering before or after induction of anaesthesia; group “awake” and group “anaesthetised”, respectively. Patients and theatre nurses were asked about their experiences and willingness to have the same logistics on further potential surgeries, through a survey provided before post-surgery. Duration of anaesthesia, surgery, theatre time, recovery room stay and time to discharge was studied. Results: There was no difference in the patients’ assessment of quality of care, and only one patient in the awake group would prefer to be anaesthetised on a future procedure. All nurses found pre-anaesthesia scrubbing acceptable as routine. The duration of anaesthesia was shorter and doses of propofol and remifentanil were reduced by 10 and 13%, respectively, in the awake group. Time in recovery area was significantly reduced in the awake group (p<0.05), but time to discharge was not different. Conclusion: Surgical scrub and sterile covering before the induction of anaesthesia can be done safely and without jeopardising patients’ quality of care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document