scholarly journals Cohesin Associates with Spindle Poles in a Mitosis-specific Manner and Functions in Spindle Assembly in Vertebrate Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1289-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangduo Kong ◽  
Alexander R. Ball ◽  
Eiichiro Sonoda ◽  
Jie Feng ◽  
Shunichi Takeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Pairing ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mitotic Apparatus ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Specific Manner

Cohesin is an essential protein complex required for sister chromatid cohesion. Cohesin associates with chromosomes and establishes sister chromatid cohesion during interphase. During metaphase, a small amount of cohesin remains at the chromosome-pairing domain, mainly at the centromeres, whereas the majority of cohesin resides in the cytoplasm, where its functions remain unclear. We describe the mitosis-specific recruitment of cohesin to the spindle poles through its association with centrosomes and interaction with nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA). Overexpression of NuMA enhances cohesin accumulation at spindle poles. Although transient cohesin depletion does not lead to visible impairment of normal spindle formation, recovery from nocodazole-induced spindle disruption was significantly impaired. Importantly, selective blocking of cohesin localization to centromeres, which disrupts centromeric sister chromatid cohesion, had no effect on this spindle reassembly process, clearly separating the roles of cohesin at kinetochores and spindle poles. In vitro, chromosome-independent spindle assembly using mitotic extracts was compromised by cohesin depletion, and it was rescued by addition of cohesin that was isolated from mitotic, but not S phase, cells. The combined results identify a novel spindle-associated role for human cohesin during mitosis, in addition to its function at the centromere/kinetochore regions.

scholarly journals A Potential Role for Human Cohesin in Mitotic Spindle Aster Assembly

2001 ◽  
Vol 276 (50) ◽  
pp. 47575-47582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather C. Gregson ◽  
John A. Schmiesing ◽  
Jong-Soo Kim ◽  
Toshiki Kobayashi ◽  
Sharleen Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

The cohesin multiprotein complex containing SMC1, SMC3, Scc3 (SA), and Scc1 (Rad21) is required for sister chromatid cohesion in eukaryotes. Although metazoan cohesin associates with chromosomes and was shown to function in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during interphase, the majority of cohesin was found to be off chromosomes and reside in the cytoplasm in metaphase. Despite its dissociation from chromosomes, however, microinjection of an antibody against human SMC1 led to disorganization of the metaphase plate and cell cycle arrest, indicating that human cohesin still plays an important role in metaphase. To address the mitotic function of human cohesin, the subcellular localization of cohesin components was reexamined in human cells. Interestingly, we found that cohesin localizes to the spindle poles during mitosis and interacts with NuMA, a spindle pole-associated factor required for mitotic spindle organization. The interaction with NuMA persists during interphase. Similar to NuMA, a significant amount of cohesin was found to associate with the nuclear matrix. Furthermore, in the absence of cohesin, mitotic spindle asters failed to formin vitro. Our results raise the intriguing possibility that in addition to its well demonstrated function in sister chromatid cohesion, cohesin may be involved in spindle assembly during mitosis.

scholarly journals ATP dependent DNA transport within cohesin: Scc2 clamps DNA on top of engaged heads while Scc3 promotes entrapment within the SMC-kleisin ring

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E Collier ◽  
Byung-Gil Lee ◽  
Maurici B Roig ◽  
Stanislav Yatskevich ◽  
Naomi J Petela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Atp Hydrolysis ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Coiled Coils ◽  
Rigorous Proof ◽  
Dna Loops ◽  
Dna Transport ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

SUMMARYIn addition to extruding DNA loops, cohesin entraps within its SMC-kleisin ring (S-K) individual DNAs during G1 and sister DNAs during S-phase. All three activities require related hook-shaped proteins called Scc2 and Scc3. Using thiol-specific crosslinking we provide rigorous proof of entrapment activity in vitro. Scc2 alone promotes entrapment of DNAs in the E-S and E-K compartments, between ATP-bound engaged heads and the SMC hinge and associated kleisin, respectively. This does not require ATP hydrolysis nor is it accompanied by entrapment within S-K rings, which is a slower process requiring Scc3. Cryo-EM reveals that DNAs transported into E-S/E-K compartments are “clamped” in a sub-compartment created by Scc2’s association with engaged heads whose coiled coils are folded around their elbow. We suggest that clamping may be a recurrent feature of cohesin complexes active in loop extrusion and that this conformation precedes the S-K entrapment required for sister chromatid cohesion.

scholarly journals Transport of DNA within cohesin involves clamping on top of engaged heads by Scc2 and entrapment within the ring by Scc3

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E Collier ◽  
Byung-Gil Lee ◽  
Maurici Brunet Roig ◽  
Stanislav Yatskevich ◽  
Naomi J Petela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Atp Hydrolysis ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Coiled Coils ◽  
Rigorous Proof ◽  
Dna Loops ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

In addition to extruding DNA loops, cohesin entraps within its SMC-kleisin ring (S-K) individual DNAs during G1 and sister DNAs during S-phase. All three activities require related hook-shaped proteins called Scc2 and Scc3. Using thiol-specific crosslinking we provide rigorous proof of entrapment activity in vitro. Scc2 alone promotes entrapment of DNAs in the E-S and E-K compartments, between ATP-bound engaged heads and the SMC hinge and associated kleisin, respectively. This does not require ATP hydrolysis nor is it accompanied by entrapment within S-K rings, which is a slower process requiring Scc3. Cryo-EM reveals that DNAs transported into E-S/E-K compartments are ‘clamped’ in a sub-compartment created by Scc2’s association with engaged heads whose coiled coils are folded around their elbow. We suggest that clamping may be a recurrent feature of cohesin complexes active in loop extrusion and that this conformation precedes the S-K entrapment required for sister chromatid cohesion.

scholarly journals Absence of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint restores mitotic fidelity upon loss of sister chromatid cohesion

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui D. Silva ◽  
Mihailo Mirkovic ◽  
Leonardo G. Guilgur ◽  
Om S. Rathore ◽  
Rui Gonçalo Martinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Survival ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Genome Shuffling ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Abnormal Development ◽  
Wing Development ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

AbstractSister chromatid cohesion is essential for faithful mitosis, as premature cohesion loss leads to random chromosome segregation and aneuploidy, resulting in abnormal development. To identify specific conditions capable of restoring defects associated with cohesion loss, we screened for genes whose depletion modulates Drosophila wing development when sister chromatid cohesion is impaired. Cohesion deficiency was induced by knock-down of the acetyltransferase Separation anxiety (San)/Naa50, a cohesin complex stabilizer. Several genes whose function impacts wing development upon cohesion loss were identified. Surprisingly, knockdown of key Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) proteins, Mad2 and Mps1, suppressed developmental defects associated with San depletion. SAC impairment upon cohesin removal, triggered by San depletion or artificial removal of the cohesin complex, prevented extensive genome shuffling, reduced segregation defects and restored cell survival. This counterintuitive phenotypic suppression was caused by an intrinsic bias for efficient chromosome bi-orientation at mitotic entry, coupled with slow engagement of error-correction reactions. We conclude that mitotic timing determines the severity of defects associated with cohesion deficiency. Therefore, although divisions are still error-prone, SAC inactivation enhances cell survival and tissue homeostasis upon cohesion loss.

scholarly journals PCNA Controls Establishment of Sister Chromatid Cohesion during S Phase

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 723-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
George-Lucian Moldovan ◽  
Boris Pfander ◽  
Stefan Jentsch
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

scholarly journals Hst3 Is Regulated by Mec1-dependent Proteolysis and Controls the S Phase Checkpoint and Sister Chromatid Cohesion by Deacetylating Histone H3 at Lysine 56

2007 ◽  
Vol 282 (52) ◽  
pp. 37805-37814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safia Thaminy ◽  
Benjamin Newcomb ◽  
Jessica Kim ◽  
Tonibelle Gatbonton ◽  
Eric Foss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

scholarly journals Two Human Orthologues of Eco1/Ctf7 Acetyltransferases Are Both Required for Proper Sister-Chromatid Cohesion

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 3908-3918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fajian Hou ◽  
Hui Zou
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
Conserved Domain ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Acetyltransferase Domain

Genetic studies in yeast and Drosophila have uncovered a conserved acetyltransferase involved in sister-chromatid cohesion. Here, we described the two human orthologues, previously named EFO1/ESCO1 and EFO2/ESCO2. Similar to their yeast (Eco1/Ctf7 and Eso1) and fly (deco) counterparts, both proteins feature a conserved C-terminal domain consisting of a H2C2 zinc finger motif and an acetyltransferase domain that is able to catalyze autoacetylation reaction in vitro. However, no similarity can be detected outside of the conserved domain. RNA interference depletion experiment revealed that EFO1/ESCO1 and EFO2/ESCO2 were not redundant and that both were required for proper sister-chromatid cohesion. The difference between EFO1 and EFO2 also is reflected in their cell cycle regulation. In mitosis, EFO1 is phosphorylated, whereas EFO2 is degraded. Furthermore, both proteins associate with chromosomes, and the chromosome binding depends on the diverse N-terminal domains. We propose that EFO1 and EFO2 are targeted to different chromosome structures to help establish or maintain sister-chromatid cohesion.

scholarly journals The acetyltransferase activity of San stabilizes the mitotic cohesin at the centromeres in a shugoshin-independent manner

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fajian Hou ◽  
Chih-Wen Chu ◽  
Xiangduo Kong ◽  
Kyoko Yokomori ◽  
Hui Zou
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Acetyltransferase Activity ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Interphase Cells ◽  
Gain Access

Proper sister chromatid cohesion is critical for maintaining genetic stability. San is a putative acetyltransferase that is important for sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila melanogaster, but not in budding yeast. We showed that San is critical for sister chromatid cohesion in HeLa cells, suggesting that this mechanism may be conserved in metazoans. Furthermore, although a small fraction of San interacts with the NatA complex, San appears to mediate cohesion independently. San exhibits acetyltransferase activity in vitro, and its activity is required for sister chromatid cohesion in vivo. In the absence of San, Sgo1 localizes correctly throughout the cell cycle. However, cohesin is no longer detected at the mitotic centromeres. Furthermore, San localizes to the cytoplasm in interphase cells; thus, it may not gain access to chromosomes until mitosis. Moreover, in San-depleted cells, further depletion of Plk1 rescues the cohesion along the chromosome arms, but not at the centromeres. Collectively, San may be specifically required for the maintenance of the centromeric cohesion in mitosis.

scholarly journals Acetylation of the SUN protein Mps3 by Eco1 regulates its function in nuclear organization

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
pp. 2546-2559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Ghosh ◽  
Jennifer M. Gardner ◽  
Christine J. Smoyer ◽  
Jennifer M. Friederichs ◽  
Jay R. Unruh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Membrane ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Nuclear Organization ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SUN-domain protein Mps3 is required for duplication of the yeast centrosome-equivalent organelle, the spindle pole body (SPB), and it is involved in multiple aspects of nuclear organization, including telomere tethering and gene silencing at the nuclear membrane, establishment of sister chromatid cohesion, and repair of certain types of persistent DNA double-stranded breaks. How these diverse SUN protein functions are regulated is unknown. Here we show that the Mps3 N-terminus is a substrate for the acetyltransferase Eco1/Ctf7 in vitro and in vivo and map the sites of acetylation to three lysine residues adjacent to the Mps3 transmembrane domain. Mutation of these residues shows that acetylation is not essential for growth, SPB duplication, or distribution in the nuclear membrane. However, analysis of nonacetylatable mps3 mutants shows that this modification is required for accurate sister chromatid cohesion and for chromosome recruitment to the nuclear membrane. Acetylation of Mps3 by Eco1 is one of the few regulatory mechanisms known to control nuclear organization.

scholarly journals Interaction of NuMA protein with the kinesin Eg5: its possible role in bipolar spindle assembly and chromosome alignment

2013 ◽  
Vol 451 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Iwakiri ◽  
Sachiko Kamakura ◽  
Junya Hayase ◽  
Hideki Sumimoto
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Mitotic Apparatus ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Interphase Cells ◽  
Correct Alignment ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Bipolar spindle assembly in mitotic cells is a prerequisite to ensure correct alignment of chromosomes for their segregation to each daughter cell; spindle microtubules are tethered at plus ends to chromosomes and focused at minus ends to either of the two spindle poles. NuMA (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein) is present solely in the nucleus in interphase cells, but relocalizes during mitosis to the spindle poles to play a crucial role in spindle assembly via focusing spindle microtubules to each pole. In the present study we show that the kinesin-5 family motor Eg5 is a protein that directly interacts with NuMA, using a proteomics approach and various binding assays both in vivo and in vitro. During mitosis Eg5 appears to interact with NuMA in the vicinity of the spindle poles, whereas the interaction does not occur in interphase cells, where Eg5 is distributed throughout the cytoplasm but NuMA exclusively localizes to the nucleus. Slight, but significant, depletion of Eg5 in HeLa cells by RNA interference results in formation of less-focused spindle poles with misaligned chromosomes in metaphase; these phenotypes are similar to those induced by depletion of NuMA. Since NuMA is less accumulated at the spindle poles in Eg5-depleted cells, Eg5 probably contributes to spindle assembly via regulating NuMA localization. Furthermore, depletion of cytoplasmic dynein induces mislocalization of NuMA and phenotypes similar to those observed in NuMA-depleted cells, without affecting Eg5 localization to the spindles. Thus dynein appears to control NuMA function in conjunction with Eg5.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document