scholarly journals Sufficiency, Comprehensiveness of Health Care Coverage, and Cost-Sharing Arrangements in the Realpolitik of Health Policy

2016 ◽  
pp. 267-280
Author(s):  
Govind Persad ◽  
Harald Schmidt
2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
David U. Himmelstein ◽  
Steffie Woolhandler ◽  
Mark Almberg ◽  
Clare Fauke

While efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act were narrowly defeated, grave problems in health care persist. Twenty-eight million remain uninsured, a number that is likely to increase. Millions more who have coverage cannot afford care because of high cost-sharing requirements. Meanwhile, the corporate takeover of medical care in the United States is at a gallop. This article provides a brief précis of recent data on U.S. health policy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David U. Himmelstein ◽  
Steffie Woolhandler ◽  
Mark Almberg ◽  
Clare Fauke

Despite implementation of the Affordable Care Act in 2014, the U.S. health care crisis continues. While coverage has been expanded, 28 million people remain uninsured, and tens of millions who have coverage are unable to afford care because of high cost-sharing requirements. Moreover, many with coverage have a sharply restricted choice of physicians and hospitals, and the corporate takeover of medical care in the United States is proceeding rapidly. This article provides a brief précis of recent data on U.S. health policy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tambor ◽  
J Klich ◽  
A Domagała

Abstract Background The transformation of health care systems in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries after the fall of communism resulted in increased household out-of-pocket payments for health and a deterioration of equity in health care. Since then, CEE countries have been struggling to ensure sufficient public resources for health and improve universal health coverage. Methods We evaluated the progress in achieving universal health care coverage made over the last two decades in eight European Union countries (EU-8): Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia. A desk research method was applied (2019) to collect and analyze quantitative data on health care expenditure and qualitative data on health care coverage (population coverage, service coverage, patient cost-sharing, and quality of care). Results The results show an increased priority on the part of governments to fund health care in the EU-8 countries. Nevertheless, public resources have not been sufficient to significantly reduce the role of out-of-pocket expenditure. Out-of-pocket payments in the analyzed countries result from the explicit decision to shift costs to households (patient cost-sharing for medicines, excluding dental care) or implicit rationing (long waiting times for specialist services). Despite some common features, there is a great diversity across the EU-8 with some countries (Latvia) marked with significant gaps in health care coverage, and others (Czechia, Slovenia) providing universal health care with relatively low out-of-pocket payments. Conclusions There is room for reducing out-of-pocket payments in the EU-8 through further budget prioritization. A systematic and evidence-based approach to establish a benefit basket and patient cost-sharing obligations might help to improve universal health coverage in these countries. Key messages In the last two decades, the EU-8 countries have made moderate progress in achieving universal health coverage. Despite governments’ increased priority for health, significant gaps in service and cost coverage, as well as quality of care, persist in some EU-8 countries.


Author(s):  
Sara R. Collins Collins ◽  
Michelle M. Doty Doty ◽  
Petra W. Rasmussen Rasmussen ◽  
Sophie Beutel Beutel

1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 241-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Rodwin

Owen Barfield, the British solicitor and literary scholar, reminds us that many legal concepts have their origin as metaphors and legal fictions. We often fail to see the nature of legal metaphors, Barfield argues, because over time they ossify and we read them literally rather than figuratively. Look closely at changes in law over time, Barfield advises us, to see how effectively metaphor works in law and language. Many legal categories and procedures we now use had their origin in using a metaphor that revealed a new way of looking at a problem or that helped solve a legal problem. Legal metaphors also help us to identify critical limits and strains in adapting to new facts and circumstances.George Annas has pointed out that our choice of metaphors for medicine can reframe our debates about health policy reform. And Analee and Thomas Beisecker remind us that patient-physician relations have been viewed through many metaphors. These include parent-child relations (paternalism); seller-purchaser transactions (consumerism); teacher-student learning (education); relations among partners or friends (partnership or friendship); or rational parties entering into negotiations or contracts (negotiation or rational contract).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document