Time-Dependent Changes in Serum Biomarker Levels after Blast Traumatic Brain Injury

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Gyorgy ◽  
Geoffrey Ling ◽  
Daniel Wingo ◽  
John Walker ◽  
Lawrence Tong ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (24) ◽  
pp. 3705-3711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Ahmed ◽  
Andrea Gyorgy ◽  
Alaa Kamnaksh ◽  
Geoffrey Ling ◽  
Lawrence Tong ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjmilitary-2020-001655
Author(s):  
J W Denny ◽  
R J Brown ◽  
M G Head ◽  
J Batchelor ◽  
A S Dickinson

IntroductionThere is little systematic tracking or detailed analysis of investments in research and development for blast injury to support decision-making around research future funding.MethodsThis study examined global investments into blast injury-related research from public and philanthropic funders across 2000–2019. Research databases were searched using keywords, and open data were extracted from funder websites. Data collected included study title, abstract, award amount, funder and year. Individual awards were categorised to compare amounts invested into different blast injuries, the scientific approaches taken and analysis of research investment into blast traumatic brain injury (TBI).ResultsA total of 806 awards were identified into blast injury-related research globally, equating to US$902.1 million (m, £565.9m GBP). There was a general increase in year-on-year investment between 2003 and 2009 followed by a consistent decline in annual funding since 2010. Pre-clinical research received $671.3 m (74.4%) of investment. Brain-related injury research received $427.7 m (47.4%), orthopaedic injury $138.6 m (15.4%), eye injury $63.7 m (7.0%) and ear injury $60.5m (6.7%). Blast TBI research received a total investment of $384.3 m, representing 42.6% of all blast injury-related research. The U.S. Department of Defense funded $719.3 m (80%).ConclusionsInvestment data suggest that blast TBI research has received greater funding than other blast injury health areas. The funding pattern observed can be seen as reactive, driven by the response to the War on Terror, the rising profile of blast TBI and congressionally mandated research.


Author(s):  
Saef Izzy ◽  
Qiong Liu ◽  
Zhou Fang ◽  
Sevda Lule ◽  
Limin Wu ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 1631-1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Walder ◽  
Xavier Robin ◽  
Marie My Lien Rebetez ◽  
Jean-Christophe Copin ◽  
Yvan Gasche ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Martin ◽  
Lara Zimmermann ◽  
Kee D. Kim ◽  
Marike Zwienenberg ◽  
Kiarash Shahlaie

Traumatic brain injury remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury are best treated with a multidisciplinary, evidence-based, protocol-directed approach, which has been shown to decrease mortality and improve functional outcomes. Therapy is directed at the prevention of secondary brain injury through optimizing cerebral blood flow and the delivery of metabolic fuel (ie, oxygen and glucose). This is accomplished through the measurement and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), the strict avoidance of hypotension and hypoxemia, and in some instances, surgical management. The treatment of elevated ICP is approached in a protocolized, tiered manner, with escalation of care occurring in the setting of refractory intracranial hypertension, culminating in either decompressive surgery or barbiturate coma. With such an approach, the rates of mortality secondary to traumatic brain injury are declining despite an increasing incidence of traumatic brain injury. This review contains 3 figures, 5 tables and 69 reference Key Words: blast traumatic brain injury, brain oxygenation, cerebral perfusion pressure, decompressive craniectomy, hyperosmolar therapy, intracranial pressure, neurocritical care, penetrating traumatic brain injury, severe traumatic brain injury


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Oyola ◽  
Ashley Russell ◽  
Lauren Miller ◽  
Robert Handa ◽  
Tao-Yiao Wu

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 1886-1897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Bajaj ◽  
Natalie S. Dailey ◽  
Isabelle M. Rosso ◽  
Scott L. Rauch ◽  
William D. S. Killgore

Neurotrauma ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 111-122
Author(s):  
Elizabeth McNeil ◽  
Zachary Bailey ◽  
Allison Guettler ◽  
Pamela VandeVord

Blast traumatic brain injury (bTBI) is a leading cause of head injury in soldiers returning from the battlefield. Primary blast brain injury remains controversial with little evidence to support a primary mechanism of injury. The four main theories described herein include blast wave transmission through skull orifices, direct cranial transmission, thoracic surge, and skull flexure dynamics. It is possible that these mechanisms do not occur exclusively from each other, but rather that several of them lead to primary blast brain injury. Biomechanical investigation with in-vivo, cadaver, and finite element models would greatly increase our understanding of bTBI mechanisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document