A History of Religious Arbitration

Author(s):  
Michael J. Broyde

This chapter focuses on the premodern use of religious courts to resolve ecclesiastical disputes within Western societies. Religious arbitration is by no means a new mechanism. It dates back hundreds of years. Societal acceptance of religious courts operating within the broader secular legal system is thus deeply ingrained in the Western tradition and in the common-law tradition that formed the bedrock of American jurisprudence. The history of religious arbitration in Western societies is important because it helps contextualize and explain long-standing social, political, and legal comfort with religious groups engaging in various forms of alternative dispute resolution separate but not entirely outside societal laws. However, although its deep historical roots indicate that religious arbitration has stood the test of time, various practices and experiences associated with early forms of religious dispute resolution have led many people to become skeptical and wary of its place in modern secular societies.

1978 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-133
Author(s):  
James F. Bailey

Comparative law has a long history, and it has long been a tradition among legal scholars to compare one legal system with others. Even in the days when Rome ruled the so-called “known world”, there were other legal systems which existed either with the Roman Empire, side-by-side with the Roman jus civilis, or outside the Empire in the German tribes, in the Parthian Empire, among the Celts, and so forth. Law is the element which regulates and harmonizes human activity, behavior, and endeavor within any ordered society, primitive or advanced, and few if any societies could exist for long without some sort of law and legal system. Law is therefore part of the culture, the daily life, behavior, civilization, and yes, even the history of a people and their civilization. Unless a civilization or folk-group is a carbon copy of another, then it is normal to expect differences in the manner in which rights are vindicated, differences resolved, and an orderly solution found for the conflicts in human life.


Author(s):  
Moh Sutoro

The year 2006 is seen in the most revolutionary in the history of the existence of religious courts in the Indonesian legal system. Delegation of authority to examine, decide and resolve syariah economic case to the Religious Court signaled recognition of the existence of religious courts as well as the realization of the desire of the majority, even all Muslims in Indonesia to resolve the dispute in accordance guidance Shari'a. However, in practice before the judicial reviewe Act No. 21 of 2008 concerning Islamic banking, which in practice contains legal uncertainty because of the problem stems from differences in interpretation in deciding which forum has the authority to resolve disputes Islamic banking at hand that is the Choice of Forum and the Choice of law which in turn raises the formulation of legal uncertainty. Keywords: Competence, Dispute Resolution, legal certainty


Author(s):  
Joshua Getzler

This chapter investigates the idea of doctrine as a focus of historical scholarship, asking how the doctrinal mentality arose, and how historical approaches to doctrine emerged strongly in both common-law and civilian or Romanistic legal cultures. It first defines the meaning of ‘doctrine’, and sets out a guiding thesis. It argues that an important dimension of doctrine is communication; and jurists become fascinated by the history of doctrine when social and political conditions necessitate an expansion or transfer of the legal system, with concomitant transfers of doctrinal thought. The chapter then traces the development of doctrinal history from Gaius to the common law tradition.


1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Powell

The history of arbitration procedures and extra-judicial forms of dispute settlement in medieval England remains largely unwritten. This neglect is no doubt attributable to the precocious development of the common law, which has monopolized the attention of English legal historians and left them little time to consider alternative forms of dispute resolution. Their main preoccupation, epitomized in the work of great scholars such as Maitland, Holdsworth and Plucknett, has been to trace the evolution of legal institutions, procedures and doctrine. Consideration of arbitration has at best been regarded as peripheral to this central task.


2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helge Dedek

Every legal system that ties judicial decision making to a body of preconceived norms has to face the tension between the normative formulation of the ideal and its approximation in social reality. In the parlance of the common law, it is, more concretely, the remedy that bridges the gap between the ideal and the real, or, rather, between norms and facts. In the common law world—particularly in the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth—a lively discourse has developed around the question of how rights relate to remedies. To the civilian legal scholar—used to thinking within a framework that strictly categorizes terms like substance and procedure, subjective right, action, and execution—the concept of remedy remains a mystery. The lack of “remedy” in the vocabulary of the civil law is more than just a matter of attaching different labels to functional equivalents, it is the expression of a different way of thinking about law. Only if a legal system is capable of satisfactorily transposing the abstract discourse of the law into social reality does the legal machinery fulfill its purpose: due to the pivotal importance of this translational process, the way it is cast in legal concepts thus allows for an insight into the deep structure of a legal culture, and, convergence notwithstanding, the remaining epistemological differences between the legal traditions of the West. A mixed jurisdiction must reflect upon these differences in order to understand its own condition and to define its future course.


1977 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 373
Author(s):  
J. L. Barton ◽  
A. W. B. Simpson ◽  
S. J. Stoljar
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document