Mortality Risk Assessment and Prognostication

Author(s):  
Maral Ouzounian ◽  
Jack V. Tu ◽  
Peter C. Austin ◽  
Douglas S. Lee
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Sonnweber ◽  
Eva-Maria Schneider ◽  
Manfred Nairz ◽  
Igor Theurl ◽  
Günter Weiss ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Risk stratification is essential to assess mortality risk and guide treatment in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH). We herein compared the accuracy of different currently used PH risk stratification tools and evaluated the significance of particular risk parameters. Methods We conducted a retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study evaluating seven different risk assessment approaches according to the current PH guidelines. A comprehensive assessment including multi-parametric risk stratification was performed at baseline and 4 yearly follow-up time-points. Multi-step Cox hazard analysis was used to analyse and refine risk prediction. Results Various available risk models effectively predicted mortality in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Right-heart catheter parameters were not essential for risk prediction. Contrary, non-invasive follow-up re-evaluations significantly improved the accuracy of risk estimations. A lack of accuracy of various risk models was found in the intermediate- and high-risk classes. For these patients, an additional evaluation step including assessment of age and right atrium area improved risk prediction significantly. Discussion Currently used abbreviated versions of the ESC/ERS risk assessment tool, as well as the REVEAL 2.0 and REVEAL Lite 2 based risk stratification, lack accuracy to predict mortality in intermediate- and high-risk precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients. An expanded non-invasive evaluation improves mortality risk prediction in these individuals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Reza Marateb ◽  
Maja von Cube ◽  
Ramin Sami ◽  
Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard ◽  
Marjan Mansourian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Already at hospital admission, clinicians require simple tools to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients at high risk of mortality. Such tools can significantly improve resource allocation and patient management within hospitals. From the statistical point of view, extended time-to-event models are required to account for competing risks (discharge from hospital) and censoring so that active cases can also contribute to the analysis. Methods We used the hospital-based open Khorshid COVID Cohort (KCC) study with 630 COVID-19 patients from Isfahan, Iran. Competing risk methods are used to develop a death risk chart based on the following variables, which can simply be measured at hospital admission: sex, age, hypertension, oxygen saturation, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. The area under the receiver operator curve was used to assess accuracy concerning discrimination between patients discharged alive and dead. Results Cause-specific hazard regression models show that these baseline variables are associated with both death, and discharge hazards. The risk chart reflects the combined results of the two cause-specific hazard regression models. The proposed risk assessment method had a very good accuracy (AUC = 0.872 [CI 95%: 0.835–0.910]). Conclusions This study aims to improve and validate a personalized mortality risk calculator based on hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The risk assessment of patient mortality provides physicians with additional guidance for making tough decisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyotaka Tsunemi ◽  
Kikuo Yoshida ◽  
Takehiro Kihara ◽  
Tei Saburi ◽  
Kyoko Ono

This study involves a screening-level risk assessment of the impairment of human health and life related to hydrogen explosion and chemical release during the operation of a hydrogen refueling station (HRS) that uses organic hydride. First, twenty-one accident scenarios were identified involving the leakage of hydrogen, toluene and methylcyclohexane (MCH) in the HRS. Next, the leakage frequency for each scenario was estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Simulations were then performed of the blast-wave pressure and heat radiation after a hydrogen leak and of atmospheric dispersion of evaporated chemicals after leaks of liquid MCH and toluene. The consequences were estimated for each scenario according to leak size using the existing probit functions and threshold values. Finally, the risk due to explosion, heat radiation, and acute toxicity was estimated by multiplying the consequence by the leakage frequency. The results show that the mortality risk of explosion and acute effect is less than 10−6 per year, which is a negligible level of concern. However, the mortality risk of heat radiation in the scenarios involving hydrogen leakage from the pipe connected to the cylinders and compressors exceeds 10−4 per year inside the HRS, thereby requiring additional steps if a more-detailed risk assessment is needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaetano Ruocco ◽  
Peter A. McCullough ◽  
Kristen M. Tecson ◽  
Massimo Mancone ◽  
Gaetano M. De Ferrari ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Bilkova ◽  
Zuzana Motovska ◽  
Petr Widimsky ◽  
Jaroslav Dvorak ◽  
Libor Lisa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Pilotto ◽  
Maria Cristina Polidori ◽  
Nicola Veronese ◽  
Francesco Panza ◽  
Rosa Arboretti Giancristofaro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document