Body Mass and Atherogenic Dyslipidemia as Major Determinants of Blood Levels of B-Type Natriuretic Peptides in Arab Subjects With Acute Coronary Syndromes

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abayomi O. Akanji ◽  
Cheriyil G. Suresh ◽  
Reem Al-Radwan ◽  
Hasmukh R. Fatania
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Moscarella ◽  
P Calabro ◽  
F Gragnano ◽  
A Cesaro ◽  
P.C Pafundi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The protective effect of obesity on mortality in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients remains debated. We aimed at evaluating the impact of obesity on ischemic and bleeding events as possible explanations to the obesity paradox in ACS patients. Methods For the purpose of this sub-study, patients enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry were stratified according to Body Mass Index (BMI) into three groups: normal, BMI <25kg/m2; overweight, BMI: 25–29.9kg/m2; obese, BMI ≥30kg/m2. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical endpoints (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding. Results Patients were classified as follows: 410 (33.9%) normal, 538 (44.5%) overweight, 261 (21.6%) obese. Compared to the normal weight group, obese and overweight patients had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, but were younger, with a better left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and lower PRECISE-DAPT score. At one-year follow-up NACE was more frequently observed in normal than in overweight and obese patients (15.1%,8.6%,and9.6%, respectively; p=0.004), driven by a significantly higher rate of all-cause death (6.3%,2.6%, and 3.8%, respectively; p=0.008), while no significant differences were noted in terms of MI, stroke, and major bleeding. When correcting for confounding variables, BMI loses its power in independently predicting outcomes, failing to confirm the obesity paradox in a real-world ACS population. Conclusions Our study conflicts the obesity paradox in real-world ACS population, and suggest that the reduced mortality rate may be explained by a lower bleeding risk in obese patients allowing a more aggressive medical treatment, and by a better LVEF translating into a higher survival rate. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos I Nikolaou ◽  
Michalis J Koutouzis ◽  
Apostolos Christou ◽  
Georgios M Fournarakis ◽  
Sotirios P Patsilinakos ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radomir Matunovic ◽  
Aleksandar Stojanovic ◽  
Zdravko Mijailovic ◽  
Zoran Cosic

Natriuretic peptides in acute coronary syndromes Brain natriuretic peptides (BNP) and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptides (N-proBNP) have been shown to provide important prognostic information in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Ischemia may be an important stimulus for BNP release. This does not imply, however, that BNP is useful for diagnosing ischemia, and BNP is unlikely to prove sensitive or specific enough for this purpose. Significance of natriuretic peptides in assessing prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes In patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, higher BNP and N-proBNP levels have been shown to predict a grater likelihood of death or heart faiulure, independent of other prognostic factors. Therapeutic implications of BNP elevation in acute coronary syndromes Patients with BNP or NT-proBNP elevation following ACS are clearly at high risk for death and for developement of heart failure, but specific therapeutic implications of BNP elevation have not been defined. In particular, it is not known how patients with BNP elevation should be treated considering the fact that they have normal troponin levels and no clinical evidence of heart failure. Multimarker strategies for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes It has been shown recently that in patients with acute coronary syndromes the risk increased sequentially among those with one, two or three elevated biomarkers. Therapeutic applications of cardiac biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes Multimarker strategies, that incorporate panels of cardiac bio?markers, are likely to be used in the future for risk stratification and for pathophysiologically-guided treatement of patients with ACS.


2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (01+02/2013) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosra Zayani ◽  
Monia Allal-Elasmi ◽  
Marie Jacob ◽  
Wiem Zidi ◽  
Amira Zaroui ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Farmakis ◽  
Gerasimos Filippatos ◽  
Marco Tubaro ◽  
W. Frank Peacock ◽  
Salvatore DiSomma ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Lahu ◽  
M Behnes ◽  
G Ndrepepa ◽  
F J Neumann ◽  
D Sibbing ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) according to body mass index (BMI) remain unknown. Purpose To assess the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with ACS according to BMI. Methods This post-hoc analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial included 3987 patients with BMI data available. BMI was grouped in 3 categories: low (BMI<25 kg/m2, n=1084), intermediate (BMI ≥25 to <30 kg/m2, n=1890) and high (BMI≥30 kg/m2, n=1013). The primary endpoint was the 12-month incidence of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The secondary endpoint was the 12-month incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 to 5 bleeding. Results There was no significant treatment arm-by-BMI interaction regarding the primary endpoint (Pint=0.578). However, the primary endpoint occurred in 63 patients assigned to ticagrelor and 39 patients assigned to prasugrel in the low BMI group (11.7% vs. 7.5%; hazard ratio [HR]=1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–2.42; P=0.018), 78 patients assigned to ticagrelor and 58 patients assigned to prasugrel in the intermediate BMI group (8.3% vs. 6.2%; HR=1.36 [0.97–1.91]; P=0.076), and 43 patients assigned to ticagrelor and 37 patients assigned to prasugrel in the high BMI group (8.6% vs. 7.3%; HR=1.18 [0.76–1.84]; P=0.451). BARC type 3 to 5 bleeding events did not differ between ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with low (6.5% vs. 6.6%), intermediate (5.6% vs. 5.0%), or high (4.4% vs. 2.8%) BMI. Conclusions BMI of patients with ACS did not impact significantly on the treatment effect of ticagrelor vs. prasugrel in terms of both efficacy and safety. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): German Center for Cardiovascular Research;Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Germany


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document