scholarly journals Promoter DNA Methylation Patterns of Differentiated Cells Are Largely Programmed at the Progenitor Stage

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 2066-2077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita L. Sørensen ◽  
Bente Marie Jacobsen ◽  
Andrew H. Reiner ◽  
Ingrid S. Andersen ◽  
Philippe Collas

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from various tissues share common phenotypic and functional properties. However, intrinsic molecular evidence supporting these observations has been lacking. Here, we unravel overlapping genome-wide promoter DNA methylation patterns between MSCs from adipose tissue, bone marrow, and skeletal muscle, whereas hematopoietic progenitors are more epigenetically distant from MSCs as a whole. Commonly hypermethylated genes are enriched in signaling, metabolic, and developmental functions, whereas genes hypermethylated only in MSCs are associated with early development functions. We find that most lineage-specification promoters are DNA hypomethylated and harbor a combination of trimethylated H3K4 and H3K27, whereas early developmental genes are DNA hypermethylated with or without H3K27 methylation. Promoter DNA methylation patterns of differentiated cells are largely established at the progenitor stage; yet, differentiation segregates a minor fraction of the commonly hypermethylated promoters, generating greater epigenetic divergence between differentiated cell types than between their undifferentiated counterparts. We also show an effect of promoter CpG content on methylation dynamics upon differentiation and distinct methylation profiles on transcriptionally active and inactive promoters. We infer that methylation state of lineage-specific promoters in MSCs is not a primary determinant of differentiation capacity. Our results support the view of a common origin of mesenchymal progenitors.

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 1257-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita L. Sørensen ◽  
Sanna Timoskainen ◽  
Franklin D. West ◽  
Kristin Vekterud ◽  
Andrew C. Boquest ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 734-734
Author(s):  
Grant A Challen ◽  
Allison Mayle ◽  
Deqiang Sun ◽  
Mira Jeong ◽  
Min Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract DNA methylation is one of the major epigenetic modifications in the vertebrate genome and is important for development, stem cell differentiation, and malignant transformation. DNA methylation is catalyzed by the DNA methyltransferase enzymes Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b. We have recently shown that Dnmt3a is essential for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) differentiation. Ablation of Dnmt3a in hematopoietic cells (Mx1-CRE; Dnmt3a-KO) resulted in HSCs that could not sustain peripheral blood generation after serial transplantation, while phenotypically defined HSCs accumulated in the bone marrow. Recurrent somatic mutations in DNTM3A have been discovered in patients with a wide range of hematopoietic malignancies (AML, MDS, MPN, CML, T-ALL, T-cell lymphoma) suggesting a critical role for de novo DNA methylation in normal and leukemic hematopoiesis. As Dnmt3b is also highly expressed in HSCs and congenital mutations in DNMT3B can cause ICF (immunodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies) syndrome, in this study we used a mouse model to investigate if Dnmt3b had distinct roles in HSCs. We conditionally inactivated Dnmt3b in HSCs using the Mx1-CRE system (Dnmt3b-KO) and performed serial competitive transplantation. Loss of Dnmt3b had minimal functional consequences for adult HSC function even after three rounds of transplantation. However, combinatorial deletion of both Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b (Dnmt3ab-dKO) exacerbated the differentiation defect seen in Dnmt3a-KO HSCs, leading to a dramatic accumulation of mutant HSCs in the bone marrow (>50-fold), suggesting a synergistic effect resulting from simultaneous ablation of both de novo DNA methyltransferases. The accumulation of Dnmt3ab-dKO HSCs cannot be attributed to altered proliferation or apoptosis, but is due to an imbalance between self-renewal and differentiation. RNA-SEQ of the mutant HSCs revealed loss of transcriptional integrity in Dnmt3ab-dKO HSCs including increased expression of repetitive elements, inappropriate mRNA splicing, and over-expression of HSC-specific genes. To examine the impact of loss of Dnmt3a and -3b on DNA methylation in HSCs, we performed Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing (WGBS). Ablation of both enzymes resulted in loss of DNA methylation that was much more extensive than that seen in the absence of Dnmt3a alone, while loss of Dnmt3b alone showed only minimal changes in DNA methylation compared to control HSCs. One puzzling finding was the observation that a subset of promoter CpG islands (CGIs) actually gained DNA methylation in Dnmt3a-KO HSCs. This CGI hypermethylation is a cancer methylome phenotype and was specific to Dnmt3a-KO HSCs (Figure 1A). The HSC transplant experiments suggest that Dnmt3a can compensate for Dnmt3b in HSCs, but Dnmt3b cannot reciprocate in the reverse situation. An explanation for increases in DNA methylation is that in the absence of Dnmt3a, abnormal function of Dnmt3b may lead to aberrant CGI hypermethylation as the hypermethylation was lost when both enzymes were conditionally inactivated. To confirm the mechanism, post-transplant Dnmt3ab-dKO HSCs were transduced with a retroviral vector encoding ectopic expression of Dnmt3b (MIG-Dnmt3b) or a control empty vector (MIG) and assessed for DNA methylation by bisulfite PCR. Using the promoter CGI of Praf2 as an example, enforced expression of Dnmt3b in Dnmt3ab-dKO HSCs resulted in increased DNA methylation at this loci compared to Dnmt3ab-dKO HSCs transduced with a control empty vector (MIG), control HSCs transduced with either MIG or MIG-Dnmt3b and untransduced HSCs (Figure 1B). It is possible that when Dnmt3b tries to compensate for Dnmt3a, the locus-specificity for targets is reduced, leading to aberrant DNA methylation patterns. Promoter CGI hypermethylation is a cancer phenotype observed in a wide range of tumors, including hematopoietic neoplasms driven by mutation in DNMT3A. Targeting DNMT3B in DNMT3A-mutation hematopoietic pathologies may be a therapeutic option for restoring normal DNA methylation and gene expression patterns.Figure 1Praf2 promoter DNA methylation. Open circle = unmethylated CpG, closed circle = methylated CpG. (A) DNA methylation patterns in control (Ctl), Dnmt3a-KO (3aKO), Dnmt3b-KO (3bKO) and Dnmt3ab-dKO HSCs (dKO). (B) Patterns in control and Dnmt3ab-dKO HSCs transduced with empty vector (MIG) or ectopic Dnmt3b, compared to untransduced HSCs.Figure 1. Praf2 promoter DNA methylation. Open circle = unmethylated CpG, closed circle = methylated CpG. (A) DNA methylation patterns in control (Ctl), Dnmt3a-KO (3aKO), Dnmt3b-KO (3bKO) and Dnmt3ab-dKO HSCs (dKO). (B) Patterns in control and Dnmt3ab-dKO HSCs transduced with empty vector (MIG) or ectopic Dnmt3b, compared to untransduced HSCs. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Peng ◽  
Yiming Li ◽  
Xiangyan Kong ◽  
Xiaoshu Zhu ◽  
Xiaojun Ding

Different DNA methylation patterns presented on different tissues or cell types are considered as one of the main reasons accounting for the tissue-specific gene expressions. In recent years, many methods have been proposed to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) based on the mixture of methylation signals from homologous chromosomes. To investigate the possible influence of homologous chromosomes on methylation analysis, this paper proposed a method (MHap) to construct methylation haplotypes for homologous chromosomes in CpG dense regions. Through comparing the methylation consistency between homologous chromosomes in different cell types, it can be found that majority of paired methylation haplotypes derived from homologous chromosomes are consistent, while a lower methylation consistency was observed in the breast cancer sample. It also can be observed that the hypomethylation consistency of differentiated cells is higher than that of the corresponding undifferentiated stem cells. Furthermore, based on the methylation haplotypes constructed on homologous chromosomes, a method (MHap_DMR) is developed to identify DMRs between differentiated cells and the corresponding undifferentiated stem cells, or between the breast cancer sample and the normal breast sample. Through comparing the methylation haplotype modes of DMRs in two cell types, the DNA methylation changing directions of homologous chromosomes in cell differentiation and cancerization can be revealed. The code is available at: https://github.com/xqpeng/MHap_DMR.


2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (7) ◽  
pp. 935-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Fischer ◽  
Sonja Gaedicke ◽  
Jan Frank ◽  
Frank Döring ◽  
Gerald Rimbach

The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of a 6-month dietary vitamin E (VE) deficiency on DNA methylation and gene expression in rat liver. Two enzymes, 5-α-steroid reductase type 1 (SRD5A1) and the regulatory subunit of γ-glutamylcysteinyl synthetase (GCLM), which are differentially expressed on the mRNA level, were analysed for promoter methylation in putative cytosine-phospho-guanine (CpG) island regions located at the 5′ end using base-specific cleavage and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight MS. A twofold increase in the mRNA level of SRD5A1 gene and a twofold decrease in the mRNA level of GCLM gene in VE-deficient animals were not associated with different CpG methylation of the analysed promoter region. Furthermore, global DNA methylation was not significantly different in these two groups. Thus, the present results indicate that the VE-induced regulation of SRD5A1 and GCLM in rat liver is not directly mediated by changes in promoter DNA methylation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document